As a father of two daughters who were born in the decade of the '80s, I'm grateful that they didn't have to deal with the insanity which is now prevailing at colleges today.
It's gotten so bad today at colleges that students are being indoctrinated into becoming social justice warriors by the time they finish their degrees; unless, of course, they're going to Liberty, or Hillsdale which don't take a dime of federal funding. (However, I
must point out that my older brother's daughter, who went off to a
mid-west college prior to my daughters being old enough to go, came home
totally indoctrinated from her college experience.)
Penny Nance has written an excellent article about her own child's orientation which just took place for this coming fall. You won't believe what the experience was like! If you think things have gotten crazy at colleges today, then you'll have that sentiment confirmed when reading this article.
Friday, August 23, 2019
Sunday, August 18, 2019
They're Coming To America
Neil Diamond's song of this post title rings true of those who, living in a country with different, but less fortunate circumstances, hear about the opportunity which awaits them if they go to the effort of getting here through the legal process.
When they finally arrive, often through great difficulty - leaving their loved ones behind due to the expense of such a trip - they discover that the stories about America are true and many times, even more amazing and wonderful. This was the case for Carla from a South American country. Having lived in America for several decades, she was motivated to become naturalized because of what Pres. Trump has done in his first term.
Sadly, as Rush Limbaugh pointed out recently in his radio show, the globalists who want to promote broderless countries are working at achieving the exact opposite. They - George Soros being one of the more prominent figures in the effort - finance organizations to recruit and encourage Hondurans, Guatemalans, or El Salvadorans to form massive "caravans" of people to simply march up through Mexico to the southern border and either sneak across the border, or take advantage of laws which eventually allow them to fade into the shadows of our various cities.
This process of applying the "Cloward & Piven" strategy of overwhelming a specific system, and thereby bring about a crisis that attempts to break the system established down, is the goal of such an activity by these globalists elitists; like George Soros and his Open Society.
So, I ask the question: Why is that Carla understands the importance of supporting the president, while many who've lived in America all their lives don't? Is it just that they have different political ideals, or is it out of ignorance, because they have never experienced anything other than what this great country has to offer, and thus take it for granted?
I've long believed that this nation's affluence has contributed to the latter mindset, where the concept of "fairness" and "privilege" have been perverted to work for those who want to promote socialism and not applying one's self to what it takes in order to accomplish those things which make for a better life within the social structure of law & order for all.
When they finally arrive, often through great difficulty - leaving their loved ones behind due to the expense of such a trip - they discover that the stories about America are true and many times, even more amazing and wonderful. This was the case for Carla from a South American country. Having lived in America for several decades, she was motivated to become naturalized because of what Pres. Trump has done in his first term.
Sadly, as Rush Limbaugh pointed out recently in his radio show, the globalists who want to promote broderless countries are working at achieving the exact opposite. They - George Soros being one of the more prominent figures in the effort - finance organizations to recruit and encourage Hondurans, Guatemalans, or El Salvadorans to form massive "caravans" of people to simply march up through Mexico to the southern border and either sneak across the border, or take advantage of laws which eventually allow them to fade into the shadows of our various cities.
This process of applying the "Cloward & Piven" strategy of overwhelming a specific system, and thereby bring about a crisis that attempts to break the system established down, is the goal of such an activity by these globalists elitists; like George Soros and his Open Society.
So, I ask the question: Why is that Carla understands the importance of supporting the president, while many who've lived in America all their lives don't? Is it just that they have different political ideals, or is it out of ignorance, because they have never experienced anything other than what this great country has to offer, and thus take it for granted?
I've long believed that this nation's affluence has contributed to the latter mindset, where the concept of "fairness" and "privilege" have been perverted to work for those who want to promote socialism and not applying one's self to what it takes in order to accomplish those things which make for a better life within the social structure of law & order for all.
Wednesday, August 14, 2019
Sunday, August 11, 2019
The Epstein Story Grows More Mysterious by the Minute!
It appears that the "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous" isn't exactly what Robin Leach of the television series of the '90s made them all out to be.
The following links I'm posting here are for those who "think" they know what has gone on in the Jeffrey Epstein news; mostly because the Media (D) is only feeding the public what they know will "sell" and what they don't want it to know about what was has really gone on in secret.
Thanks go to my friend, who keeps in close touch with what's really going on in the "swamp".
Speaking of the "swamp", you might want to watch this '87 interview on the Late Night with David Letterman Show of Donald Trump. The more interesting comments begin at about the 15 minute mark into the segment. And then, there's this pre-2000 interview with Jay Leno on the Tonight Show about him running for president then. Gee, do you think he was at least consistent with his policies? It's interesting to compare comments about Mayor Koch and Mayor Gulliani. Finally, there's this 2013 interview by David Letterman with Donald as a grandpa for the sixth time. After about the 8:00 mark, they discuss the political situation then.
The following links I'm posting here are for those who "think" they know what has gone on in the Jeffrey Epstein news; mostly because the Media (D) is only feeding the public what they know will "sell" and what they don't want it to know about what was has really gone on in secret.
Thanks go to my friend, who keeps in close touch with what's really going on in the "swamp".
Speaking of the "swamp", you might want to watch this '87 interview on the Late Night with David Letterman Show of Donald Trump. The more interesting comments begin at about the 15 minute mark into the segment. And then, there's this pre-2000 interview with Jay Leno on the Tonight Show about him running for president then. Gee, do you think he was at least consistent with his policies? It's interesting to compare comments about Mayor Koch and Mayor Gulliani. Finally, there's this 2013 interview by David Letterman with Donald as a grandpa for the sixth time. After about the 8:00 mark, they discuss the political situation then.
Wednesday, August 7, 2019
Why Are Liberals So Obsessed With Taxing Everyone?
As I was listening to Rush this morning I heard the following interview. Something this person said hit me with a thought that I'd NEVER considered before. I'd like my readers to go through this script from Rush's show and see if you can detect exactly what it was that this teacher in L.A. said that sparked this speculation. I will share that particular thought after the script.
= = = = = = = = = = =
RUSH: Hi. Welcome back. Rush Limbaugh, cutting edge of societal evolution. We go to Dallas to get started on the phones. I’m sorry, it’s Los Angeles, and Dallas is the guy’s name. Great to have you, Dallas. Welcome to the program.
CALLER: Thanks, Rush. It’s great to talk to you.
RUSH: Thank you, sir.
CALLER: I am a gay schoolteacher living in Los Angeles, California. I voted for Obama twice, and the left has gone so far they have pushed me out of the party and have me seething, So what in the hell are they doing to the industrial Midwest?
RUSH: You know, this is another good point. I’m glad that you mentioned this. You say you voted for Obama twice. How old are you? How long have you been voting?
CALLER: I’m 40.
RUSH: You’re 40. By the way, how do you survive in California as a teacher with the tax rate and all the taxes out there? I mean, that’s gotta be… (crosstalk) Do you have any disposable income left, Dallas?
CALLER: I got a little bit left over ’cause I don’t have kids. If I had a family, I could never do it. But, yeah. I get into some very interesting discussions all the time because I want to have open-minded discussions. Trump, to me, exposed both parties and what they’re about. It’s the “uni-party” versus the American people.
RUSH: That’s another great point. See, it dovetails with the belief that l I think there are Trump voters more than there are Republican voters. Even though he’s got 90% approval among Republican voters. But, look, this is something that we will never hear about. In fact, we’re hearing the opposite. But here’s Dallas. He’s a gay schoolteacher in Los Angeles. He has left the Democrat Party after he voted for Obama twice. They’re too nuts! They’ve gone too radical leftist even for him. Now he’s probably not shouting from the rooftops that he’s switching or not voting Democrat. But, still, he’s not.
Now, all the while this is going on, the media wants you to believe that Trump is losing suburban voters because he’s not agreeing to gun control. You want to talk about a political myth? “Yeah, Trump is losing suburban voters!” In other words, suburban voters want guns taken away and Trump won’t do it, and so Trump is losing suburban voters. It’s the exact opposite. The story here is what is happening to the Democrat Party that Joe Biden is the frontrunner in this party?
= = = = = = =
So, did you catch that remark about family and taxes from Dallas? I've always, as most do, known that liberals love to tax everyone to the point of making it difficult to get by, but this gay guy's statement about how he could never do it if he had a family caused a sudden realization that made a connection for me... liberals are using taxation on the citizens to make it all the more difficult to raise a family. Why is this significant?
Well, we also know that liberals, first of all, consider themselves to be so smart that they've got all the ideas that will solve all the world's problems, right? Okay, we also know that the vast majority of liberals have their shorts in a twist about climate change, and how it's going to kill the planet in about a decade... and, we also know that they've promoted the idea that the world's population needs to be reduced, right?
So, if we connect their pension for taxation which makes it more difficult for a couple to raise a family, with climate change and population, then... are you getting where I'm going with this? If the liberal's overarching agenda is to reduce the population of our country, while wanting to deal with climate change, then one way to tackle both issues simultaneously, is to tax them to death while filling their coffers for all their social programs to keep the masses dependent on them for their needs. Brilliant!
= = = = = = = = = = =
RUSH: Hi. Welcome back. Rush Limbaugh, cutting edge of societal evolution. We go to Dallas to get started on the phones. I’m sorry, it’s Los Angeles, and Dallas is the guy’s name. Great to have you, Dallas. Welcome to the program.
CALLER: Thanks, Rush. It’s great to talk to you.
RUSH: Thank you, sir.
CALLER: I am a gay schoolteacher living in Los Angeles, California. I voted for Obama twice, and the left has gone so far they have pushed me out of the party and have me seething, So what in the hell are they doing to the industrial Midwest?
RUSH: You know, this is another good point. I’m glad that you mentioned this. You say you voted for Obama twice. How old are you? How long have you been voting?
CALLER: I’m 40.
RUSH: You’re 40. By the way, how do you survive in California as a teacher with the tax rate and all the taxes out there? I mean, that’s gotta be… (crosstalk) Do you have any disposable income left, Dallas?
CALLER: I got a little bit left over ’cause I don’t have kids. If I had a family, I could never do it. But, yeah. I get into some very interesting discussions all the time because I want to have open-minded discussions. Trump, to me, exposed both parties and what they’re about. It’s the “uni-party” versus the American people.
RUSH: That’s another great point. See, it dovetails with the belief that l I think there are Trump voters more than there are Republican voters. Even though he’s got 90% approval among Republican voters. But, look, this is something that we will never hear about. In fact, we’re hearing the opposite. But here’s Dallas. He’s a gay schoolteacher in Los Angeles. He has left the Democrat Party after he voted for Obama twice. They’re too nuts! They’ve gone too radical leftist even for him. Now he’s probably not shouting from the rooftops that he’s switching or not voting Democrat. But, still, he’s not.
Now, all the while this is going on, the media wants you to believe that Trump is losing suburban voters because he’s not agreeing to gun control. You want to talk about a political myth? “Yeah, Trump is losing suburban voters!” In other words, suburban voters want guns taken away and Trump won’t do it, and so Trump is losing suburban voters. It’s the exact opposite. The story here is what is happening to the Democrat Party that Joe Biden is the frontrunner in this party?
= = = = = = =
So, did you catch that remark about family and taxes from Dallas? I've always, as most do, known that liberals love to tax everyone to the point of making it difficult to get by, but this gay guy's statement about how he could never do it if he had a family caused a sudden realization that made a connection for me... liberals are using taxation on the citizens to make it all the more difficult to raise a family. Why is this significant?
Well, we also know that liberals, first of all, consider themselves to be so smart that they've got all the ideas that will solve all the world's problems, right? Okay, we also know that the vast majority of liberals have their shorts in a twist about climate change, and how it's going to kill the planet in about a decade... and, we also know that they've promoted the idea that the world's population needs to be reduced, right?
So, if we connect their pension for taxation which makes it more difficult for a couple to raise a family, with climate change and population, then... are you getting where I'm going with this? If the liberal's overarching agenda is to reduce the population of our country, while wanting to deal with climate change, then one way to tackle both issues simultaneously, is to tax them to death while filling their coffers for all their social programs to keep the masses dependent on them for their needs. Brilliant!
Monday, August 5, 2019
Social Media Vs. Social Interaction
Ever since the inception of the United States of America our culture has had guns.
As recently as the 1960s when I was going to high school, many schools across the country actually had shooting clubs and ranges in basements.
Why weren't there mass murders then, like we're experience more regularly today?
In the decades after W.W. II those men who came home from Europe, or the Pacific, did their best to put behind them the horrid memories of that experience, married, or returned to their wives, to raise their families and work. Guns were still part of the culture, but there weren't the types of incidences we see today?
So, what's different today that we didn't have then?
In those post war decades Americans focused on building up its culture by focusing on social interactions and maintaining the long standing tradition of going to their church of choice where morals were focused on weekly. During this period there were a wide variety of community oriented social clubs; Rotary, Kiwanis, Elks, Eagles, Bowling Leagues, Boy Scouts, Girls Scouts, etc. which all focused on developing individual character and integrity.
When I point out social interaction, I mean such things as understanding the norms of the day when it comes to etiquette; how one was expected to conduct themselves, both within the family unit, and out in public.
Within the family, the man of the household - with the team approach support of the spouse - would spend time explaining, correcting, and even disciplining their child(ren) when behavior didn't meet the common social norms of the time period.
In public, certain behaviors were expected and taught as part of their upbringing; respect, conduct which reflected honorably on the parent(s), and even other adults in the neighborhood would often play a role in "parenting" when children were found to be misbehaving.
Today our cultural norms have all but disappeared. What has contributed to such a drastic change?
In my honest opinion what changed over the decades after the sixties is technology.
Television became a dominant influence by setting an attitude about various issues of the day. My mother used to refer to television as the "peephole to paradise", meaning that we were consuming the concepts which allowed us to escape from reality and accept that we deserved this, or that, even if we couldn't afford it.
But with the advent of the Internet, social interactions transitioned to social media and anonymity. No longer were expectations of conduct in a decent way part of the culture.
Facebook, Twitter, SnapChat, you name it, it's become apparent to me that courtesy and decency has gone the way of penny loafers and sock hops of a by-gone era when families produced happy, belonging, and contributing adults to society.
I once drove by a group of about six people standing on a street corner, and every one of them were all looking into their cell phones; not one interacting with the other. It's jokingly shown in commercials on occasion how families sitting at a dinner table eating, are all looking at their phones and texting each other, instead of looking at, and speaking to, one another.
Yes, now we have young men who spend there time filling their minds with garbage that only causes them to feel detached from others and reality. Those before them have given them a copy-cat opportunity for notoriety and fame; even if they go out in the process of killing others.
We're now finding out that these few deranged are fueled by hate and warped ideals of white-supremacy, reeking havoc out in pubic venues by killing innocent victims and creating tragedy for many connect in some way to those lost to it.
And yet, today we continue to wonder why we have such horrible things happening.You might want to watch this video, it'll make it perfectly clear where we've ended up.
As recently as the 1960s when I was going to high school, many schools across the country actually had shooting clubs and ranges in basements.
Why weren't there mass murders then, like we're experience more regularly today?
In the decades after W.W. II those men who came home from Europe, or the Pacific, did their best to put behind them the horrid memories of that experience, married, or returned to their wives, to raise their families and work. Guns were still part of the culture, but there weren't the types of incidences we see today?
So, what's different today that we didn't have then?
In those post war decades Americans focused on building up its culture by focusing on social interactions and maintaining the long standing tradition of going to their church of choice where morals were focused on weekly. During this period there were a wide variety of community oriented social clubs; Rotary, Kiwanis, Elks, Eagles, Bowling Leagues, Boy Scouts, Girls Scouts, etc. which all focused on developing individual character and integrity.
When I point out social interaction, I mean such things as understanding the norms of the day when it comes to etiquette; how one was expected to conduct themselves, both within the family unit, and out in public.
Within the family, the man of the household - with the team approach support of the spouse - would spend time explaining, correcting, and even disciplining their child(ren) when behavior didn't meet the common social norms of the time period.
In public, certain behaviors were expected and taught as part of their upbringing; respect, conduct which reflected honorably on the parent(s), and even other adults in the neighborhood would often play a role in "parenting" when children were found to be misbehaving.
Today our cultural norms have all but disappeared. What has contributed to such a drastic change?
In my honest opinion what changed over the decades after the sixties is technology.
Television became a dominant influence by setting an attitude about various issues of the day. My mother used to refer to television as the "peephole to paradise", meaning that we were consuming the concepts which allowed us to escape from reality and accept that we deserved this, or that, even if we couldn't afford it.
But with the advent of the Internet, social interactions transitioned to social media and anonymity. No longer were expectations of conduct in a decent way part of the culture.
Facebook, Twitter, SnapChat, you name it, it's become apparent to me that courtesy and decency has gone the way of penny loafers and sock hops of a by-gone era when families produced happy, belonging, and contributing adults to society.
I once drove by a group of about six people standing on a street corner, and every one of them were all looking into their cell phones; not one interacting with the other. It's jokingly shown in commercials on occasion how families sitting at a dinner table eating, are all looking at their phones and texting each other, instead of looking at, and speaking to, one another.
Yes, now we have young men who spend there time filling their minds with garbage that only causes them to feel detached from others and reality. Those before them have given them a copy-cat opportunity for notoriety and fame; even if they go out in the process of killing others.
We're now finding out that these few deranged are fueled by hate and warped ideals of white-supremacy, reeking havoc out in pubic venues by killing innocent victims and creating tragedy for many connect in some way to those lost to it.
And yet, today we continue to wonder why we have such horrible things happening.You might want to watch this video, it'll make it perfectly clear where we've ended up.
Saturday, August 3, 2019
A Crazy Premonition On Growing Mass Murders
I've been reluctant to write about this, but after spending all day working in the hot weather during this time of year, and coming home to learn of the El Paso, Texas massacre in a WallMart, I had a very bizarre premonition that came to me while soaking away my aches and pains from overtaxing my body all day in the heat.
Of course, it's absurd to say anything about such events before any hard facts are announced in the media, but then they tend these days to ignore such common sense out of motivation to be the first to break news, or project their ideological bias on the situation in hopes that it garners more anti-gun supporters who don't understand what they're saying or doing.
So, here goes... I realize this is JUST a thought, but sometimes these have a weird way of making sense. What if there are some anti-gun liberals who are brainwashing so effectively a "soft-target" individual to carry out such massacres for the purpose of keeping the anti-gun agenda alive? Think about this! With all the infringements happening against lawful gun owners who just want to protect and defend themselves, or their families, it doesn't seem to be that outlandish.
Update (8/5/19): This type of response is no surprise from the liberals... in fact, it's expected. But, in a way, it lends credence to my premonition. We just have to learn more of the motive and background of these sick people who carried out these horrors.
Depending on what's learned about this latest individual who carried out this mass killing spree, there might be something to such an absurd notion. But, that's all my premonition is, just a notion.
Of course, it's absurd to say anything about such events before any hard facts are announced in the media, but then they tend these days to ignore such common sense out of motivation to be the first to break news, or project their ideological bias on the situation in hopes that it garners more anti-gun supporters who don't understand what they're saying or doing.
So, here goes... I realize this is JUST a thought, but sometimes these have a weird way of making sense. What if there are some anti-gun liberals who are brainwashing so effectively a "soft-target" individual to carry out such massacres for the purpose of keeping the anti-gun agenda alive? Think about this! With all the infringements happening against lawful gun owners who just want to protect and defend themselves, or their families, it doesn't seem to be that outlandish.
Update (8/5/19): This type of response is no surprise from the liberals... in fact, it's expected. But, in a way, it lends credence to my premonition. We just have to learn more of the motive and background of these sick people who carried out these horrors.
Depending on what's learned about this latest individual who carried out this mass killing spree, there might be something to such an absurd notion. But, that's all my premonition is, just a notion.
Friday, August 2, 2019
Where Unicorns Fart Money Into Your Ledger
From the interactions President Trump is engaging in with certain members of the liberal establishment this past week, I believe the president is deliberately doing this with a duel purpose in mind; first, he's maintaining the upper hand in the campaign by keeping the liberals jockeying for nomination in their party (He already knows that any of the current 20 odd Democrat candidates haven't got much of a chance against his past two years of accomplishments.) and, to point out to the public who still have even a smidgen of common sense, to understand how leftist/socialism has ruined our urban centers across the land. He's pointing out that hundreds of millions have been poured in from both federal and state coffers, yet their policies have resulted in consistent misery, or worsening conditions for many, and have remained the status quo.
Some readers may already know who Stefan Molyneux from Canada is. But, for those who may be seeing him for the first time in this more recent video about the situation in L.A. you will soon learn that he is not a fan of what has developed in most of the major urban cities; Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore, et al, and all run by liberals. Stefan attempts to speak to the city council about the fiscal aspect of offering sanctuary to immigrants who've entered the country illegally, but gets shut down because they do not want to hear any opposition. He points out in the last segment the workings of the psychology which is obviously at work within the ranks of the liberal leftists who believe in virtue signaling their beneficence to those they believe have just as much "rights" as non-citizens.
In the second episode of this new series, Molyneux covers the conditions down on Skid Row within downtown L.A. by speaking with General Jeff - Activits Mayor of Skid Row about the history behind it and the faulty system by design.
Some readers may already know who Stefan Molyneux from Canada is. But, for those who may be seeing him for the first time in this more recent video about the situation in L.A. you will soon learn that he is not a fan of what has developed in most of the major urban cities; Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore, et al, and all run by liberals. Stefan attempts to speak to the city council about the fiscal aspect of offering sanctuary to immigrants who've entered the country illegally, but gets shut down because they do not want to hear any opposition. He points out in the last segment the workings of the psychology which is obviously at work within the ranks of the liberal leftists who believe in virtue signaling their beneficence to those they believe have just as much "rights" as non-citizens.
In the second episode of this new series, Molyneux covers the conditions down on Skid Row within downtown L.A. by speaking with General Jeff - Activits Mayor of Skid Row about the history behind it and the faulty system by design.
Thursday, August 1, 2019
Exposing the Hoax of Climate Change
I
know, I know... we've all received previous messages on this topic,
BUT, you've not seen a video interview of one of the top climatologists
explain why it's a hoax in such simple and easy to understand words.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)