These predictions pertain to the future fall-out of the soon to be released report by Michael Horowitz, the Inspector General out of Connecticut, who's been spending most of this year investigating the investigators.
Just to be clear, there are some points I need to carefully clarify regarding this aspect of the whole situation.
First, the "investigators" are those on the left who, over the last three years, have been constantly beating the narrative "drum" that Donald J. Trump colluded with the Russians to win the 2016 election, obstructed justice, committed bribery on the president of Ukraine, Selenzky, and deserves to have his Twitter account shut down.
As the unfolding of facts have revealed, those who wanted Hillary Clinton elected president, did everything they could to concoct a false narrative, using bogus and unverified assertions that the Trump campaign was "rigging" the election to steal it from her.
Second, there has been some recent reporting which has revealed that much confusion exists about the differences between Michael Horowitz, the Inspector General of the D.O.J., and John Durham, the U.S. Attorney from Connecticut of the A.G. Bill Barr. Part of that confusion is that many are not certain about the difference between Horowitz and Durham, or that they're mixed on who's doing what.
My sources have made it clear to me that Michael Horowitz, who's report is scheduled to be released next Monday, December 9th, has been investigating those who have been involved in the whole "Russian Collusion" hoax from evidence uncovered during the House Intelligence Committee's hearing under the Repulican controlled House prior to the 2018 election. Of course, we know that the Democrats were successful in flipping the control of the House in that election, so it descended in to the abyss of the "secret hearings" underneath the building on Capitol Hill.
Horowitz does not have any power to empanel a Grand Jury, while U.S. Attorney Durham does. Horowitz does not have any power to prosecute individuals found to have committed a crime, Durham does because he's under the Attorney General of the D.O.J., Bill Barr.
Horowitz is only empowered to obtain materials such as documents, emails, text messages, etc. from those individuals within our own federal government agencies here in the U.S., which he then compiles into a report as an independent and impartial third party. Durham, on the other hand, is authorized to pursue evidence of individuals outside our country's federal agencies involved in contributing to the same "Russian Hoax" scenario, such as Christopher Steele, Stefan Halper and Joseph Mifsud.
Durham, on the other hand, as someone down the chain of command from the President through the Attorney General, has been given a set of directives which has "teeth" to his findings which can then potentially lead to indictments and court trials. I'm still uncertain as to whether Durham will, or will not, use any information gathered and reported by Michael Horowitz, but I personally doubt that. Durham's report has been delayed because new information has been uncovered in the process of investigating various leads which have surfaced due to his wider net of people to be interviewed and information to be vetted or verified.
Just today, a report has come out which adds to the confusion surrounding this whole mess. The confusion is compounded by a Media (D) which is doing its best to "soften" the narrative about who's responsible for any crimes related to the facts which will come out in Horowitz's report versus Durham's report. Herein lies an even more complicated problem of understanding why the A.G. Barr has recently stated that Horowitz may be wrong in what some of his findings in his report may reveal.
Horowitz's powers restrict him from garnering information and facts which Durham has. And, more importantly, Horowitz consequently may not know about details which A.G. Barr knows through the information Durham is sharing with the A.G. And, with the Media (D) doing their best to claim otherwise, as this article attempts to do, the public becomes even more befuddled from the conflict of who to believe between them all. No doubt, all part of their persuasion strategy to mislead the public.
For these reasons, I believe that once Durham's report is finally released, many indictments will be forthcoming that will cause the Media (D) and the DNC to throw a conniption fit, or tantrum, the likes we've not yet seen them have. They will claim the most bizarre and ludicrous cover stories in a desperate attempt to maintain their control of their base. Such a position is already being promoted and maintained by the left through news outlets like the Washington Post who's by-line is "Democracy Dies in Darkness", and the New York Times.
This is why it will be critical over the next several months to not jump too quickly to conclusions. Instead, it will best to exercise patience and let the dust settle for a while to let the facts sort out the falsehoods from the truth. In this way, it will become blatantly obvious who's done what and who are the truly guilty ones in all of this.
No comments:
Post a Comment