Living Under the Deception of Doing Good

One thing I've always wondered about was the claim my father-in-law so ardently "crowed" about back in the '80s was that initially a new product - his example was the digital wristwatch - was always more expensive until mass production made it cheaper. At first digital watches were hundreds of dollars to buy, but after a few years when they were almost everywhere they were going for only $20.00. So, I wondered, why didn't this also apply buying automobiles. Despite their being mass produced, my speculation for their continued increasing cost was that it was the inclusion of the latest technology for that time. However, there's a hidden factor which most aren't really aware of are the federal regulations imposed on auto manufactures.

The automobile is unarguably one of America's threads in its cultural fabric. However, with the current shift created by the bureaucrats in the EPA and a few other federal agencies, cars have been changing; especially with the advent of electric cars becoming the "trend" with the "greenies" today. Garmans were once "the" gadget to add into your car for navigating. Now they're built into the auto by the manufacturer. But the rapid change has occurred so fast that we're soon to see driverless cars on the road in the next few years, completely eliminating the need for collecting taxes for a 19th century technology - light rail systems - for solving a 21st century problem; commute traffic congestion.

Prager U has put out a new video pointing out the fallacy that those who buy electric cars are helping to save the planet from ultimate destruction by reducing CO2 emissions. However, studies have revealed that the manufacture of the batteries which power electric cars produce just as much, if not more, of the "greenhouse gasses" as conventional petrol based vehicles. So, the public is very deceptively being sold a "bill of goods" which are actually resulting in the "good" their being told is happening.

The Greatest Government Scam

Those I've encountered who are claiming we all need to do our individual part to save the planet from the ravages of carbon deposits into the atmosphere by our modern indulgences have never been able to explain to me the point I counter to them about mother natures contribution. When I ask them, "So, how do we deal with what Gaia is doing to contribute to this problem?" they look at me like I have two heads with antenna. When they reply by asking what I mean by that question, I ask them how much they know about geological facts of the planet. They usually give me a blank stare because they never really paid attention to the basic science facts which they were taught in middle school. I then proceed to explain how volcanic action around the globe has done more to contribute to polluting the atmosphere than anything we could ever do the mitigate our human impact. This is when they just either walk away, or go into an emotion rant to call me every nasty label they can think of because I've pulled the proverbial rug from underneath their whole paradigm.

Here's a story which makes my point well:

Ian Rutherford Plimer is an Australian  geologist, professor emeritus of earth sciences at the  University of Melbourne, professor of mining geology at the  University of Adelaide, and the  director of multiple mineral exploration and mining companies. He's  published 130 scientific papers, six books and edited the Encyclopedia of  Geology.
    Born: 12 February 1946 
     Residence:  Australia
     Nationality: Australian
     Fields: Earth Science, Geology, Mining  Engineering
     Institutions: University of New England,  University of Newcastle,  University of Melbourne,  University of Adelaide
     Alma mater:  University of New South Wales, Macquarie University
     Thesis: "The pipe deposits of  tungsten-molybdenum-bismuth in eastern  Australia" (1976)
    Notable Awards: Eureka  Prize (1995, 2002), Centenary Medal (2003), Clarke  Medal (2004)
 
Where Does the  Carbon Dioxide Really Come From?
PLIMER:  "Okay, here's the bombshell. The 2010 volcanic eruption in  Iceland. Since its  first spewing of volcanic ash had, in just FOUR DAYS, NEGATED EVERY SINGLE  EFFORT you have made in the past five years to control CO2 emissions on our  planet - all of you.
 
Of course, you know  about this evil carbon dioxide that we are trying to suppress that  vital chemical compound that every plant requires to live and grow and to  synthesize into oxygen for us humans and all animal life.
 
I know....it's very  disheartening to realize that all of the carbon emission savings you have  accomplished while suffering the inconvenience and expense of driving Prius hybrids, buying fabric grocery bags, sitting up till midnight to finish your  kids "The Green Revolution" science project, throwing out all of your non-green cleaning supplies, using only two squares of toilet paper, putting a  brick in your toilet tank reservoir, selling your SUV and speedboat,  vacationing at home instead of abroad, nearly getting hit every day on your bicycle, replacing all of your 50p  light bulbs with £5 light bulbs .....  well, all of those things you have done has all gone down the tubes in during the 2010 eruption in just four days.
 
The volcanic ash  emitted into the Earth's atmosphere in just four days - yes, FOUR DAYS - by  that volcano in Iceland has totally erased every single effort you have made  to reduce the evil beast, carbon.  And there are around 200 active  volcanoes on the planet spewing out this crud at any one time - EVERY  DAY.
 
I don't really want  to rain on your parade too much, but I should mention that when the  volcano  Mt.  Pinatubo erupted in the Philippines in 1991, it spewed out more greenhouse  gases into the atmosphere than the entire human race had emitted in all its  years on earth.
 Yes, folks, Mt.  Pinatubo was active for over one year - think about it!!!!
 
Of course, I  shouldn't spoil this 'touchy-feely tree-hugging' moment and mention the effect  of solar and cosmic activity and the well-recognized 800-year global heating  and cooling cycle, which keeps happening despite our completely insignificant  efforts to affect climate change.
 
And I do wish I had  a silver lining to this volcanic ash cloud, but the fact of the matter is that  the bush fire season across the western USA and  Australia this year alone will  negate your efforts to reduce carbon in our world for the next two to three  years. And it happens every year. Just remember that  your government imposed a whopping carbon tax on you, on the  basis of the bogus 'human-caused' climate-change scenario.
 
Hey, isn't it  interesting how they don't mention 'Global Warming' anymore, but just 'Climate  Change' - you know why? It's because the planet has COOLED by 0.7 degrees in the past few years and these global warming bull artists got caught with their pants down.
 
And, just keep in  mind that you might yet have an Emissions Trading Scheme - that whopping tax - imposed on you that will achieve absolutely nothing except make you  poorer.  It won't stop any volcanoes from erupting, that's for  sure.

Obama's Legacy: My Theory Behind It

As an observer of our nation's general deterioration as I've grown up and more recently during the previous administration's eight year reign, I have developed a clearer theory about how, and why, it is all going down. It expanded with more intense infiltration of operatives from Soviet Russia and the latest operative got into the White House to implement national policies to further degrade our nation's strength in various ways. After all, it has been documented that the long term goal of Communism is to overthrow our nation; however long it takes.

In the past I've stated that in the post WWII era of the '50s when I came into the world, it was the Soviets of Communist Russia who had developed a long-term plan under Nikita Kruschev's leadership. It began with Kruschev banging his shoe on the table in front of him at the U.N. during J.F.K.'s term and shouting in Russian, "We will bury you!"

The cultural revolution of the '60s was orchestrated by a combination of Soviet spies who had effectively infiltrated our government, "useful idiots" of youth who were spoiled by their parent's affluence and wanted to rebel, and the drug cartels who peddled death on the streets of our cities via the desperate children of the ghettos of our larger urban centers. Religion and social values were attacked using various psychological strategies which preyed on the human desire to "be cool" and fit in with those who were considered "on the cutting edge of social change". Our more base obsessions with riches and pleasure in a capitalistic culture dominated our experience as the "British Invasion" of rock & roll swept across the nation, got its youth high on drugs, and molded our youth's attitudes about authority and war. It was a very messy time of change as our nation's innocence was ravaged. Then too, over time the country would learn of the sexual abuses of the past by the priests in the Catholic Church; further demoralizing its citizens and causing religion and morality to lose its place.

With the election of a conservative president in the '80s, the liberal left implemented a strategy of opposition to their long range plan to dominate the public's attitude of wanting something for nothing via the welfare largess of the government and characterizing the sitting president as a "bafoon" who didn't really know what he was talking about. This period was a time of learning from their efforts to be more effective and they used it to defend their next leader, Bill Clinton, from being ousted from office.

Fast forwarding through the Bush I & II administrations where some degree of push back began to reveal itself, the culture of "the Swamp" in D.C. began to coalesce into a self-serving and corporatism dominating the culture within the beltway. At the same time, the mainstream media was filled from the college/university ranks by journalists who predominantly leaned socialist/left.

During this period, way off in the middle of the Pacific Ocean on an island a young black man grew up under the influence of an individual who the F.B.I. considered worth monitoring; one Frank Marshall Davis, who was a registered member of the Communist Party U.S.A. Then, as he moved into the mainland as a college student, he honed the socialist skills of his main mentor; one Saul Alinsky.

Alinsky's focus for his long term goal of undermining the capitalism he abhorred grew out of his training under Al Capone's "right-hand man" in Chicago. As an educated individual on sociology, Alinsky developed a set of "rules for radicals" which was the title of his now more well known book. Fresh out of college at Harvard, Barrack Obama became a community organizer in south Chicago and learned how to implement those rules effectively to rally those less educated members of the community to work against those in power who ignored them. This resulted in a more solid voter base for the Democratic Party in the highly populated urban center.

Eventually his connections and accomplishments got the attention of local political leaders and he began to rise in the ranks of the state legislature during the Bush II years. Then, seemingly out of nowhere, as a state Senator in Congress, he burst onto the national scene with the media practically drooling over his every word. After winning the presidency by brushing Hillary Clinton aside in the primary, and all through his two terms in office, Obama implemented as many liberal/leftist policies he could; clearly going outside the parameters spelled out in the U.S. Constitution.

These policies have created the greatest divisiveness with the country for decades since the Civil Rights era of the late '50s and through the '60s. Stepping into local matters where no president had meddled in before, he stirred up national resentment by occasionally exposing his true sentiments by saying things - like, "...the police acted stupidly..." which started the ball rolling on destroying the "color blindness" that the nation had worked at developing over the past several decades. Now, we have a highly paid - via George Soros - and organized group known as Black Lives Matter which has become popular and idolized as social warriors of social justice among the millennials of today.

This has created a dominating climate of political correctness which has pitted whites against blacks, Christians against Muslims, and rich against poor. People who have benefited from their past social prominence in various ways are now beginning to encounter the wrath of a level of society that has been empowered by socialist thinking; thanks to a president who's mother attended "the little Red schoolhouse" on Mercer Island back in the '60s. If someone is unable to contain their frustration, it becomes a national incident on social media and their employer fires them to protect their public image. Simultaneously, the developments in the middle-eastern countries during Obama's presidency has seen the rise of Islamic Jihad and the immigration of millions who have no intention of assimilating into our nation's society. No, it's rather obvious that they intend to overtake it. Snowflakes, the LGBTQ community (which is actually only 0.3% of the nation's population) and social justice warriors are now dominating the news and running the agenda, thanks to Obama's policies.

Anyone who's been paying attention over the past decade has become aware of the multiple situations which have occurred and how it has intensified since Obama took office. I believe the nation's voters were extremely relieved to hear Trump's message on the campaign trail and had become well aware of the corruption and reputation of his opponent despite the mainstream media's attempt to ignore or hype the concept of electing the first female president. They'd grown tired of those inside the beltway serving their own interests and not those who'd elected them.

Now, those very Republicans who have become comfortable in their ensconced positions of power and influence in "the Swamp" and who pleaded with the voters across the country to just give them total control in Congress so they could fix things, can't even pass a desperation bill to begin discussion of repealing the one thing Obama was able to get implemented that is negatively impacting the whole country; healthcare!

Many are now speculating that this will not bode well for the mid-term elections next year in 2018 and potentially give liberal/leftist/stateists - think Maxine Waters, Charles Schumer, or Nancy Pelosi - another shot at taking back control in Congress to obstruct and make Pres. Trump's agenda even less effective than it already has with their fake news about Russian collusion during the last campaign. Their obsession with Watergate, Part 2, is fantasizing that they'll impeach him from office. If there is any "legacy" for which Obama will be known in the history books of tomorrow, it is this current state of affairs in our cripple political system. It seems to me that it's safe to say... Mission accomplished for the Communists.

Whether the "fly-over country" citizens of the country remain resolved to combat this takeover, or not, will determine its future as a free society, or slaves of the state.

Bill Whittle's "Republic of Emotion"

Bill explains what's really going on with this progressive push to turn our cultural norms upside down.

And then, there's this!

I Can See Clearly Now, The Truth is Out

For the past year the mainstream media has been doing the dirty work of the DNC's cover-up by accusing the sitting President of the very things it has done itself.

Allow me to explain. As I've long believed, whatever the liberals accuse conservatives of, they themselves are guilty of. Liberals are merely using to old strategy of diversion and distraction. The only difference today is that the mainstream media is carrying the water for them by drumming the false narrative of a Russian meddling in the last election as the reason Trump won and Clinton lost.

How can I say this? Simple... if you'll recall, it was Clinton's campaign manager - John Podesta - who had his emails hacked and exposed on Wikileaks. It was Clinton herself who, while Secretary of State (SOS), who arranged for Russia to acquire 20% of the uranium mined in the U.S. and paid her husband $500K, that went to their now defunct "pay-for-play" organization, for a speech. It was Clinton who feigned ignorance of the illegality of having a private server while SOS that was most likely hacked by China and Russia. And it was the DNC who colluded with Clinton and the media to "rig" the election so that Bernie Sanders would lose the Democratic Party's nomination in the primary.

More importantly, as breaking news has recently revealed, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who is a Florida Congresswoman, and was the Chair of the DNC at the time, hired three men of Pakistani origin to be the DNC's IT staff. When the Capitol Police seized the laptop of one of these men for a bank fraud investigation, Cong. W-S was recorded on video verbalizing a threat of consequences to the Capitol Police if they didn't give it back to her as the "elite member of Congress" that she clearly considers herself to be. 

This has finally blown up in her face this week when Imran Awan - one of the IT Pakistanis - attempted to flee the country on Monday after wiring $283K to a family member in Pakistan. The rather interesting detail is that, even after the Capitol Police had seized his laptop back in February, the Congresswoman kept him on her payroll up until the night the FBI arrested him at the Dulles Airport as he was about to board a flight to his home country.

And the coverage of this story this week by the mainstream media? Not so much as a peep! Watch Brittney Hughes explain all the details.

Update: The Media Research Center has reported that the "alphabet soup" networks are completely ignoring this scandal.

What's the Real Reason For Gun Control?

There are 30,000 gun related deaths per year by firearms, and this number is not disputed. U.S. population 324,059,091 as of Wednesday, June 22, 2016. 

Do the math: 0.000000925% of the population dies from gun related actions each year. Statistically speaking, this is insignificant! What is never told, however, is a breakdown of those 30,000 deaths, to put them in perspective as compared to other causes of death:

• 65% of those deaths are by suicide which would never be prevented by gun laws
• 15% are by law enforcement in the line of duty and justified
• 17% are through criminal activity, gang and drug related or mentally ill persons – gun violence
• 3% are accidental discharge deaths

So technically, "gun violence" is not 30,000 annually, but drops to 5,100. Still too many? Well, first, how are those deaths spanned across the nation?
• 480 homicides (9.4%) were in Chicago
• 344 homicides (6.7%) were in Baltimore
• 333 homicides (6.5%) were in Detroit
• 119 homicides (2.3%) were in Washington D.C. (a 54% increase over prior years)

So basically, 25% of all gun crime happens in just 4 cities. All 4 of those cities have strict gun laws, so it is not the lack of law that is the root cause.

This basically leaves 3,825 for the entire rest of the nation, or about 75 deaths per state. That is an average because some States have much higher rates than others. For example, California had 1,169 and Alabama had 1.

Now, who has the strictest gun laws by far? California, of course, but understand, so it is not guns causing this. It is a crime rate spawned by the number of criminal persons residing in those cities and states. So if all cities and states are not created equally, then there must be something other than the tool causing the gun deaths.

Are 5,100 deaths per year horrific? How about in comparison to other deaths? All death is sad and especially so when it is in the commission of a crime but that is the nature of crime. Robbery, death, rape, assault all is done by criminals and thinking that criminals will obey laws is ludicrous. That's why they are criminals.

But what about other deaths each year?
• 40,000+ die from a drug overdose–THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THAT!
• 36,000 people die per year from the flu, far exceeding the criminal gun deaths
• 34,000 people die per year in traffic fatalities(exceeding gun deaths even if you include suicide)

Now it gets good:
• 200,000+ people die each year (and growing) from preventable medical errors. You are safer in Chicago than when you are in a hospital!

• 710,000 people die per year from heart disease. It’s time to stop the double cheeseburgers! So what is the point? If Obama and the anti-gun movement focused their attention on heart disease, even a 10% decrease in cardiac deaths would save twice the number of lives annually of all gun-related deaths (including suicide, law enforcement, etc.). A 10% reduction in medical errors would be 66% of the total gun deaths or 4 times the number of criminal homicides...... Simple, easily preventable 10% reductions!

So you have to ask yourself, in the grand scheme of things, why the focus on guns, especially by liberals? It's pretty simple: Taking away guns gives control to governments.

The founders of this nation knew that regardless of the form of government, those in power may become corrupt and seek to rule as the British did by trying to disarm the populace of the colonies. It is not difficult to understand that a disarmed populace is a controlled populace.

Thus, the second amendment was proudly and boldly included in the U.S. Constitution. It must be preserved at all costs.

So the next time someone tries to tell you that gun control is about saving lives, look at these facts and remember these words from Noah Webster: 

"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword, because the whole body of the people are armed and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. A military force at the command of Congress can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power."

Remember, when it comes to "gun control," the important word is “control," not “gun." After all, we never hear the news telling us a group is determined to pass a law about "car control","knife control", or "baseball bat control"!

We ARE Being Deceived!

For years now the American public has been told by CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations) that Muslims are merely wishing to live in peace with their fellow American citizens. Every time something related to Islam's followers, CAIR tells us that we just don't understand them and their intentions among us here in our land of freedom & liberty.

Well, looky what we have here! Read this and tell me that they want to just "blend in and be peaceful". If you've ever done any actual research on the mindset of this middle-east culture, and Islam's attitudes, you will know what "taqiyyah" is.

Folks, we cannot afford to continue being naive' about what is really going on in our country today! If we don't stand up against this "invasion without a shot fired" similar to what already going on in European nations, then we're in for a rude awakening when things are too far beyond the "tipping point" where it's too late!

8/04/17 Update: An Imam in California has called for Genocide of Jews? Wait! I thought they were a religion of peace!!!
8/09/17 Update: UCLA professor calls for "white racists" to be annihilated on the basis of moral obligations. (See this link for specifics regarding this announcements.) 
8/11/17 Update: Here's some pretty shocking information about the real agenda of Muslims in the U.S.