Monday, December 17, 2018
Why You Should Be A Nationalist
The Media (D) is doing their best to skew the understanding of the public by creating their own meaning or definition of certain words in order to paint the president as some horrible person, or wanting to appear as promoting some terrible idea.
But, if we watch this most recent video released by PragerU, we learn what a nationalist really stands for.
Check it out! It may surprise you.
Sunday, December 16, 2018
If You've Live Long Enough
"One thing I've found out about old age is, if we've studied history long enough, we can usually rebuff any of the dramatic bovine scatology disseminated by the news agencies, which I tend to discount anyway because I just don't have time to be misled or lied to."These words of wisdom by my friend Richard express the sentiments of those of us in the "senior" category of life. In other words, we who've paid attention and know the facts about an issue can see an attempt to revise history in some way.
The recent passing of another "senior" who had far more experience and insight into the threat our nation has faced for the past 18 years since 9/11 is shared here at this link to an article about it.
I urge my readers to check it out.
Saturday, December 15, 2018
The Study Shows...
I came across this article about California's snow pack in the Sierra Nevada range reportedly decreasing drastically over the next several decades.
But the more I read it, the more I wondered how this "study" could make such projections implying that snowfall would continue to shrink causing diminishing runoff into the San Juaquin Valley which runs north and south to the central portion of the state.
I like to think that our advancements in science are providing us with more accurate and reliable information, but the article simply fails to explain adequately to the reader how those who conducted the study can project rainfall in the mountain range so far into the future.
I say this because I get the sense that there are various factors which play into such studies. For starters, the article cites data for weather back to the 1880s. Is that really sufficient length of time to determine so far out into the future; 2100?
Also, what are the driving factors influencing the study's findings? Are they biased by the funding source? We've already learned that climate change data was manipulated to improve the accuracy of the predictions. I just read recently that 10 years ago Al Gore predicted that the north polar ice cap would be completely gone in only five years, yet the ice is still there. Oops!
Do the scientists take into account the possibility of weather cycles which we have no data on to give us any insight into whether cooler, or wetter, periods occurred? Wasn't the front page of Time magazine in the '70s warning us about scientific studies which predicted a coming ice age which could threaten our future prosperity?
But what really confused me was the paragraph near the bottom of the article which stated one suggestion to deal with future water shortage was to encourage farmers to flood their fields in wetter years to allow the groundwater table to replenish. Does this make sense to you?
If water runoff from the mountain range is going to be declining over the next several decades, why would they want to not conserve water more carefully when natural processes already cause the underground water table to replenish from percolating into the ground during runoff from higher elevations?
And then there's the documented fact that the state's utility company, PG&E, falsified records which contributed to the recent wildfires which killed nearly 100 people, as well as the government's actions, or failure to act in the proper way to deal with their already existing water shortage, has added immensely to the problem.
But the more I read it, the more I wondered how this "study" could make such projections implying that snowfall would continue to shrink causing diminishing runoff into the San Juaquin Valley which runs north and south to the central portion of the state.
I like to think that our advancements in science are providing us with more accurate and reliable information, but the article simply fails to explain adequately to the reader how those who conducted the study can project rainfall in the mountain range so far into the future.
I say this because I get the sense that there are various factors which play into such studies. For starters, the article cites data for weather back to the 1880s. Is that really sufficient length of time to determine so far out into the future; 2100?
Also, what are the driving factors influencing the study's findings? Are they biased by the funding source? We've already learned that climate change data was manipulated to improve the accuracy of the predictions. I just read recently that 10 years ago Al Gore predicted that the north polar ice cap would be completely gone in only five years, yet the ice is still there. Oops!
Do the scientists take into account the possibility of weather cycles which we have no data on to give us any insight into whether cooler, or wetter, periods occurred? Wasn't the front page of Time magazine in the '70s warning us about scientific studies which predicted a coming ice age which could threaten our future prosperity?
But what really confused me was the paragraph near the bottom of the article which stated one suggestion to deal with future water shortage was to encourage farmers to flood their fields in wetter years to allow the groundwater table to replenish. Does this make sense to you?
If water runoff from the mountain range is going to be declining over the next several decades, why would they want to not conserve water more carefully when natural processes already cause the underground water table to replenish from percolating into the ground during runoff from higher elevations?
And then there's the documented fact that the state's utility company, PG&E, falsified records which contributed to the recent wildfires which killed nearly 100 people, as well as the government's actions, or failure to act in the proper way to deal with their already existing water shortage, has added immensely to the problem.
America's Amnesia
If aliens from outer space were to burst onto the scene today and threaten the world's survival of the human race, I sometimes wonder if we would forget our differences and unite to at least attempt fending them off.
The partisan rancor being displayed today from both wings of the Democrat Party of our nation - Pelosi/Schumer/Schiff/Watters/et al, and the Media - reveals that our culture has lost any modicum of social courtesy or decency.
Seventy odd years ago this nation went through a similar situation, only from another nation across the "pond". Everyone did their part to support the massive effort it took for our nation to completely shift its massive industrial and human resources to win the battle against not only Japan, but only a week later, Germany in Europe.
Today, it would be questionable at best whether we would be able to take on two nations threatening our sovereignty and freedom; never mind the idea of a possible alien invasion.
The thought of such a circumstance begs the question, is it possible for our nation to turn itself around and recover the social and cultural situation we enjoyed and thought would continue 70 or 80 years ago?
As I've stated a few times in past posts here, I tend to believe that our development of mass media has become the tool by which our nation's social and cultural climate has been manipulated and gradually taken over by insidious and destructive elements which have morphed our younger generations into being ignorant about what their country was, to one obsessively focusing on constant dissatisfaction; demanding change while throwing out the "baby with the bathwater", or the freedoms and liberty we now enjoy.
Disagree? Consider the fact that we are now seeing a movement among the youth which is focusing on race as qualifying factor for most everything. Are they even aware of what M.L.K. Jr. stood for in his fight for racial equality? And then there's the trend towards completely erasing the 2nd amendment of our Constitution!
Today we have the establishment of media - powerful conglomerate corporations - who are doing their best to distract and mesmerize its viewers by entertaining them with predominantly adolescent level shows which persistently belittle the elders of its society and give only the information about events both nationally and globally that they see fit to share.
On the other hand, we have one or two media outlets who are doing their best to inform those who are cognizant of what the massive media conglomerates are putting out, of what is not being told to the masses.
How does the nation's amnesia factor into this? Here's one glaring example regarding the current immigration crisis from the Heritage Foundation:
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
To anyone who is actually thinking clearly, it's obvious that the politicians -- both liberal and conservative - are counting on American Amnesia to stay in power with the help of the Media (D).
The partisan rancor being displayed today from both wings of the Democrat Party of our nation - Pelosi/Schumer/Schiff/Watters/et al, and the Media - reveals that our culture has lost any modicum of social courtesy or decency.
Seventy odd years ago this nation went through a similar situation, only from another nation across the "pond". Everyone did their part to support the massive effort it took for our nation to completely shift its massive industrial and human resources to win the battle against not only Japan, but only a week later, Germany in Europe.
Today, it would be questionable at best whether we would be able to take on two nations threatening our sovereignty and freedom; never mind the idea of a possible alien invasion.
The thought of such a circumstance begs the question, is it possible for our nation to turn itself around and recover the social and cultural situation we enjoyed and thought would continue 70 or 80 years ago?
As I've stated a few times in past posts here, I tend to believe that our development of mass media has become the tool by which our nation's social and cultural climate has been manipulated and gradually taken over by insidious and destructive elements which have morphed our younger generations into being ignorant about what their country was, to one obsessively focusing on constant dissatisfaction; demanding change while throwing out the "baby with the bathwater", or the freedoms and liberty we now enjoy.
Disagree? Consider the fact that we are now seeing a movement among the youth which is focusing on race as qualifying factor for most everything. Are they even aware of what M.L.K. Jr. stood for in his fight for racial equality? And then there's the trend towards completely erasing the 2nd amendment of our Constitution!
Today we have the establishment of media - powerful conglomerate corporations - who are doing their best to distract and mesmerize its viewers by entertaining them with predominantly adolescent level shows which persistently belittle the elders of its society and give only the information about events both nationally and globally that they see fit to share.
On the other hand, we have one or two media outlets who are doing their best to inform those who are cognizant of what the massive media conglomerates are putting out, of what is not being told to the masses.
How does the nation's amnesia factor into this? Here's one glaring example regarding the current immigration crisis from the Heritage Foundation:
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
In 2008, as Speaker of the House, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said, “we certainly don’t want anymore [illegal immigrants] coming in." |
---|
In 2009, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said, “illegal immigration is wrong, plain and simple.” |
---|
Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) said we must “stop the inflood of illegal immigrants into this country,” in 2005:
= = = = = = = = =
To anyone who is actually thinking clearly, it's obvious that the politicians -- both liberal and conservative - are counting on American Amnesia to stay in power with the help of the Media (D).
Tuesday, December 11, 2018
Is Google Honest About Their Policies?
During a recent Congressional hearing with the CEO of Google Congressman Jim Jordan (R) Ohio, questioned Sundar Pichai about his company's head of Multi-Cultural Marketing and what she stated in an email to the CEO one day after the recent mid-term elections last month.
What was revealed by the Congressman about this department head's remarks was quite interesting to say the least, and amusing as to the CEO's response when pressured by Rep. Jordan regarding three words in her sentences in two different places.
The C-SPAN3 video on MRCTV's site is worth watching to understand just how much effort this tech behemoth is putting into elections for the left's benefit. And this example is only one of many. The real question you must ask yourself while watching this video is, "Do I believe the CEO with his response to the Congressman's questioning, or not?"
In a related article from MRCNewsBusters, the Daily Caller has documented evidence that reveals how conservative news sources were downranked on their search engine.
P.S. If, for some inexplicable reason - most likely one of those technical glitches like the one Google used to explain why four conservative Congressman had their campaign accounts blocked by Google during the campaign season - this blog goes down (is shut down) since this blog is on their blogspot site, you'll understand why.
What was revealed by the Congressman about this department head's remarks was quite interesting to say the least, and amusing as to the CEO's response when pressured by Rep. Jordan regarding three words in her sentences in two different places.
The C-SPAN3 video on MRCTV's site is worth watching to understand just how much effort this tech behemoth is putting into elections for the left's benefit. And this example is only one of many. The real question you must ask yourself while watching this video is, "Do I believe the CEO with his response to the Congressman's questioning, or not?"
In a related article from MRCNewsBusters, the Daily Caller has documented evidence that reveals how conservative news sources were downranked on their search engine.
P.S. If, for some inexplicable reason - most likely one of those technical glitches like the one Google used to explain why four conservative Congressman had their campaign accounts blocked by Google during the campaign season - this blog goes down (is shut down) since this blog is on their blogspot site, you'll understand why.
Monday, December 10, 2018
Who Are the Most Powerful in America?
In answering this question, most of us would immediately say to this question, "Well, the very rich, of course." That was my initial thought when I saw this question.
While this answer may have some merit due to their ability to apply their influence through their wealth, like George Soros, it would actually be incorrect.
In reality, the correct answer is the very thing which I've been screaming about for years in this blog. It is what the progressives implemented to subvert the resistance they met when the nation of voters rejected the kinds of changes they thought the country needed to fit their ideas of how to solve its problems.
One example is what my team of land speed racing enthusiasts encountered when we applied for a permit to run our jet car on a dry mud lake bed in Nevada. For just using the lake bed for a two week period we would have to pay a $37,000 fee AND have both a fire and medic crew present, costing several thousands more. The only way I can make sense of why this government agency is charging what it does is because it either assumes such an effort is funded by some ultra rich guy - which we're not - or, is doing its best to keep anyone from using the publicly owned land that is essentially a complete wasteland in the middle of nowhere.
PragerU has once again posted a new five-minute video which correctly reveals who are the most powerful people in our nation today. While what I've mentioned in the paragraph above may have already revealed who they are, I urge you to watch it and decide for yourself if they aren't the greatest threat to our representative republic.
While this answer may have some merit due to their ability to apply their influence through their wealth, like George Soros, it would actually be incorrect.
In reality, the correct answer is the very thing which I've been screaming about for years in this blog. It is what the progressives implemented to subvert the resistance they met when the nation of voters rejected the kinds of changes they thought the country needed to fit their ideas of how to solve its problems.
One example is what my team of land speed racing enthusiasts encountered when we applied for a permit to run our jet car on a dry mud lake bed in Nevada. For just using the lake bed for a two week period we would have to pay a $37,000 fee AND have both a fire and medic crew present, costing several thousands more. The only way I can make sense of why this government agency is charging what it does is because it either assumes such an effort is funded by some ultra rich guy - which we're not - or, is doing its best to keep anyone from using the publicly owned land that is essentially a complete wasteland in the middle of nowhere.
PragerU has once again posted a new five-minute video which correctly reveals who are the most powerful people in our nation today. While what I've mentioned in the paragraph above may have already revealed who they are, I urge you to watch it and decide for yourself if they aren't the greatest threat to our representative republic.
Thursday, December 6, 2018
Why Has Nothing Come of This?
Back on June 20th of this year 19 members of the House announced a twelve page resolution calling for the establishment of a second special prosecutor for misconduct at the highest levels of the D.O.J. and the F.B.I. regarding the so-called "Russian Collusion" investigation which, after 18 months, has produced not one scintilla of evidence proving it.
Yet, here we are with the Democrats now in control of the House starting next month. What happened to this resolution? Why didn't it go anywhere? Because the Never-Trumpers refused to sign onto the resolution?
Need a reason to understand why I pose that question about the Never-Trumpers? Check this out...
Paul Ryan Busted... Caught Secretly Working With Democrats To Scuttle The Border Wall!
Yet, here we are with the Democrats now in control of the House starting next month. What happened to this resolution? Why didn't it go anywhere? Because the Never-Trumpers refused to sign onto the resolution?
Need a reason to understand why I pose that question about the Never-Trumpers? Check this out...
= = = = = = = = = = = = =
It's the betrayal to end all betrayals. As a matter of fact, if you have a weak stomach, stop reading now.
Prior to the election, Paul Ryan and so-called Republican leaders promised the Trump Administration and the American people that they would FULLY FUND the border wall AFTER the election.
Ryan LIED! Immediately after the election he started to plot... secretly... behind the scenes, to nullify that solemn promise!
And when Ryan's desire for betrayal became apparent to the Trump administration, about a week ago, President Trump summoned Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell to the White House for an emergency meeting... and when all was said and done, all parties agreed that Congress would provide 5 Billion dollars (of the 20-25 billion actually needed) to fund a border wall.
It was also reported that President Trump told Ryan and McConnell that he would veto any spending bill that did not provide the 5 billion and shut down the government.
Now, understand one thing. For the Trump Administration, the offer of 5 billions was a compromise. It was well short of the 20-25 billion needed to fully fund the construction of a physical barrier on the border, but the willingness of the White House to compromise didn't matter to Paul Ryan. He LIED AGAIN... HE LIED TO PRESIDENT TRUMP'S FACE... AND HE LIED THROUGH HIS TEETH!
According to sources on the Hill, immediately after leaving that meeting, Ryan and Company started working on a poison-pill budget resolution that would fully fund disaster relief measures minus the additional funds promised to enhance border security.
You can almost see him grinning from ear-to-ear after leaving the White House grounds... no one... not the President of the United States... and not the American people were going to tell him what to do!
Ryan's intentions are clear. He believes President Trump is bluffing and he's going to call that bluff. He's trying to BLACKMAIL the Trump Administration into TOTAL SURRENDER on border security. He believes that the Trump Administration will not dare to shut down the government over a budget resolution that provides disaster relief... and we're not going to let him get away with it!
And that's why we must call Ryan and Company on the carpet right now! Republicans will only hold the majority in Congress until the end of the month. When Nancy Pelosi gets the Speaker's gavel back, there will be no money allocated to secure our borders and that means that border security MUST HAPPEN NOW!Watching this video from last spring when this press conference took place, will provide you with an extremely long list of evidence which overwhelmingly justifies the need for a full investigation into the massive corruption which went on in the Obama Administration.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)