Modernism, as Jordan Peterson labels it, is gaining societal momentum and control over the use of our language - specifically use of pronouns - with resulting legal consequences in Canada due to the passage of a new law there. That's how crazy it has gotten.
However, in a hearing in which Jordan Peterson was defending his objection of the recently passed law - C16 - in Canada, he answers questions from board members as to how he can possibly refuse to justify not following such a law, as a psychology professor himself, they clearly believe is justified.
It's clear to me that, as someone with a post-graduate degree, this man is a very educated, accomplished and clear thinking individual who has great skill at articulating what most of us would refer to as plain common sense. I strongly urge my readers to watch this video and do their best to follow along with Peterson's rapid explanations which may lose some viewer's ability to follow. However, there is the option of using the controls of the video to replay as much as is needed.
In watching this, my inclination is to ask, "How soon will this trend result in it becoming law here in the United States?" unless we engage in communicating to our elected members of Congress - should it rear its ugly head within this current House of liberal/socialists running rampant with their crazy notions of social justice and all - how we view such a proposal.
Tuesday, January 15, 2019
Monday, January 14, 2019
The Arizona Border
I don't need to say anything more about this than what this video itself reveals.
Sunday, January 13, 2019
Immigrant's Impact on Our Nation
Check it out…
Folks,
this will blow your mind. You can click onto any state and see the
effect that illegals are having on that state. It is a huge problem that
needs to be dealt with quickly. Hang on to this and pass it on to your
Senator or House Rep.
No wonder the coffers are bare and every governor wants to raise taxes. CT is basically flat ass broke.
Check-out
the numbers for California. We’ve known for some time many that most Illegals
don’t pay taxes, because they work for cash, yet they get a lot of
government freebies like food stamps, phones, school, medical,
utilities, rent, etc. (This is what you get when our oversized government creates a welfare state mentality for the nation.)
We appear to be taking care of illegals rather than American citizens who are in actual need of assistance; our homeless.
State by state detailed info-graphics on how much illegals burden you and your state:
Saturday, January 12, 2019
How "Fake News" Happens
This practice has been going on much longer than the president's time in office.
Here's an example; An article is printed, or posted, and it paints a picture of circumstances which causes the reader - the vast majority of who know nothing to very little about the actual circumstances of the situation, or conditions, and based on that information conclude incorrectly.
I'm referring to the technique of facts by omission. The writer's not lied, or deliberately mislead the reader, they've just not included all the pertinent facts which play into the scenario.
Here's a specific example I found this morning: "Tensions rise in federal prisons as weary prison guards go without pay, work double shifts" is the headline (written to report how the partial government shutdown is negatively impacting federal "non-essential" employees):
While I recognize the dangerous and important job they have, I can't help but recall my experience as a young man in the military just out of high school complaining about the conditions (duration of our shifts on the flight line during the end of the Vietnam War) of our job and how someone older than I retorted to me; "You've got nothing to complain about. You enlisted voluntarily, get paid each month, and get three hot meals and a cot to sleep on in your tent. Stop whining and do you job!"
Here's an example; An article is printed, or posted, and it paints a picture of circumstances which causes the reader - the vast majority of who know nothing to very little about the actual circumstances of the situation, or conditions, and based on that information conclude incorrectly.
I'm referring to the technique of facts by omission. The writer's not lied, or deliberately mislead the reader, they've just not included all the pertinent facts which play into the scenario.
Here's a specific example I found this morning: "Tensions rise in federal prisons as weary prison guards go without pay, work double shifts" is the headline (written to report how the partial government shutdown is negatively impacting federal "non-essential" employees):
In order to find this comment, I had to click on a "Comments" button at the bottom of the page to get to another page and read them.Doug Wiser: I was working 16 hour mandatory overtime shifts before I retired and there was no shutdown in effect. Not once a month, several times a week. That is why I retired the day after I became eligible. Around 100 new staff quit in the year we opened a new federal penitentiary. They couldn't get people to stay on the job because of the long hours and no notice that you were going to have to work 16 hours straight from day to day.
While I recognize the dangerous and important job they have, I can't help but recall my experience as a young man in the military just out of high school complaining about the conditions (duration of our shifts on the flight line during the end of the Vietnam War) of our job and how someone older than I retorted to me; "You've got nothing to complain about. You enlisted voluntarily, get paid each month, and get three hot meals and a cot to sleep on in your tent. Stop whining and do you job!"
Thursday, January 10, 2019
Sen. Charles Schumer Wants This Article BANNED From the Internet
by Frank Holmes, reporter
Donald
Trump has said the United States needs a wall on the southern border to
keep out terrorists bent on committing unthinkable crimes against
Americans.
The Democrats and the media say there’s nothing to worry about — that it’s all a “manufactured crisis.”
But
undeniable evidence proves that radical Islamic terrorists have been
crossing into the U.S. through the Southwest for years — and Senate
Minority Leader Chuck Schumer does NOT want American voters to know
about it.
A little-publicized article ripped the lid off just one terrorist pathway from the Middle East into the U.S.
Terrorists
from Iran, Pakistan, Iraq and other state sponsors of terror fly into
South America and cross into Panama and Costa Rica on their way to the
Rio Grande… and our allies know all about it!
Todd Bensman of the Center for Immigration Studies
went to Panama and Costa Rica to report on this terrorist pipeline
firsthand for The Federalist. He revealed shocking details about the
life-threatening plot.
As
many as 700 illegal immigrants a week cross into Panama, where the
government lets them rest before helping them move closer to the United
States.
The governments call the program “Controlled Flow” — because the illegals and terrorists just keep flowing toward the U.S.!
Once they reach Costa Rica, they rest in Golfito camp for a few days.
But
officials in both countries tip off the U.S. if there are terrorists in
the pack — like when they arrested Ibrahim Qoordheen, a Somalian
suspected to be a terrorist affiliated with Al-Shabaab, an Al-Qaeda
affiliate.
But
sometimes the terrorists slip through the cracks — like “upwards of 100
people” who were smuggled from the Middle East to the U.S. by Sharafat
Ali Khan.
Illegals
from Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Bangladesh paid Khan up to $15,000
apiece for him to get them into the U.S. Some of them hoped to wage
jihad against innocent Americans on U.S. soil.
“Several of the individuals smuggled by Khan’s organization had suspected ties to terrorist organizations,” according to ICE, which deported Khan to Pakistan last December.
Officials said one of the Afghanis had family members in the Taliban, and that he planned to commit terrorist acts after he crossed the U.S. border with Mexico.
Khan may be the most successful terrorist-smuggler busted by immigration authorities, but there are so many others.
The
same month that ICE — the organization Congressional Democrats want to
abolish — sent Khan packing, the international police organization
INTERPOL also arrested illegals with ties to terrorism who were trying to enter the U.S. through Mexico.
This has been going on for years… while previous administrations did absolutely nothing about it.
Back in September 2014, Texas officials arrested four Turks who were affiliated with a terrorist organization after they crossed the border.
“This
incident proves what enforcement experts have always known, and that is
there are existing networks in Mexico and Central America that have
been set up and cultivated by a variety of terrorist organizations to
enable them to move people into the United States illegally,” said
Jessica Vaughan of CIS at the time.
Donald Trump is right; there’s just no denying it (unless you’re the Fake News media).
NBC
News tried to downplay the fact that federal agents nabbed “just 6
immigrants on US-Mexico border in first half of fiscal year 2018 whose
names were on a federal government list of known or suspected
terrorists.”
“Just”?!
How many would be acceptable, then?
The networks may try to cover for the Democrats but people have already suffered because of our wide-open borders.
Abdulahi Hasan Sharif allegedly stabbed a police officer before he ran over four people with a U-Haul in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, on September 30, 2017.
Sharif, who was affiliated with Al-Shabaab, had an ISIS flag in his car.
And guess how he got to Canada? He took the same route from his native Somalia to Brazil, and then through the U.S. border with Mexico. He just decided to move on to Canada, where he is charged with five counts of attempted murder.
How
can Democrats sleep at night knowing that their open borders policies
left blood on the streets of Edmonton — and blood on their hands?
“I
believe what is happening right now at the border is that the Democrats
are putting the lives of others who are coming to our country—trying to
come in illegally—ahead of the rights of Americans who are here,” Rep.
Doug Collins, GA-R, told PBS on Wednesday. “I believe the president is
putting Americans first. I believe he is putting our citizenry first.”
Build the wall!
— Frank Holmes is a reporter for The Horn News.
He is a veteran journalist and an outspoken conservative that talks
about the news that was in his weekly article, “On The Holmes Front.”
Wednesday, January 9, 2019
Cringworthy Response By Democrats
In analyzing the Democratic response to Pres. Trump's prime time address to the nation last night, Lyin' Bryan Williams on MSNBC couldn't escape laughing with his two hosts about how it came across to the nation.
Check out this script and video via MRC-TV's site which featured it. I especially couldn't help laughing with them when James Carville mentioned what he looked forward to more, than watching responses to presidential addresses.
In case you missed the President's address, here it is.
Tuesday, January 8, 2019
Examples of Biased Ignorance
I've posted remarks on this blog for months, if not years, pointing out how the public in general are easily manipulated and biased against a particular view, or ideology.
But this video from Campus Reform via MRC-TV demonstrates beautifully how successful and effective the Media (D) is on the younger generations who, in the circumstance in this video reveals, are unaware of just how uninformed they really are and that they need to stop and engage in the world around them, rather than just accepting what they hear at face value.
And yes, I include conservatives in the above statement as well, since many of us are just as capable of accepting things without thinking critically and verifying our sources.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)