Patterns of Obfuscation & Diversion

I've watched several different shows over the past several months of a variety of focus and interest about the daily development regarding the Democrat's post election claim that there was supposedly collusion between Trump's campaign people and Russia in order to influence the election. When any liberal/democrat is a guest on these different shows that are discussing this topic, I've notice a consistent pattern of response from them all... don't answer the direct questions requiring supportive facts and evidence, instead they obfuscate and divert to the talking points which they so persistently use to further the claim for which they've not yet produced one single shred of verifiable evidence; "There have been a multitude of reports about this.", or "We now know that the DNC's and Podesta's emails were hacked and disclosed things which ruined her chances of winning the election.", or "Look, Trump, during the campaign, asked at one of his appearances, for Russia to find Hillary's 30,000 emails that the F.B.I. couldn't find. Isn't that a clear piece of evidence that he was asking for Russia to help him win?" (Never mind that liberals have no sense of humor when it comes to what really counts... maintaining control of the reigns of power.)

First, this type of response is clearly used by them to not only perpetuate their fabrication for the uninformed masses who only catch the 30 second sound bites to determine what's going on and new, but is also to divert from exposing what their true purpose of this meme is because they know that if they actually said, "Well, yes, we realize we don't have any evidence which would actually convict Trump, but that's not important here. What we're actually doing here is discrediting this man who is destroying our control of the situation and we just can't have that!" their whole con about misleading the public would be up.

Let's get real here, when the mainstream media outlets like CNN, ABC, NBC, etc. don't even cover as news revelations about Susan Rice, who was the National Security Advisor for the former president, requesting the unmasking of Americans (Trump campaign transition people had to communicate with various foreign countries for the purpose of establishing relations with the new administration, like every previous new administration has done.) who were supposed to be obscured, or redacted, under the law, and instead they react by coming to her defense with insinuations that those who are coming out with these revelations are just sexist, racist, and political maneuvers by the Trump administration to attack the former administration's credibility, we're stepping way beyond to whole purpose of media's role in covering developments and reporting them. Instead, the mainstream media is clearly supportive of the narrative that has been made up to accomplish the very thing they assert conservatives are doing. This lends validation to the point that liberals are quick to say about their opposition what they themselves are doing covertly.

Look at this whole situation from a different angle. If the "shoe was on the other foot", and Hillary had won the election, and Republican Congressman and FOX News were claiming that her campaign people had collaborated with Vladimir Putin to change the votes, would we even hear from the media about the Republican's claim? Of course not! Yet, what are the Democrats in Congress doing? They're spending all their time focusing the nation on a claim which they can't produce any evidence to support it. But, that doesn't stop them from filibustering actions in the Republican majority Congress. They're not spending much, if any, attention on helping to make the nation better off and in fulfilling their primary role of protecting the nation and stimulating the economy. Quite the opposite!  And all because they didn't win. If the tables were reversed and it was the Republicans who'd lost the last election and were doing what the Democrats are doing, what do you think would be the meme in the news today? "President Clinton is doing such a great job working with all the other countries around the globe to build a coalition of unity and the Republicans are just acting like cry babies about it all."

To me, this whole news situation our nation is experiencing is just a clarification of the fact that manipulation of the masses has become so much easier when liberals understand well how to implement Saul Alinsky's strategies to, "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." So, the next time you're watching Tucker Carlson's show, or any other journalist who's still actually trying to report the news and not defend the liberals, pay closer attention, if you haven't already been, and see if you can notice what's been glaringly obvious to me.

N.C. Middle-School Science Teacher Hospitalized Over Student Prank!

It's disturbing, but I am not surprised to learn of this particular incident. Is it the first time it's happened? I seriously doubt it, and it won't be the last, either! 

My big question is... What type of consequences will the school district meet out on the students who committed this potentially life threatening "prank" if something more toxic been chosen. Also, if the district doesn't give the teacher at least the option to instruct another class by arranging for a swap, or transfer, then they'll be creating a hostile work environment.

What happened? Well, you be the one to determine its severity, and use this link to read the article.

I guess I could count my blessings, as a former middle-school science teacher retiree, that this kind of malicious act didn't happen to me. 

To illustrate just how far our modern societal culture has deviated from our past, I'm providing this scenario shared by a friend of mine about the difference of public schools when we were students and today:

HIGH SCHOOL --  1957  vs  2016

Scenario 1:

Jack goes duck hunting before school and then pulls into the school parking lot with his shotgun in his truck's gun rack.

1957 -  Vice Principal comes over, looks at Jack's shotgun, goes to his car and gets his shotgun to show Jack.

2016 -  School goes into lock down, FBI called,  Jack hauled off to jail and never sees his truck or gun again.  Counselors called in for traumatized students and teachers.

Scenario 2:

Johnny and Mark get into a fist fight after school.

1957 -  Crowd gathers. Mark wins. Johnny and Mark shake hands and end up buddies.

2016 -  Police called and SWAT team arrives -- they arrest both Johnny and Mark.   They are both charged with assault and both expelled - even though Johnny started it .

Scenario 3:

Jeffrey will not be in class, he disrupts other students.

 1957 -  Jeffrey sent to the Principal's office and given a good paddling by the Principal.  He then returns to class, sits still and does not disrupt class again.

2016 -  Jeffrey is given huge doses of Ritalin.  He becomes a zombie.  He is then tested for ADD.  The family gets extra money (SSI) from the government because Jeffrey has a disability.

Scenario 4:

Billy breaks a window in his neighbor's car and his Dad gives him a whipping. 

1957 -  Billy is more careful next time, grows up normal, goes to college and  becomes a successful businessman.

2016 -  Billy's dad is arrested for child abuse. Billy is removed to foster care and joins a gang.  The state psychologist is told by Billy's sister that she remembers being spanked herself and their dad goes to prison.  Billy's mom has an affair with the psychologist.

Scenario 5:

Mark gets a headache and takes some aspirin to school.

1957 -  Mark shares his aspirin with the Principal out on the smoking dock . 2016 -  The police are called and Mark is expelled from school for drug violations.  His car is then searched for drugs and weapons.

Scenario 6:

Pedro fails high school English.

1957 -  Pedro goes to summer school, passes English and goes to college.

2016 -  Pedro's cause is taken up by a radical group. Newspaper articles appear nationally explaining that teaching English as a requirement for graduation is racist.  ACLU files a class action lawsuit against the state school system and Pedro's English teacher.  English is then banned from the basic curriculum.  Pedro is given his diploma anyway, but ends up mowing lawns for a living because he cannot speak English.

Scenario 7:

Johnny takes apart leftover firecrackers from the Fourth of July, puts them in a model airplane paint bottle and blows up a red ant bed.

1957 -  Ants die.

2016 -  ATF, Homeland Security and the FBI are all called.  Johnny is charged with domestic terrorism.   The FBI investigates his parents - and all siblings are removed from their home. All computers are confiscated.  Johnny's dad is placed on a terror watch list and is never allowed to fly again.

Scenario 8:

Johnny falls while running during recess and scrapes his knee .   He is found crying by his teacher, Mary.  Mary hugs him to comfort him.

1957   - In a short time, Johnny feels better and goes on playing.

2016  - Mary is accused of being a sexual predator and loses her job.  She faces 3 years in State Prison.  Johnny undergoes 5 years of therapy.

This is - By Far - More Significant Than Watergate!

 With the Democrats having lost the race they were so confident they'd win last fall, and in collusion with the mainstream media, the new narrative after their stunned recovery was to promote the suspicions that Trump's campaign team was working with the Russian government to steal the election.

Despite not one shred of evidence having been found to date, there has been evidence revealed only days ago that the Obama administration's National Security Advisor - directly to the president - had requested the unmasking, or revealing of names of Trump campaign transition officials - which is illegal - for what appears to be strictly political motives in an effort to gain something by which the Democrats could discredit them and thereby turn the election defeat around by promoting an impeachment proceeding based on what they found. Anyone following these developments knows that this is rapidly beginning to blow up in the Democrats face as more revelations come forward. Use the caption link below the cartoon for a great analysis from Ann Coulter.

The Russian Emperor's New Clothes

Here's the recent statement by the president of the Media Research Center regarding this, confirming the collusion of the mainstream media with the Democrats:

A major bombshell was dropped yesterday involving Obama National Security Advisor Susan Rice and efforts to unmask Trump transition team members picked up through surveillance efforts after the November election. Not surprisingly, the liberal media attempted to cover up the developing scandal.

CNN’s Chris Cuomo labelled the story “another fake scandal.”
MRC President Brent Bozell just released a statement slamming the media for their shameful defense of Susan Rice’s involvement in the unmasking scandal.

Here is Brent’s full statement:

“The liberal media’s ‘nothing to see here’ approach to Susan Rice’s politically-motivated unmasking of Trump associates in sensitive intelligence material is shameful. You’d think someone who lied to the press and the American people about her role in the unmasking just two weeks ago would invite more scrutiny. We have a smoking gun that points to criminal activity by President Obama’s national security advisor and the media have shown an utter lack of interest in pursuing the story. If this story is not a top priority for every news outlet, they are aiding and abetting a cover-up. President Trump has every right to be furious with the press and the American people have every reason to be disgusted."

Please share this with your social network and stay tuned as we keep you up to date on the media’s coverage of this scandalous story.
Sincerely,
David Martin
Executive Vice President
Media Research Center

P.S. Are you sick of the liberal media covering up the TRUTH? Click here to support our efforts.

The History of the Democratic Party

Too often we base our viewpoints on information we believe is correct based on current circumstance and knowledge of our day. However, when one takes an historically accurate look at the topic, one's views are often changed when new information reveals a different story.

In a new series on the history of the Democratic Party, like the previous one I've posted here about Communism, Glenn Beck provides us with a more accurate look back at the real history of how the Democratic Party has evolved since 1830. 

Hey, What's So Wrong With Socialism?

Yea, it's cool, right? Think again! You have no real idea what you're supporting.

Watch this video and tell me again why it's so cool.

Moms Declare Holy War on N.J. School

Just when you thought the public schools of indoctrination had gone full-blown leftist...

Are public schools supposed to focus on one, or all, religions in a class on World Cultures and Geography? Apparently this question is of no concern in a Chatham, New Jersey middle-school. No, its only focus is on the five pillars of Islam.

A pair of moms have asked some questions, but have been ignored by the district, so they've sought legal counsel to deal with the issue. I suspect that this same sort of situation is occurring in other districts around the nation, but it just hasn't been disclosed yet. 

And, when this is all said and done, I predict no monetary penalties, or lost positions of administrators, in the school district will be forthcoming.

Fake News

Jessie Waters - of Water's World - on FOX News, recently gave an epic monologue on this topic. Anyone who follows the developments of what's been transpiring in national politics for the last year knows who's pushing this and why.