"Lock Her Up!" Is Political Ranting?

No... it's a demand for law and order, justice and equal treatment under it! There is a big difference.

As part of CBS's live coverage on Wednesday of the Alexandria shooting, discussion by Charlie Rose included the shooter's political rants on his social media posts. Rose also pointed out the chanting at Trump's campaign rallies of "Lock Her Up!" and equated them as just as incendiary as the shooters to illustrate the heightened political rhetoric now dominating our nation's divided condition.

But, for those who accept the media's false narrative about conservatives' motives and behavior, it seems perfectly logical. After all, it's their job to "carry the water" for the Democrat Party by pounding the meme and stir the emotions and concerns of their zombie hoards in the urban centers of America. These talking heads on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and other leftist oriented networks are skewed in their views because they've no real sense of America in "flyover country" and the "heartland" of our nation lives, works, raises their family and does its best to abide by the laws of our land.

This middle-America, and those who understand what's been done to divide our country during the previous administration - and the examples are too legion to recite here from that eight year period - were expressing in that chant their frustration that the opposing candidate had clearly broken the law, yet understood that, because of her position as an elite, she would never be prosecuted and sentenced. And the top law enforcement cop of the land had let her off the hook!

They were tired of hearing from the failed attempt at healing the land by electing a first black president that told them "they didn't build that". Instead, they got more and more divisive meddling in matters which normally a president wouldn't involve himself in; like his "Beer Summit", and the multitude of social justice issues; Treyvon Martin, et al. 

They were frustrated that their nation, which had in the past won two world wars at the great sacrifice of their own brothers and fathers, couldn't deal with a growing threat of ISIS because he clearly had an ideological bias towards not calling them what they were; Radical Islamic Terrorism! Yet, they saw the influx of immigrants invading their communities - forced by the federal agencies tasked to do so - who are not assimilating into our culture and at the same time demanding that their expectations are respected and observed. To any sane person, that is social and cultural suicide!

They realized that such a chant would send the clear message to the nation that such a reality is not acceptable to a sector of society who would most certainly have seen others in positions of lesser power, have been convicted and sentenced for lesser crimes. They had to make a statement which said, "Enough is enough! We want justice, not excuses and empty promises. We're tired of being ignored by those who we elected!" They had to vent, but NO ONE ever went out and acted on those frustrations by shooting at any Democrat politicians!

There is a huge difference here!

Why You Love Capitalism

Watching this five minute video nicely explains why everyone loves capitalism, whether they realize it, or not. Perhaps you can share it with your socialist friends who think what's happening in Venezuela is a cool thing.

Sadly, the Rhetoric Continues

In the tragic aftermath of the Alexandria, VA shooting on June 14th of the Republican Congressman and their aides practicing for today's baseball game, there were those in the media - in this particular instance - the New York Times newspaper editorial board - who just had to keep up the rhetoric which has helped to contribute to enraging those who believe what they hear, or see without question, in the news by acting on it. (The irony of this is that the leftists' meme is that it is the conservatives, Tea Party, Republicans, and especially Trump, who are the ones inciting violence.)

For those who are actually paying attention to what's going on and having any degree of critical thinking skills which allow them to realize the shift which has occurred in our mainstream media over the last few decades, it should be obvious and apparent that they no longer report "just the facts, mam!" (who, what, when, where and why), but instead interlace predominantly leftist opinions into much of their news reports today.

And, while the elected representatives in D.C. have been quick to call for a halt to the rhetoric on both sides of the isle, there are those in the media who just can't let go and don't realize this is a time to hold off on the ridiculous attack and accusations which are not about policies or issues, but about the character of individuals and those in the opposing party. Like post 9/11 it is doubtful that the rhetoric from the politicians will cease for long; even Rep. Pelosi of CA was quick to comment disparagingly about the other party earlier today! She's SO steeped in party ideology, that she can't even see how she's coming across in making such a statement!

For an interesting perspective on this matter, I invite you to read and listen to Glenn Beck's comments about this issue on who in the long list of who's to blame.

The following is a response from the Media Research Center; an organization that monitors and reports on media bias.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Yesterday, the New York Times Editorial Board wrote an editorial that read, in part:

“In 2011, when Jared Lee Loughner opened fire in a supermarket parking lot, grievously wounding Representative Gabby Giffords and killing six people, including a 9-year-old girl, the link to political incitement was clear.”

Later, they went on to say about yesterday’s shooting in Alexandria, Virginia:

“Though there’s no sign of incitement as direct as in the Giffords attack …”

MRC President Brent Bozell issued the following statement blasting the New York Times Editorial Board for their intentionally fallacious editorial:

“The New York Times Editorial Board should be embarrassed by the flaming pile of garbage they published today. Even in the face of a radical leftist's attempted assassination of numerous members of Congress, they try to find a way to cast blame on ... conservatives! Their editorial perpetuates a long-debunked leftist conspiracy theory about Gov. Sarah Palin inciting the Giffords shooting. They know better. The New York Times ’ own news reporters declared just yesterday that there was no evidence linking Palin to the Giffords shooting!

“If the New York Times Editorial Board is going to declare that one cannot place blame on Sen. Sanders for the Alexandria shooting, they must apologize to Gov. Palin for dragging her name through the mud to score cheap political points.”

By Any Means Necessary!

In stepping back from the minutia of various news stories, leaks, and claims by an array of "swamp creatures" in Washington, D.C., I have begun to construct what I believe has most likely gone on behind this whole charade. Here's my summation of it all without getting into the weeds on it:

Unable, unwilling, or both, to accept the results of the presidential campaign liberals at the top of the establishment food chain in our nation's political arena, a meeting - or at least a dialog in some way - was initiated within only days of the election to devise a way to try and reverse, or change the outcome as much as possible, so that the Democrats can maintain at least a modicum of control in Congress other than what they already have succeeded in controlling by moderating some of the Republicans in Congress.

How to achieve this objective is their desperate effort to combat the growing loss in elections over the past administration's eight year term in the White House. From all of what's transpired over the past eight months of this evolving case it appears that the liberal establishment - most likely led by Hillary and close friends of the campaign - determined that since their previous coup in 1974 against Pres. Nixon was ultimately successful in forcing him to resign, and that their total collusion with the mainstream media has now become an even more efficient and effective means by which to influence the voter base about what is happening, a similar campaign against Pres. Trump must be carried out to oust him from the White House. (Let's not forget who was a member of that investigation team against Nixon then; that's right, Hillary Rodham who was ultimately kicked off the team due to her dishonesty and efforts to hide documents and records pertaining to the investigation.)

Given that Pres. Obama supported Hillary's campaign, and, given that we now have reason to believe that F.B.I. Director Comey's appointment by the then "Golfer-in-Chief" for being in command of an agency that would carry out the liberals' long range objectives should an unexpected outcome occur (see my post titled, "The Corruption's Deeper Than We Thought!") I believe Comey is the Democrat's inside operative to sabotage and hinder Trump's administrative efforts to even begin to turn the ship of state off its current course towards an ever growing socialistic state of cradle to grave control.

I understand that anyone reading this theory might object by saying, "No! Why would Comey sacrifice himself as the "patsy" for the Democrats with the possibility of going to prison if his disclosure of his leaking information to the press through his college buddy and not calling Lynch on her demand to him for calling it a "matter" rather than the investigation it was? That just doesn't make sense!" It doesn't make sense that he's already testified that those two things occurred, either. But, my speculation - and knowing the liberal establishment as I do - I wouldn't be surprised that they've told Comey, "Hey look, if you'll do this for us, once we're back in power in 2021, then we'll pardon your sentence to get you out and set you up comfortably for the rest of your life!" I know this theory sounds rather "out there", but you can't discount the absurdity of what's gone on in other significant issue which have been revealed about how the liberals have made claims and manipulated those revelations via the mainstream media! The current handling of the Alexandria, VA shooting of Congressional members and staff by the liberals/leftists by connecting it in their weird way to the Gifford incident of 2011 to motivate the P.O.S. that carried out the Alexandria shootings the other day, is our most current example of why I say this.

An article in the National Review posted today by former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy on this whole effort to claim that Pres. Trump is now under investigation for obstruction of justice by Muller - the special prosecutor who's a close friend of Comey's (which is, BTW, not allowed under the rules for being appointed and the media is doing their best to maintain the meme that Muller is untouchable and "pure as the driven snow" as to his unbiased position in all of this) - poses a question which supports my theory I've posed. See what you think.

Then too, Ann Coulter has now chimed in with her own masterfully written column article about this whole issue. In doing so, she documents the reaction of the leftists when candidate Trump refused to say he'd accept the outcome of the election as the hypocrites they are.

There Will Be No Gain Without A Lot of Pain

Even if Pres. Trump never had any opposition from the Democrats, his efforts to turn the prosperity of our nation around would not happen without a lot of economic pain due to our nation's history of how out current monetary system is structured. As this video will explain, getting us out of the position of being a debtor nation - as opposed to a creditor nation - a near total collapse would be experienced by our entire country before things could turn around.

I do not share this information to cause anyone to be more depressed than circumstances are already creating, but to help them understand that our current circumstances are the way they are because of this circumstance in our global banking system.

Here's the statement placed underneath the video:

"Most people’s lives are dedicated to money. It’s all people ever worry about or talk about. People train to learn the skills to get jobs to trade hours of their lives for money. But where does money come from? And who controls it? This 21-minute video from ColdFusion explains it all."

The Umbrella - A Touching Story...

On a rainy afternoon, a group of protesters were gathered outside the grocery store handing out pamphlets on the evils of America.  I politely declined to take one. 

 

There was an elderly woman behind me and a young (20-ish) female protester offered her a pamphlet, which she politely declined. 

  

The young protester gently put her hand on the old woman's shoulder and in a patronizing voice said, "Don't you care about the children of Iraq?"  

 

The old woman looked up at her and said: "Honey, my father died in France during World War II, I lost my husband in Korea, and a son in Vietnam.  All three died so a naive, ignorant, self centered bimbo like you could have the right to stand here and badmouth our country, and if you touch me again, I'll shove this umbrella up your ass and open it."

Liberals and Democrats Are Backtracking Now

The bars in Washington, D.C. opened at 9:00 a.m. The alcohol was being consumed by the mostly liberal bureaucrats almost immediately in order to be well "lubricated" for celebrating what they believed would be the final nail in the figurative coffin of Pres. Trump's residency in the White House.

Then, the testimony of former F.B.I. Director James Comey began, and within the first quarter of an hour after it began, the bars were filled with nothing but long faced shock that his testimony was not what they'd expected to hear. What happened? The media had told them that Comey was going to lower the boom on "The Donald", after all, and they believed this meme just like they believed that Hillary was going to win the election. How could this be?

The rest of the day was somber; spent concocting a way to come out of this whole thing looking smarter than the embarrassment that had just occurred. So, the talking heads and other leftist officials began claiming that they never stated that the President was under investigation. But, that's not what Dan McLaughlin, reporter for the National Review, points out in his article on this very point. 

Don't forget... Comey also revealed in his testimony on Thursday that A.G. Lynch encouraged him to call the investigation a "matter", rather than call the Clinton email scandal what it actually was; an investigation! But, if you understand just how the "Swamp" creatures operate, you know that most likely, nothing will come of the A.G. for her accepting Bill Clinton onto her aircraft on the Arizona tarmac only days before Comey's testimony on July 5th. (He laid out all the illegal activities Hillary engaged in, but then claimed she didn't show sufficient "intent" to prosecute her.) Dick Morris, former advisor to both Bill and Hillary, believes Comey should be prosecuted. Why not? Petraus was, and convicted for a lesser crime!

Remember this?

Rush Limbaugh, in his monologue today, pointed this out. Because of Comey's earlier closed session testimony, all Democrat Congresspersons KNEW that Trump was not under investigation. And, if Schumer, Warren, along with other fellow leftists knew, sure as the sun rises, so did the media. He called the Democrats and the media "reprobates" of the lowest order because they knew this, yet STILL continued promoting the lie that Comey refused to end all of this by not disclosing Trump was never under investigation. This lends greater credence to the article I shared which points out how Comey's appointment by Obama was a deliberate effort to make sure Trump, if elected, would not succeed. He also pointed out that Sen. Rubio asked what is probably the most critical issue of the whole eight month investigation: Why was this fact of truth the ONE thing which was the one thing which was not leaked?

Welcome to the machinations of the "Swamp"! The corruption of our political system is so corrupt it takes someone with the level of Trump's experience in New York as a property developer to understand how to negotiate the unbelievable quantity of crocodiles waiting to eat you alive.