Well, It Took Only 33 Years to Happen!

George Orwell warned us with his classic book "1984" and now we've finally arrived; so what if he was off by 33 years? CNN's threatening an individual with "exposure" of their identity for exercising their free speech rights in a satirical manner by producing a GIF of Trump body slamming a CNN logo to the floor is, in my view, equivalent to what Orwell prophesied about "state control"and "newspeak".

Here's what the Trump Train News posted regarding this issue. I ask you to note the very last line from CNN's statement on this. Question: Who gave CNN authority or power over an individual person's free speech rights? 

Here's MRCTV's video with Brittany Hughes explaining this issue with a bit more verbal clarity.

Ridiculous, you say? Watch this video, think about what it's pointing out, then you may realize there's a valid point here.

Oh, BTW, what happened to the protection of expressions of art (comedy and video production)? These same people have defended others who've created offensive displays like a jar of urine with a cross in it. I guess it's alright to offend Christians, but not any other faith? There's that pesky "double standard" of the liberals again.

Was America Founded to Be Secular?

Most of today's liberal/leftists would tell us "Yes!" However, if we study the actual views of our nation's Founding Fathers, we would learn quite the opposite. Watch this Prager U video to learn the reasons why they felt religion was a necessary factor in a free society while being very cautious about not allowing for a government recognized "religion of the state".

As a student of history, I've researched what I believe is the dominant influence of this view by the Founding Fathers; Masonry. To anyone who's studied this topic it is apparent that this organization, which was a prevalent societal influence during the period of the founding of the United States, accepted members into Masonic Lodges around the world without respect to any one particular religion, but viewed all faiths as revering the same universal creator.

Want Evidence of Voter Fraud?

This Bill Whittle video addresses two main issues: One, the process by which one must expose the media's double standard, and two, the issue of voter fraud in our elections by revealing how the media bias in its reporting is influencing the election outcomes over at least the last decade or more. If one recalls the list of 45 objectives that the Communist Party USA has been diligently working on for several decades in the U.S., then this evidence makes perfect sense.

Here are two other related articles:

• More Than Half of U.S. State Refuse to Give Voter Data 
• At Last: A Solution to Ballot Fraud

Frisking Nuns!

 

The insanity marches on.

 

We don’t want to insult a hijab clad Muslim woman by a search, but it’s OK to search a  nun?

 

Yep, makes sense to me!

 

You can't make this stuff up!

 

Airport security (Detroit Metro Concourse A).

 

A Catholic nun being frisked by a   Muslim security agent!

 

Excuse me?

 

Did you say a   MUSLIM   security agent  screening for suspected terrorists?

 

Political   Correctness is out of control.

 

The irony of it all!!!

Guns and Democrats - Not What You Think

In 1865 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States.

 

In 1881 a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United States who later died from the wound.

 

In 1963 a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the United States.

 

In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States.

 

In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the United States.

 

In 1984 James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.

 

In 1986 Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.

 

In 1990 James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office.

 

In 1991 George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a Luby's cafeteria.

 

In 1995 James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.

 

In 1999 Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a church service.

 

In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US.

 

In 2003 Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.

 

In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.

 

In 2009, a left wing radical Islamic sympathizer Major Nidal Hasan fatally shot 13 people and injured more than 30 others on Fort Hood, near Killeen, Texas. The shooting produced more casualties than any other on an American military base.

 

In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in the head thus wounding her for life.

 

In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.

 

In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis.

 

In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a school.

 

In Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a Navy ship yard.

 

In 2016 a registered Muslim Democrat murdered 49 people in an Orlando night club.

 

Only a few weeks ago, in May of 2017, a disgruntled Democrat, shot Rep. Steve Scalise and four others on a baseball field in Virginia.

 

One could go on, but you get the point, even if the media doesn't ever mention these facts while constantly preaching to us about how we need more gun control.

 

Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns.

 

Oh, and by the way...

 

Not one NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservative was involved in these shootings and murders.

A Perfect Illustration of the Difference

Today most of the U.S. population who vote are unaware of just how far to the left the Democratic Party has shifted its focus over the last 50 years; beginning in the '60s with the "cultural revolution" and its social engineering.

To understand why I've titled this post the way I have, I urge you to watch this Prager U video which makes the point rather clear and may surprise some millennials.

Typical Diversion Away From Self Control and Responsibility

The radical leftists, as is their standard way of combating opposition to their ideology, are using the media as their propaganda tool to divert the public's attention away from the real issue. Last Friday Vice Pres. Pence spoke at an anniversary event for the Focus on the Family and the left's outraged response to this was to claim that restrictions on abortion are forcing women to have babies! Excuse me?

So, let me see if I understand this... a couple meets, and they get interested in each other and decide to have sexual relations. (More often, than not, these events occur spontaneously on a "first date" these days.) Did anyone force them to have sex? Did no one ever tell them about having "safe sex"? You know... using a condom would be "safe sex" which statistically results in preventing conception and the formation of a zygote (a multi-celled entity which grows into a fetus and eventually a human being with potential; if it's given a chance to grow to full term). So, if no one forced them to have sex - especially unprotected sex which increases the possibility for STDs - and the female conceived, who's responsible for bringing that child into this world by their actions?

But no... liberals do NOT want to take responsibility for their actions. Instead, in their minds it's the government's responsibility to remove their "gamble" that they wouldn't conceive by allowing them to remove it via the procedure of abortion; killing approximately 900 babies a day. And if anyone tries to tell them otherwise, they're being "forced" to have the baby! No, the liberals are just ignoring what they already know is the facts about the circumstance their "gamble" created for them and they are so spoiled and in denial about it that they do their best to place the "unpleasantness" of it all on those pointing out the consequences to them.

They want all the pleasure, and none of the responsibility or consequences which come with it. In short, they don't want to be the young adults they've become. I call it a version of the "Peter Pan" effect.