Sunday, August 13, 2017

I Dream Women Will One Day...


Does that mean that this brilliant liberal wants...
 
- women to be banned from entering school and college campuses?
- women to be banned from any establishment selling alcohol?
- women to be banned from polling places on election days
- women to be banned from any official government group meetings?
- all women to be banned from all airports?
- you to have to pay a fee to the state before you can have a woman with you?
- some women to be banned outright simply because they look too scary?
- all women to be locked up at all times that they are not in use?
 
Hmmmm.  
 
- Does she also think that all guys should have more than one?
- That all women should come with silencers?
 
Maybe this was not well thought out.  

But, what "progressive" issues are?

Does This Ring A Bell For You?

My Grandfather watched his friends die in WWI…

My father watched his friends die in WWII and Korea…

I watched (first hand) as my friends fought and died in Vietnam...

I watched as our friends and their children fought and died in Desert Storm...

I watched and waited while our friends and their children fought and died in Iraq...

None of them fought for or died for the Mexican Flag or any other foreign flag...

Everyone fought for and died for the United States Flag!

In Texas, a student raised a Mexican Flag on a flag pole in front of his school; another student took it down because it was offensive.

Guess who was expelled... the kid who took the Mexican Flag down!

Students in California were sent home this year on Cinco de Mayo from their high school because they wore T-shirts with the American Flag printed on them.

Enough is enough!

This email message needs to be viewed by every American,

and every American who agrees with it needs to take a stand for America.

We've bent over to appease the America-haters who are benefiting from our great land long enough...

I'm taking a stand!

I'm standing up because the hundreds of thousands who died in wars for this country, and for our country's flag can't stand up; they gave the ultimate sacrifice!

And shame on anyone who makes this message a racist one!

Let me make this perfectly clear...

This is my country! And, my making such a statement does not mean I'm against immigration!

You are welcome here in our country...

To come in through the LEGAL process:

  1. Get a sponsor!
  2. Get a place to lay your head!
  3. Get a job!
  4. Live by OUR rules (laws)!
  5. Pay your taxes! And...
  6. Learn our language – English – like immigrants have in the past!

DO NOT demand that we hand over our lifetime savings of Social Security Funds to you!

When will Americans STOP giving away their rights?

We've gone farther than is reasonable, we've bent over backwards to not offend anyone...

But, it seems no one cares about the impact of American citizens being offended!

WAKE UP AMERICA!!!

Saturday, August 12, 2017

Muslims In America Were Given A Cookie

The following is a comment - a take off of a popular child's book with the title, "If You Give A Mouse A Cookie" was posted by an anonymous individual on Roger Stone's web site about the machinations of Muslims in America points out how they've been given the opportunity to implement their long-term plan to dominate and rule America.

= = = = = = = = = = =

If you give a Muslim a cookie, he’ll complain that it isn’t halal and demand that you provide one that is.

If you give a Muslim a halal cookie, he’ll demand that you give him a job so he can buy his own cookies.

If you give a Muslim a job, he’ll demand you give him time out to pray [five times a day].

If you give a Muslim time out to pray, he’ll demand that you respect his prophet.

If you show respect for his prophet, a Muslim will demand that you stop singing your National Anthem.

If you stop singing your National Anthem, a Muslim will demand that you elect him to Congress.

If you elect a Muslim to Congress, he’ll demand that we change our Constitution, so we are no longer allowed to speak freely or have guns or worship the god of our choice (or not any god at all).

If we change the Constitution to what a Muslim demands, he will demand that Sharia Law be followed by everyone in the land.

If Sharia is followed by everyone in the land, then Muslims will be permitted by law to execute anyone who disagrees with them or does not dress like them or does not worship Allah.

Congress, you gave a Muslim a cookie.

The Truth Is Exonerating Trump


Recently, Dick Morris posted the following information about former F.B.I. Director James Comey, titled "Comey is #1 Rogue Spook":

= = = = = = = = =

Comey started a war on Trump!

It was Comey who brought the phony dossier out into the public and created the Russian illusion/collusion scandal:
•  COMEY insisted on including a two-page summary of the unverified, fabricated and highly inflammatory anti-Trump dossier in a report to the President and leaders of Congress

•  COMEY has testified that he knew that providing confidential information to Congress virtually assured that  it would appear in the press. He said he had learned how that works in Washington

•  Comey was right. BUZZFEED immediately published the entire dossier and millions read the phony claims

•  The FBI knew there were problems with the dossier. In October, 2016,right before the election, the bureau offered $50,000 to Christopher Steele who compiled the dossier. The FBI wanted him to verify the claims in his dossier.

•  Steele never verified the dossier and Comey was informed by James Clapper, head of the National Intelligence Agency that the charges in the dossier could not be verified and that there were problems with some of the "sources."

•  Despite these warnings about the reliability of the dossier, Comey never alerted the public to the phony material in the dossier

•  The fake information in the dossier was easily proven to be false

•  The FBI refused to admit or deny that it paid any money to Steele.

•  Steele has worked with the FBI in the past

•  Steele later told a London Court that much of the material in the dossier was provided to him by "unsolicited sources" and needed to be verified.

After Trump fired Comey, he signed a multi-million dollar book deal.

Maybe he was saving the truth about the dossier for his memoirs.

Directing the FBI turned out to be lucrative.

= = = = = = = = =
Sadly, this seems to be the standard procedure for those seeking fame and fortune in "the swamp".

Friday, August 11, 2017

Propaganda Machine Is Full On


With the Russia/Trump collusion story now proven to produce absolutely nothing, the mainstream media has jumped on the bandwagon to collude and take advantage of the "tin horned potbelly dictator" of North Korea's threats to attack U.S. locations by carefully manipulating the story line to appear supportive of their narrative; that Pres. Trump is mentally unstable and, as they believe fervently, he needs to be removed. 

This effort is essentially an effort to nullify our last presidential election in order to retain the establishment's status quo agenda of moving the nation closer to their goal; a nation encumbered with regulations from the EPA, climate change, and UN sanctions against anything resembling the freedoms and liberties which have been under intense and blatant assault during the last administration.

All of this news by the MSM is merely an effort by the "Deep State" to convince the gullible public that there's extreme concern with possibly being nuked by Kim Jung Un's regime. As Rush Limbaugh has been saying, "North Korea can't hit the side of a barn door, let alone send a missile to Hawaii or the west coast." Until and unless it is confirmed that any of their missile launches produce irrefutable proof that they've been able to even splash the launched missile down in any area reasonably close to a U.S. location, there is no actual need to be concerned with claims touted by the regime.

Having lived through the prior "close calls" with Soviet Russia, I ain't buying this line of garbage the media's pumping out now any more than I did that Trump colluded with Russia to fix the election.

Wasserman Schultz's Weak Defense

The more recent news about Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz's statement of defending her reason for keeping Imran Awan on her payroll longer than any other members of Congress as an IT specialist is very revealing about the mindset of a liberal. 

Imran is one of five Pakistanis who'd engaged in highly suspicious activities in D.C. for years and it is known that they, collectively, that they sent to Pakistan hundreds of thousands of dollars and Imran had access to Capitol Hill's servers which access was cut off by Capitol Police and his laptop was seized.

Whenever liberals are caught engaging in supporting criminal activities - Awan is now charged with bank fraud, among other crimes - they employ the virtue card they've been trained as liberals to use by claiming it was a difficult thing for her to do by keeping his paychecks flowing when she knew he'd been dropped for good reasons by others in congress who'd cut him off months ago. 

It's important to note that they are instructed as public figures to always conduct their interactions with others doing their "dirty work" from a distance of plausible deniability. And, what is interesting to me is the idea that Wasserman Schultz is claiming Awan, a foreigner with a green card, deserved his due process as a reason for keeping him on the payroll. Some have even speculated that there is a more personal connection to this situation than has been publicly revealed up to this point.

Wasserman Schultz, former Chair of the DNC, was fired from the position not long after it was disclosed by published emails from Wikileaks of the DNC's communiques that she had colluded with Hillary Clinton's campaign that Bernie Sanders - Clinton's contender for the Democratic Party's candidacy during the primary election process - would not win the nomination.

Only time will tell whether Wasserman Schultz will be pulled into the vortex of this criminal case of Awan's should his lawyer defending him advises Imran to accept a plea bargain and implicates her in the process. Personally, I doubt it, but, it's possible if the evidence is there to support it.