Friday, August 11, 2017

Wasserman Schultz's Weak Defense

The more recent news about Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz's statement of defending her reason for keeping Imran Awan on her payroll longer than any other members of Congress as an IT specialist is very revealing about the mindset of a liberal. 

Imran is one of five Pakistanis who'd engaged in highly suspicious activities in D.C. for years and it is known that they, collectively, that they sent to Pakistan hundreds of thousands of dollars and Imran had access to Capitol Hill's servers which access was cut off by Capitol Police and his laptop was seized.

Whenever liberals are caught engaging in supporting criminal activities - Awan is now charged with bank fraud, among other crimes - they employ the virtue card they've been trained as liberals to use by claiming it was a difficult thing for her to do by keeping his paychecks flowing when she knew he'd been dropped for good reasons by others in congress who'd cut him off months ago. 

It's important to note that they are instructed as public figures to always conduct their interactions with others doing their "dirty work" from a distance of plausible deniability. And, what is interesting to me is the idea that Wasserman Schultz is claiming Awan, a foreigner with a green card, deserved his due process as a reason for keeping him on the payroll. Some have even speculated that there is a more personal connection to this situation than has been publicly revealed up to this point.

Wasserman Schultz, former Chair of the DNC, was fired from the position not long after it was disclosed by published emails from Wikileaks of the DNC's communiques that she had colluded with Hillary Clinton's campaign that Bernie Sanders - Clinton's contender for the Democratic Party's candidacy during the primary election process - would not win the nomination.

Only time will tell whether Wasserman Schultz will be pulled into the vortex of this criminal case of Awan's should his lawyer defending him advises Imran to accept a plea bargain and implicates her in the process. Personally, I doubt it, but, it's possible if the evidence is there to support it.

No comments:

Post a Comment