He Fights For America!

This article nails it! If only I could be as articulate with making my points about what going on today as well as this man does!

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

He Fights by Evan Sayet

My Leftist friends (as well as many ardent #NeverTrumpers) constantly ask me if I’m not bothered by Donald Trump’s lack of decorum.. They ask, if I don’t think his tweets are “beneath the dignity of the office."

Here’s my answer: We Right-thinking people have tried dignity. There could not have been a man of more quiet dignity than George W. Bush as he suffered the outrageous lies and politically motivated hatreds that undermined his presidency. We tried statesmanship. Could there be another human being on this earth who so desperately prized “collegiality” as John McCain? We tried propriety – has there been a nicer human being ever than Mitt Romney? And the results were always the same. This is because, while we were playing by the rules of dignity, collegiality and propriety, the Left has been, for the past 60 years, engaged in a knife fight where the only rules are those of Saul Alinsky and the Chicago mob.

I don’t find anything “dignified,” “collegial” or“proper” about Barack Obama’s lying about what went down on the streets of Ferguson in order to ramp up racial hatreds because racial hatreds serve the Democratic Party. I don’t see anything “dignified” in lying about the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi and imprisoning an innocent filmmaker to cover your tracks. I don’t see anything “statesman-like” in weaponizing the IRS to be used to destroy your political opponents and any dissent. Yes, Obama was “articulate” and “polished” but in no way was he in the least bit “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper.” 

The Left has been engaged in a war against America since the rise of the Children of the ‘60s. To them, it has been an all-out war where nothing is held sacred and nothing is seen as beyond the pale. It has been a war they’ve fought with violence, the threat of violence, demagoguery and lies from day one – the violent take-over of the universities – till today. The problem is that, through these years, the Left has been the only side fighting this war. While the Left has been taking a knife to anyone who stands in their way, the Right has continued to act with dignity, collegiality and propriety. With Donald Trump, this all has come to an end. Donald Trump is America's first wartime president in the Culture War.. 

During wartime, things like “dignity” and “collegiality” simply aren’t the most essential qualities one looks for in their warriors. Ulysses Grant was a drunk whose behavior in peacetime might well have seen him drummed out of the Army for conduct unbecoming. Had Abraham Lincoln applied the peacetime rules of propriety and booted Grant, the Democrats might well still be holding their slaves today. Lincoln rightly recognized that, “I cannot spare this man. He fights.”

General George Patton was a vulgar-talking, son-of-a-bitch. In peacetime, this might have seen him stripped of rank. But, had Franklin Roosevelt applied the normal rules of decorum then, Hitler and the Socialists would be five decades into their thousand-year Reich. Trump is fighting. And what’s particularly delicious is that, like Patton standing over the battlefield as his tanks obliterated Rommel’s, he’s shouting, “You magnificent bastards, I read your book!” That is just the icing on the cake, but it’s wonderful to see that not only is Trump fighting, he’s defeating the Left using their own tactics. That book is Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals – a book so essential to the Liberals’ war against America that it is and was the playbook for the entire Obama administration and the subject of Hillary Clinton’s senior thesis. It is a book of such pure evil, that, just as the rest of us would dedicate our book to those we most love or those to whom we are most indebted, Alinsky dedicated his book to Lucifer. 

Trump’s tweets may seem rash and unconsidered but, in reality, he is doing exactly what Alinsky suggested his followers do.. First, instead of going after “the fake media” — and they are so fake that they have literally gotten every single significant story of the past 60 years not just wrong, but diametrically opposed to the truth, from the Tet Offensive to Benghazi, to what really happened on the streets of Ferguson, Missouri — Trump isolated CNN. He made it personal. 

Then, just as Alinsky suggests, he employs ridicule which Alinsky described as “the most powerful weapon of all.” ... Most importantly, Trump’s tweets have put CNN in an untenable and unwinnable position. They need to respond. This leaves them with only two choices. They can either “go high” (as Hillary would disingenuously declare of herself and the fake news would disingenuously report as the truth) and begin to honestly and accurately report the news, or they can double-down on their usual tactics and hope to defeat Trump with twice their usual hysteria and demagoguery. The problem for CNN (et al.) with the former is that, if they were to start honestly reporting the news, that would be the end of the Democratic Party they serve. 

It is nothing but the incessant use of fake news (read: propaganda) that keeps the Left alive. Imagine, for example, if CNN had honestly and accurately reported then-candidate Barack Obama’s close ties to foreign terrorists (Rashid Khalidi), domestic terrorists (William Ayers), the mafia (Tony Rezko) or the true evils of his spiritual mentor, Jeremiah Wright’s church. Imagine if they had honestly and accurately conveyed the evils of the Obama administration’s weaponizing of the IRS to be used against their political opponents or his running of guns to the Mexican cartels or the truth about the murder of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the Obama administration’s cover-up. 

So, to my friends on the Left — and the #NeverTrumpers as well — do I wish we lived in a time when our president could be “collegial” and “dignified” and “proper”? Of course I do. These aren’t those times. This is war. And it’s a war that the Left has been fighting without opposition for the past 50 years. So, say anything you want about this president - I get it - he can be vulgar, he can be crude, he can be undignified at times. I don’t care.. I can’t spare this man. He fights for America!

Evan Douglas Sayet is a comedian and conservative speaker.  He is the nations leading conservative speaker, an in-demand Master of Ceremony for Republican events.  Sayet is the author of The KinderGarden Of Eden:  How The Modern Liberal Thinks And Why He's Convinced That ignorance Is Bliss.

Using Hard Evidence & Logical Reasoning

In our modern day mass media overload, the narrative from the majority of news and commentary sources is using a misleading premise regarding the social injustices of blacks today. This is how the liberal/socialists of the left wing leverage their ability to convince the public that they have a valid cause. A couple of the more recent issues of the BLM narrative, and "kneeling during the national anthem" at sporting events are two cases in point.

In an earlier interview of Thomas Sowell - a member of the Hoover Institute at Stanford University - challenges this false premise with hard evidence proving that this is an intentional misleading of the public. I provide the link to this interview here for the sake of allowing others to understand what Mr. Sowell is pointing out.

In another interview with a former member of the Black Panthers of the '60s - Clarence Mason Weaver - points out the fallacies of the BLM's premise that the black community must have whites care about them and their plight more.

If, on an intellectual level, we are willing to examine the facts, and not the emotional ploy of today's liberal press, then we can better understand how our modern issues which are constantly bombarding the consumer, are subtly persuading them with false reasons one should support such causes of these SJWs (Social-Justice Warriors).

Footnote: If you're willing to examine this interview of two BLM supporters it will become obvious how they are using talking points which they are only repeating and are void of any ability or skill to think critically about what the interviewer - Jamie Lee Peterson - is asking them to think about. (His process is called the Socratic method.) This is a prime example of just how steeped in their narrow world of social injustice these two interviewees are because today's education system is dominated by those who promote this meme onto their students. (I would know from 30 years of working amongst their ranks.) And, if you're intellectually honest with yourself, you'll recognize the obsession of "power" to the point of acquiring it so they can impose dominance over the white community. Also, if you're paying attention to the interviewees carefully, you'll notice how they react when confronted with questions of logic from the interviewer. And when the interviewer points out that they're angry, it quickly generates a response which spouts their indoctrination talking points, which is all they know or understand. Finally, once the interviewer confronts the interviewees with the key question, "What do you want from white people?" notice how they react. It's VERY telling!

Special Post For Significant Comment

Over the years of reading various articles I've noticed an occasional comment at the bottom that is so well stated, or witty, that I consider them a significant comment. Since these significant comments have been noticed repeatedly, it occurred to me that it would make a worthy contribution to this blog to insert a few as a post once in a while for my readers. I hope they're ones that are enjoyable to them as much as they have been to me. I enjoy these because it is interesting to see how others manage to express similar sentiments in such diverse ways.

So, I've decided to start today posting a significant comment and in the future will title each new additional significant comment with the same title; Special Post For Significant Comment.

"i listened to hillary shrill for a minute yesterday. she said all the same things she has been saying for 3 decades, women this, women that. and the left continues to ignore the real problem….young men, mostly black, definitely democratic leaning, that are being led to slaughter by the democrat party. no wonder they riot."

And... regarding the state of California recently passing a law to make it a "sanctuary state" for illegals:

"Please try not to be too hard on California and remember their start as a State. The old rhyme sums it up best: ”The miners came in 49; the whores in 51 and when they got together they made the native son.” So essentially they started off as bastards and remain so to this day."

DACA Advocates Just Don't Get It!

What this nation is witnessing now is a full-on invasion! I believe it's because we citizens in America are too polite overall and have no concept of just how much the allowance of their staying in the country is costing them personally in a multitude of ways; sucking our social security funds, killing U.S. citizens in accidents, and committing crimes which strains our law enforcement forces who are already under attack.

Dreamers are showing their full colors of just how little regard they have for adherence to laws in the very country they were brought into by their parents who snuck into the United States illegally years ago. Their disregard for honoring any U.S. laws is obviously premised on the notion that human rights are superior to any laws a country may have. 

Yet, in the very country they originate from, the authorities there wouldn't even give them the time of day to argue this point, but just throw them in prison without any hearing and let them rot there. Might this reality have been the motivation of the parents of these DACA "Dreamer's" to flea their own country and enter the U.S. illegally?

To get a clearer understanding of this attitude which attempts to obfuscate and confuse the public who aren't able to think for themselves, I invite the reader to watch this video carefully by giving it your complete attention and focus on how Cesar Vargas repeatedly replies to every question put to him.

United Nations Delegates Stunned Into Silence

Apparently, as recently as September, an event at the U.N. occurred which caused the listeners to a guest speaker silenced by the surprise of who was saying to them about Hamas's impact on Palestinians; none other than the "Son of Hamas" Mosab Hassan Yousef! Watch the video of his speech to the large delegation of U.N. Ambassadors and the expressions of shock and silence as he reveals the truth about why Palestinians are living in misery and who is really to blame for it.

We can only hope and pray that this becomes a trend at the U.N. to bring out the truth about the countless atrocities and corruption which have occurred under its "organization".

A North Korean Human Rights Story

I received this very stirring message with the following video attached today. I do not know anything about this particular organization where this girl is speaking to her audience, but it reveals some rare insight into what the life of a North Korean is like under this dark regime of the Kim family.

I urge you to share this with others!

Question Everything!

It's been two days since we woke up to learn from the media that there was a horrendous massacre in Las Vegas. Within an hour or two we were told that it was Stephen Paddock, and accountant at Lockheed who had a pension, or obsession for gambling and had apparently no apparent motive for holding up in the 32nd floor suite room of the Mandalay Bay hotel for days to prepare for the shooting of hundreds of people attending the country western music concert only a couple blocks away.

Yes, some of the video footage makes it obvious that there was someone shooting an automatic - rapid fire capable - weapon from that high vantage point in order to spray fire down on the crowd below, but does that prove that it was Stephen Paddock doing the firing? Yes, the S.W.A.T. team which breached the room found Paddock dead from an apparent "self-inflicted gun shot wound", but that still doesn't prove that he was firing the weapon.

I'm not trying to defend Paddock, or anyone else for carrying out this heinous act, but what I'm trying to get at here is that all the facts have not yet been gathered about this extremely complex and mysterious event. And, for various reasons, I can't help but feel that we may not ever know the actual facts surrounding this largest mass shooting event in our nation's history. Call me a "conspiracy nut", but my gut tells me that several factors and elements involved in this whole event just don't wash. To help clarify my point, I'm going to list some key questions about it:

1. Why is there STILL no apparent or obvious motive?
2. How is it that this person had no criminal background, or record, that gives any clue about a motive?
3. While his brother in Florida has stated that he wasn't the kind of guy to do something like this, does it seem plausible that, as someone has suggested, that the rise in prescription drugs could be a factor in this case?
4. Why would he possibly need to have 23 different weapons, not to mention the accompanying ammunition necessary for those pieces, in the suite if he was alone?
5. Could he possibly fire even half of those weapons that were found in the suite by the S.W.A.T. team?
6. Why didn't hotel security notice something was "off" in their monitoring of security cameras when seeing him come through the lobby with multiple luggage pieces time after time; much more than a usual hotel patron?
7. Why did it happen that his female friend was out of the country at the time this event went down?
8. Why did he apparently wire $100,000 to the Philippines shortly before the event?
9. Why do we see images of the Mandalay Bay hotel from the outside showing two exterior windows, several yards apart, broken out?
10. Why is ISIS taking credit for this attack?
11. Why is the F.B.I. stating that there is "currently no evidence that Paddock joined ISIS"?
12. Why were there reportedly two video cameras found on that floor; one down the hall from the suite, linked to a monitor in the suite from which the shooting occurred, and another within the suite?
13. Why is there now an audio recording of the S.W.A.T. team released and played on Michael Savage's radio show disclosing that the team confirmed that there was a second shooter in the suite?
14. Is it too far fetched to conjecture that, if ISIS has claimed Paddock was a soldier of theirs, they set him up for this?
15. Is it plausible, given these unanswered questions, that the following might also be a possibility?
1. Paddock was having financial problems from his compulsive gambling.
2. Some other person, or group, or organization posed Paddock as the "patsy" by holding him hostage in the suite, carrying out the massacre of firing on the concert goers, then shooting Paddock and leaving him as the decoy and escaping by some means unknown.
3. The purpose for doing this might possibly be to further stir up division between conservatives and liberals in the country by making it appear as though a white male just decided to kill a bunch of people; reviving the decades long debate over "gun control" even before all the bodies have been taken off the concert grounds given some of the statements already made by some liberals in reaction.

Why do I get a feeling in my gut about this event that too many things just don't add up and that we're, from the media and law enforcement officials on the case, not being told all of what actually happened? Is the truth too revealing that it would most likely unite the country sufficiently when it was learned, to bring about the end of their control? If we do learn of something that makes all of these unanswered questions invalid or moot, then great. I've been barking up the wrong tree, as the saying goes.

But, given the quantity of fake news which we've learned about in just the last year, I can't help but wonder if that as well might be just another made up story for public consumption. 

Update - 10/03/17: New information from the Las Vegas Sheriff's press conference today revealed some information that does change some of my points. However... he also did make a point of supporting my point that it is their suspicion that there most likely was an accomplice to this horrible act and that he intended to escape after he was done killing. It appears that this story is going to play out for many months to come and we may not ever know what motive he may have had for carrying this out.

Update - 10/04/17: New questions are mounting from those who have the skill to think critically about things that don't make sense. While some of them seem bogus to me, there are other questions which reveal some very good points I hadn't even considered. Link #1 / Link #2 / Link #3 / Link #4

Update - 10/5/17: Ann Coulter's posted a new article on this issue. And then, there are those who's countering views use the Occum's Razor premise; that the simplest explanation is most likely correct.