As an observer of our nation's general deterioration as I've grown up and more recently during the previous administration's eight year reign, I have developed a clearer theory about how, and why, it is all going down. It expanded with more intense infiltration of operatives from Soviet Russia and the latest operative got into the White House to implement national policies to further degrade our nation's strength in various ways. After all, it has been documented that the long term goal of Communism is to overthrow our nation; however long it takes.
In the past I've stated that in the post WWII era of the '50s when I came into the world, it was the Soviets of Communist Russia who had developed a long-term plan under Nikita Kruschev's leadership. It began with Kruschev banging his shoe on the table in front of him at the U.N. during J.F.K.'s term and shouting in Russian, "We will bury you!"
The cultural revolution of the '60s was orchestrated by a combination of Soviet spies who had effectively infiltrated our government, "useful idiots" of youth who were spoiled by their parent's affluence and wanted to rebel, and the drug cartels who peddled death on the streets of our cities via the desperate children of the ghettos of our larger urban centers. Religion and social values were attacked using various psychological strategies which preyed on the human desire to "be cool" and fit in with those who were considered "on the cutting edge of social change". Our more base obsessions with riches and pleasure in a capitalistic culture dominated our experience as the "British Invasion" of rock & roll swept across the nation, got its youth high on drugs, and molded our youth's attitudes about authority and war. It was a very messy time of change as our nation's innocence was ravaged. Then too, over time the country would learn of the sexual abuses of the past by the priests in the Catholic Church; further demoralizing its citizens and causing religion and morality to lose its place.
With the election of a conservative president in the '80s, the liberal left implemented a strategy of opposition to their long range plan to dominate the public's attitude of wanting something for nothing via the welfare largess of the government and characterizing the sitting president as a "bafoon" who didn't really know what he was talking about. This period was a time of learning from their efforts to be more effective and they used it to defend their next leader, Bill Clinton, from being ousted from office.
Fast forwarding through the Bush I & II administrations where some degree of push back began to reveal itself, the culture of "the Swamp" in D.C. began to coalesce into a self-serving and corporatism dominating the culture within the beltway. At the same time, the mainstream media was filled from the college/university ranks by journalists who predominantly leaned socialist/left.
During this period, way off in the middle of the Pacific Ocean on an island a young black man grew up under the influence of an individual who the F.B.I. considered worth monitoring; one Frank Marshall Davis, who was a registered member of the Communist Party U.S.A. Then, as he moved into the mainland as a college student, he honed the socialist skills of his main mentor; one Saul Alinsky.
Alinsky's focus for his long term goal of undermining the capitalism he abhorred grew out of his training under Al Capone's "right-hand man" in Chicago. As an educated individual on sociology, Alinsky developed a set of "rules for radicals" which was the title of his now more well known book. Fresh out of college at Harvard, Barrack Obama became a community organizer in south Chicago and learned how to implement those rules effectively to rally those less educated members of the community to work against those in power who ignored them. This resulted in a more solid voter base for the Democratic Party in the highly populated urban center.
Eventually his connections and accomplishments got the attention of local political leaders and he began to rise in the ranks of the state legislature during the Bush II years. Then, seemingly out of nowhere, as a state Senator in Congress, he burst onto the national scene with the media practically drooling over his every word. After winning the presidency by brushing Hillary Clinton aside in the primary, and all through his two terms in office, Obama implemented as many liberal/leftist policies he could; clearly going outside the parameters spelled out in the U.S. Constitution.
These policies have created the greatest divisiveness with the country for decades since the Civil Rights era of the late '50s and through the '60s. Stepping into local matters where no president had meddled in before, he stirred up national resentment by occasionally exposing his true sentiments by saying things - like, "...the police acted stupidly..." which started the ball rolling on destroying the "color blindness" that the nation had worked at developing over the past several decades. Now, we have a highly paid - via George Soros - and organized group known as Black Lives Matter which has become popular and idolized as social warriors of social justice among the millennials of today.
This has created a dominating climate of political correctness which has pitted whites against blacks, Christians against Muslims, and rich against poor. People who have benefited from their past social prominence in various ways are now beginning to encounter the wrath of a level of society that has been empowered by socialist thinking; thanks to a president who's mother attended "the little Red schoolhouse" on Mercer Island back in the '60s. If someone is unable to contain their frustration, it becomes a national incident on social media and their employer fires them to protect their public image. Simultaneously, the developments in the middle-eastern countries during Obama's presidency has seen the rise of Islamic Jihad and the immigration of millions who have no intention of assimilating into our nation's society. No, it's rather obvious that they intend to overtake it. Snowflakes, the LGBTQ community (which is actually only 0.3% of the nation's population) and social justice warriors are now dominating the news and running the agenda, thanks to Obama's policies.
Anyone who's been paying attention over the past decade has become aware of the multiple situations which have occurred and how it has intensified since Obama took office. I believe the nation's voters were extremely relieved to hear Trump's message on the campaign trail and had become well aware of the corruption and reputation of his opponent despite the mainstream media's attempt to ignore or hype the concept of electing the first female president. They'd grown tired of those inside the beltway serving their own interests and not those who'd elected them.
Now, those very Republicans who have become comfortable in their ensconced positions of power and influence in "the Swamp" and who pleaded with the voters across the country to just give them total control in Congress so they could fix things, can't even pass a desperation bill to begin discussion of repealing the one thing Obama was able to get implemented that is negatively impacting the whole country; healthcare!
Many are now speculating that this will not bode well for the mid-term elections next year in 2018 and potentially give liberal/leftist/stateists - think Maxine Waters, Charles Schumer, or Nancy Pelosi - another shot at taking back control in Congress to obstruct and make Pres. Trump's agenda even less effective than it already has with their fake news about Russian collusion during the last campaign. Their obsession with Watergate, Part 2, is fantasizing that they'll impeach him from office. If there is any "legacy" for which Obama will be known in the history books of tomorrow, it is this current state of affairs in our cripple political system. It seems to me that it's safe to say... Mission accomplished for the Communists.
Whether the "fly-over country" citizens of the country remain resolved to combat this takeover, or not, will determine its future as a free society, or slaves of the state.
No comments:
Post a Comment