As the saying used to go among adults when I was growing up, "There's something rotten going on in Denmark!"
Only today, that saying would more appropriately be, "There's something rotten going on in the United Nations!" Why? Well, let me ask a few pointed questions.
If you had the inclination to take over a country by stealth methods, how would you successfully manage to pull that off?
If you were involved in helping others to improve their lives because they were fleeing foreign countries where war, famine, drought, and religious persecution was rampant, you'd feel good as a person, right?
What would you say would be a reasonable number of immigrants - excluding those sneaking into the country through the southern border every year for the past several decades - that should be allowed to come into the country? 50,000, 100,000, 250,000, or more? Surely, if our governments been letting them in at the rate they have already, it must be because they know best how many our economic situation can handle, right?
What would be your reaction be if you discovered that most of these refugees who arrived in the country were not vetted, checked for communicable diseases, were being given U.S. Passports, and were being instructed on how to sign up for receiving Social Security Disability Insurance benefits when they've never paid a nickle into the system? How long would it take you to realize, "Hey, wait, I've been paying into this all my working life and I'm going to be subsidizing these foreigners?"
Has it ever occurred to you that, based on other incidences in the past from news reports and other sources that you realized you weren't being told the whole truth about something? Or, are you someone who, when they hear the news on something you don't quite understand much about, just accepts at face value that, because the news media is authoritative, you trust their reporting of what is told the public to be accurate, the whole truth, and is all on the up-and-up?
I urge you to watch this interview of a woman from the mid-west who attended several refugee organization meetings learned what was actually going on behind the scenes and about which many aspect of the process are kept quiet from the public, about who, what and why they are coming into the country in such numbers. It's worse than you might expect.
Saturday, January 20, 2018
Monday, January 15, 2018
Democrats' Successful Deception
The paragraph below Prager U's latest video about the social attitude about Republicans says:
When you think of the Republican Party, what comes to mind? If you’re like many Americans, you may associate the GOP with racism, sexism, and general inequality. It’s a commonly pushed narrative by left-leaning media and academia, but as former Vanderbilt Professor of Political Science Carol Swain explains, the Republican Party was actually responsible for nearly every advancement for minorities and women in U.S. history—and remains the champion of equality to this day.It's my personal conclusion from research that the Democratic Party, during the Johnson administration of the mid-sixties, devised a strategy that successfully dealt with the unpleasant truths of their past by implementing a switching of narrative, in collusion with the media, about Republicans as the culprits of sexism and slavery, while using the Civil Rights act of 1964 to convince the African-American community that the federal government was their best friend.
As Rush Limbaugh has said this morning on his radio broadcast repeatedly, "They [liberals of today] believe this stuff!", which illustrates just how effective the leftist/statists have been in pushing their psy-ops campaign on the public for the past 50 years!
With Pres. Trump in the Oval Office liberals are now in full panic mode about everything he says or does because they've not had an outsider of the D.C. swamp dish back at them what they've used to control past presidents with. I urge you to share this, and other Prager U videos with your friends online.
Sunday, January 14, 2018
2016 Election Reaction Flashback
It's
been just over 14 months since the nation elected Donald Trump
president. Yet, even today, the left has not gotten over their initial
shock and dismay that Hillary lost. The media continues to malign and
berate him while obsessing over every little petty thing they can find
to put him in a negative light in the eyes of those who would rather
have had a continuation of the past eight years' policies under Hillary!
Just
for the sake of perspective, as well as a refresher - and for those of
you who may not have ever seen this before - here is a montage of video clips from
the days and weeks of post election reaction by the left's Hillary
Clinton sycophants. I include it here because it reveals insight into
just how immature they truly are and how their remarks at many points
reveals the perspective they have about their perception of the conservative's agenda.
It
is my personal conviction that the reason we're witnessing the degree
of absurdity from the leftist in Congress is because they are truly out
of ammunition to counter the successes which Pres. Trump has had over
the past year, plus, in office. "Impeach 45" from crazy Maxine Waters,
"people are going to die" from Elizabeth Warren, ad nausea. Resorting to
the playbook, they continue to jump on every circumstance - the latest
being the comparison of two disparate countries by the President in a
"not so appropriate way" - with race cards flurrying, innuendo of Nazism
or "Hitler".
For further insight into why I make this point, I urge my readers watch this video clip of Sara Sanders with her dad, Gov. Mike Huckabee, on The View discussing these very points and issues. Joy Bahar and Whoopie Goldberg don't even recognize their absurd claims, but Sarah does a great job of countering them. The intensity in the debate ratchets up about the nine minute mark.
We
NEVER hear from the media the positive news and results of Pres.
Trump's flurry of work which will, in my opinion, be impossible to
refute when the nation begins to get their larger paychecks next month.
Yes, I believe come the fall's mid-term election, the Democrats will
suffer an increase in their long slide into oblivion. Assuming I'm
correct, as many others are concluding, Trump will have made a
significant, if not "yuuuuuge" drainage of the D.C. Swamp. Now, if he'll
just steadily replace many of the bureaucrats within the plethora of
agencies which still infest it, I project we will see a shift to
economic and cultural prosperity like this nation's not seen in over 50
years.
Hasta la vista, baby!
Saturday, January 13, 2018
Why the Media's Got It All Wrong
Amidst the wailing and gnashing of teeth by the media in reaction to the president using a comparison between Norway and Haiti to ask a question as to the left's motive for immigration, the N.Y. Times article, by Thomas Kaplan and Sheryl Gay Stolberg covering the most recent activity, posed the situation in a unique way on Wednesday, Jan. 10th. True to the history of this "big dog" newspaper, it's apparent from the way these two reporter's refer to what's going on. They have no clue as to the actual process they describe is going on. Here, let me illustrate what I mean with the following satirical image:
So tell me... do you think Pres. Trump was referring to this person in the picture, or what she is living amidst? Honestly!
With the looming deadline to fund the federal government only a week away on Friday, Jan. 19th, the pressure is mounting for congressional leaders on both sides of the isle to present to the president a bill he says he will sign, but only if it meets specific criteria he has laid out. Of course, the media is emphasizing a bipartisan deal. One, no doubt, it hopes will favor retaining much, if not all, of the existing laws on immigration, as was demonstrated when the first proposal was presented earlier in the week and rejected by Pres. Trump.
For those of us who have been paying attention to the background regarding the make-up of the congressional circumstance, we know there are three factions; Democrats who will do and say anything to destroy any attempts to make good on Trump's campaign promises, Never-Trumpers who will do and say almost anything to accomplish the same, and the minority of conservatives who support Trump's agenda. Thus, greatly outnumbered, Trump is working his negotiation skills using what many have often referred to as "3-D chess".
This article focuses on Rep. Labrador's (R - Idaho) bill which he claims, "... is the only bill that’s going to unify the conference, and it’s going to get us to a majority of the conference". On the other hand, Goodlatte of Virginia in partnership with McCaul of Texas, have presented a broader proposal. The most interesting paragraph in the whole article states:
His campaign promises struck a chord with the middle-class, "fly-over" country, and those who, for the last 8 years, felt totally ignored during the Obama administration. With his clear and unwavering promise to fix the massive holes in the immigration issue, the people voted across the country to put him into office. They wanted their country back!
It is this reality which the N.Y. Times journalists fail, and are unwilling, to admit. It is not Trump who is holding the line on immigration fixes; he's representing the country's majority who put him in the oval office; to represent their interests. Yet, the reporter's verbiage attempts to make it out as though Pres. Trump alone is the problem for the left in the country. Only when it's their president in office, do they claim any reference to the vote of the majority.
The press always does it's best to move the focus away from the beauty of a representative republic where the power resides in "We the People" who've spoken loud and clear.
P.S. When it comes to the looming "government shutdown", should a budget not be in place by the deadline... what most of the people don't know - because the press is unwilling to admit - as well, is that only about 16% of the federal government is actually shut down - the lower priority agencies like national parks - when a budget has not been voted on and passed by Congress. That leaves 84% still funded! So, should we enter into another - and there have been many shut downs in our nation's past - don't believe the press when it goes into "crisis" mode in working the public falsely into a frenzy that the world is going to come crashing down.
So tell me... do you think Pres. Trump was referring to this person in the picture, or what she is living amidst? Honestly!
With the looming deadline to fund the federal government only a week away on Friday, Jan. 19th, the pressure is mounting for congressional leaders on both sides of the isle to present to the president a bill he says he will sign, but only if it meets specific criteria he has laid out. Of course, the media is emphasizing a bipartisan deal. One, no doubt, it hopes will favor retaining much, if not all, of the existing laws on immigration, as was demonstrated when the first proposal was presented earlier in the week and rejected by Pres. Trump.
For those of us who have been paying attention to the background regarding the make-up of the congressional circumstance, we know there are three factions; Democrats who will do and say anything to destroy any attempts to make good on Trump's campaign promises, Never-Trumpers who will do and say almost anything to accomplish the same, and the minority of conservatives who support Trump's agenda. Thus, greatly outnumbered, Trump is working his negotiation skills using what many have often referred to as "3-D chess".
This article focuses on Rep. Labrador's (R - Idaho) bill which he claims, "... is the only bill that’s going to unify the conference, and it’s going to get us to a majority of the conference". On the other hand, Goodlatte of Virginia in partnership with McCaul of Texas, have presented a broader proposal. The most interesting paragraph in the whole article states:
The new House Republicans’ stand underscored the uncertainty about immigration. Mr. Trump’s positions vacillate daily. And members of both parties are divided. Some Democrats are pressing for confrontation, while others seem to fear a political backlash. Some Republicans are searching for compromise against a conservative tide of anti-immigrant fervor.However, the article engages in focusing on Trump as the adversary, or antagonist, in this situation by using his name when explaining what's holding up progress. If Pres. Trump is "vacillating" at all, it's because he is the master at negotiations and understands how to maneuver through the situation. This is where these reporters, from a well known liberally biased newspaper, reveal what most liberals are unwilling to admit when it comes to why Trump won the election in the first place.
His campaign promises struck a chord with the middle-class, "fly-over" country, and those who, for the last 8 years, felt totally ignored during the Obama administration. With his clear and unwavering promise to fix the massive holes in the immigration issue, the people voted across the country to put him into office. They wanted their country back!
It is this reality which the N.Y. Times journalists fail, and are unwilling, to admit. It is not Trump who is holding the line on immigration fixes; he's representing the country's majority who put him in the oval office; to represent their interests. Yet, the reporter's verbiage attempts to make it out as though Pres. Trump alone is the problem for the left in the country. Only when it's their president in office, do they claim any reference to the vote of the majority.
The press always does it's best to move the focus away from the beauty of a representative republic where the power resides in "We the People" who've spoken loud and clear.
P.S. When it comes to the looming "government shutdown", should a budget not be in place by the deadline... what most of the people don't know - because the press is unwilling to admit - as well, is that only about 16% of the federal government is actually shut down - the lower priority agencies like national parks - when a budget has not been voted on and passed by Congress. That leaves 84% still funded! So, should we enter into another - and there have been many shut downs in our nation's past - don't believe the press when it goes into "crisis" mode in working the public falsely into a frenzy that the world is going to come crashing down.
Friday, January 12, 2018
The 4th Amendment Crisis
The latest media outrage over a remark from the president and how they "couch" the remark's intent, or meaning, causes me to understand more clearly why most conservatives in our country have abandon, in droves, being subjected to the meme they are obviously pushing. To me, this kind of manipulation of events in their favor - to convince those who have little to no critical thinking skills, or interest in viewing an event objectively - is what our "new world order" is today; both across the U.S. and in many countries around the globe.
In two words; political correctness.
The left has, since the '90s and the Clinton administration, very carefully and in progressively incremental steps, ratcheted up their rhetoric while shifting from from being civil and accepting of commonly understood points, to not accepting facts for what they are regarding any issue or topic which does not align with their goal. They are very adeptly targeting the youth of our nation who have insufficient life experience and more easily accept without question concepts and ideology which build on that inexperience.
After all, hasn't it been obvious that respect for elders has diminished over the last several decades? I saw it coming while raising my daughters when the cartoon series with Bart Simpson became popular, along with other sitcoms that had teens in a family setting chastising their parents and talking to them as though they were more wise than their parents who just didn't understand. This modeling to the youth of our households promoted the kind of attitudes many millennials have at corporations like Google, Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, and other social medias where it's become common place for left minded youth to have no compunction to call those who disagree with them racists, bigots, xenophobes, sexist or misogynists. Rather than discuss issues in a civil manner, using reason, just label one's opponent with words which attack their personal worth as individuals.
As I've said in previous posts, socialist/communists have long been implementing a long-range plan to undermine - through use of our own judicial and constitutional rights - by using these tools against us in order to gradually shift our norms and reduce our resistance to them. Sadly, they've been pretty effective as witnessed with the gender, immigration, and welfare issues.
Now, I believe, we are about to go through a situation in national politics which will shake our country to the core and prove to be ten times more disconcerting than the Watergate hearings we went through in our younger years. In my view, a president having to resign over 18 minutes of missing tape recording in the Watergate scandal is on a Kindergarten level compared to a president and former secretary of state working together to use unverified information through the F.B.I. to get a FISA warrant to spy on a presidential candidate and president-elect campaign staff.
We're talking major felonious crimes and disregard for constitutional rights here! Forget the misdemeanors.
In two words; political correctness.
The left has, since the '90s and the Clinton administration, very carefully and in progressively incremental steps, ratcheted up their rhetoric while shifting from from being civil and accepting of commonly understood points, to not accepting facts for what they are regarding any issue or topic which does not align with their goal. They are very adeptly targeting the youth of our nation who have insufficient life experience and more easily accept without question concepts and ideology which build on that inexperience.
After all, hasn't it been obvious that respect for elders has diminished over the last several decades? I saw it coming while raising my daughters when the cartoon series with Bart Simpson became popular, along with other sitcoms that had teens in a family setting chastising their parents and talking to them as though they were more wise than their parents who just didn't understand. This modeling to the youth of our households promoted the kind of attitudes many millennials have at corporations like Google, Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, and other social medias where it's become common place for left minded youth to have no compunction to call those who disagree with them racists, bigots, xenophobes, sexist or misogynists. Rather than discuss issues in a civil manner, using reason, just label one's opponent with words which attack their personal worth as individuals.
As I've said in previous posts, socialist/communists have long been implementing a long-range plan to undermine - through use of our own judicial and constitutional rights - by using these tools against us in order to gradually shift our norms and reduce our resistance to them. Sadly, they've been pretty effective as witnessed with the gender, immigration, and welfare issues.
Now, I believe, we are about to go through a situation in national politics which will shake our country to the core and prove to be ten times more disconcerting than the Watergate hearings we went through in our younger years. In my view, a president having to resign over 18 minutes of missing tape recording in the Watergate scandal is on a Kindergarten level compared to a president and former secretary of state working together to use unverified information through the F.B.I. to get a FISA warrant to spy on a presidential candidate and president-elect campaign staff.
We're talking major felonious crimes and disregard for constitutional rights here! Forget the misdemeanors.
Thursday, January 11, 2018
Obama/Clinton Collude To Weaponize DOJ in 2016 Election
Investigations are now revealing evidence that Hillary Clinton and then Pres. Obama - as partners in crime - used a variety of sources and agencies within the D.O.J. respectively to attempt to both create the Trump Dossie and manipulate the general presidential election for Clinton during the campaign.
The following is a transcript from Sean Hannity's evening show on FOX News for today, January 11th, which I've recorded and transcribed myself. (As soon as I get the video of this portion of his openning monolog for this show, I will post it for those who would rather view it, than read it.)
But breaking right now, Sara Carter, investigative reporter, is now telling us that the top investigator, the guy we've been telling you about, Andrew Weissman, he met with journalist from the AP last April to discuss the news outlets' investigation into Paul Manifort. Now, the next day, the AP published a major expose' about Paul Manifort and alleged money laundering. And sources are telling Sarah Carter that the AP reporters in that meeting, they were actually promising to share documents and other information about Manifort with the Dept. of Justice. There's going to be a lot of news in the coming weeks about the media and all of the role they're playing in all of this. Now the AP tonight is denying this,saying it's categorically untrue.
Now, at the time of this conversation Weissman was the head of the department's fraud division and would, a short time later, would join Muller's team, the following month. And according to the report, Weissman notified his superiors about the sit-down with the AP reporters, and during that time he wasn't working for the Manifort case and he didn't have any documents related to it. This shows Weissman had prejudice going into the investigation against Paul Manifort.
Now, that's on top of his troubling history of Weissman, he led the controversial obstruction of justice case, remember, Arthur Anderson and the Enron scandal? Remember, he destroyed that company, tens of thousands of people lost their job, that verdict was later overturned in a Supreme Court unanimous nine/zero ruling. Weissman also put four Merril executives in jail for a year. Those convictions were also overturned in that case by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. This is why we have to question the decision of Robert Muller making these people like Weissman, and only Democratic donors, why given this history was he ever appointed? And why Muller filled that team with people who gave money to Hillary Clinton, the DNC, over $50,000 to candidates like this and Barrack Obama?
Also, a big follow up tonight on our exclusive reporting last night on the Clinton bought and paid for phony Russian propaganda dossier with all that salacious material that we have confirmed has been used, was used by the Obama administration to literally surveile members of the Trump campaign team and then, president-elect Donald Trump and members of his transition team.
Now, we've been all over this story from the beginning, but just to give you an idea of how serious this is, sources telling me, this is all going to be proven right. To quote him, "Hannity, you're way over the target at low altitude. And everyone on the 'destroy Trump' media will be proven so wrong on so many levels." He said, "You can't even imagine how bad this is gonna get."
Now, in addition to the phony dossier, being used to destroy members on the Trump campaign, Sarah Carter is reporting, and we have confirmed this, that information about this systemic FISA abuse will also be exposed soon; maybe as early as next week.
Now, surveiling the Trump campaign isn't the only incident, it goes way beyond that. This is the real, Russia Scandal, the media has never reported on. And it has nothing to do with what the "fake news" media has been spoon feeding the entire country for the past year on the Trump/Russia collusion, it doesn't exist! There's no evidence. Even top Democrats have been telling us, but nobody listens. And they still keep reporting it anyway. Unimaginable, take a look: [Video montage follows]
Now, instead, the real collusion involves Hillary Clinton and the DNC spending millions of dollars trying to influence an election by funding all of this salacious, Russian source dossie', that the Obama administration then used to spy on an opposition party in a presidential election year. President Trump himself reacting by tweeting;
Let's go back to October, 2015, the Washington Free Beacon, they paid FusionGPS to do standard, political, op research then candidate Donald Trump. It had nothing to do with Russian sources. Christopher Steele was not involved at all; the MI6 agent. Then in April of last year, when it was clear that Trump would be the Republican nominee, back in 2016, Hillary Clinton and the DNC, that Donna Brazile said Clinton controlled - especially the money - took over the funding of the project. All tolled, they would pay FusionGPS over $10 million through a law firm. By the way, the DNC, Hillary's campaign, they used the same law firm.
And the former British spy, Christopher Steele, then, at that point, when the Democrats were paying him, Hillary's paying him, he gets involved in June of that year. Now, keep in mind, according to Vanity Fair, Steele has paid Russian sources over the years as part of his "job". And during that summer, Steele, quickly goes to work, using current and former Russian government sources to produce what we now know is the phony, fake news dossier, that included the salacious and completely false information, including Donald Trump, in Russia at the Ritz-Carlton, Moscow, with hookers, urinating on beds. Wow!
Now, keep in mind, former F.B.I. Director, James Comey, he even testified under oath that the content of the dossier were unverified. Well, that apparently did not stop Steele from reportedly briefing news outlets, let's see, like the New York Times, the Washington Post, Yahoo News, the New Yorker, and fake news CNN, all about the dossier.
Now that may mean Steele was trying to influence the election with a dossier that Clinton paid for. Of course Clinton wanted this. Then fast forward, November 28th, according to reporter, David Kramer, an ally of Senator John McCain, he meets with Steele. Steele agrees to give him a copy of the dossier to give McCain, which Kramer does. Then, in early 2016, McCain then gives the dossie to the F.B.I. Director, James Comey. See how it all tying together?
And in January of last year, BuzzFeed, well they decided to publish this fake dossier that President Trump's personal attorney, Michael Cohen, just this week, is now suing over deffimation. Now here's where it gets shocking. According to reports, during the summer of 2016, former Trump campaign associate, remember Carter Paige, he's spied on. They used the FISA warrant. And we've found out from other reporting, that former Trump Campaign Chairman, Paul Manifort, he was surveilled before, and after the election. And now, thanks to Sara Carter and John Solomon and others, we have confirmed tonight, this new information, through three separate sources. We started it last night.
The Clinton funded dossier with all that salacious material, that was used as a justification to obtain FISA warrants to spy on member of the Trump campaign, and then the President-elect. And we're learning more about the dossier from the very guy who helped create it, because Senator Feinstein released his congressional testimony. Now Feinstein's excuse is pretty lame, and pretty lame, she told NBC News today that the reason she released the information and the exchange with Congress, because, well, she had a bad cold. And the dog ate my homework! And that slowed down her mental abilities. Wow, really? So, what Feinstein did was a major breach of trust with Senate investigators, but actually, it provided some very interesting information.
Let's give you some. Alright, Glenn Simpson, of FusionGPS, alright, during that testimony, that he said he never even bothered to verify. What? Not even bother to verify? What Steele brought him from his Russian sources. And that he was against Donald Trump during the election. Shocking!
And we also know that Simpson met, remember? He met with the Russian lawyer, both before and after the meeting at Trump Tower. Remember the one with Don Jr. and Manifort and Jared Kushner in June of 2016. Oh, we're really supposed to believe that Glenn Simpson, who hates Trump, who never verified the dossier, that it's a mere coincidence that he's meeting with this Russian; as he testified to? And Simpson also met with former top DOJ official, remember, Bruce Ohr. Now tying that together. And Ohr's wife, Nellie, actually worked for FusionGPS.
I know this is a lot of information! Let me explain exactly what this all means. Clinton bought and paid for this phony dossier. This lie, this propaganda. She was hoping the Russian propaganda and lies would influence the general election. The Obama administration then politicized, and as I've been warning about, weaponized these powerful tools that we give our intelligence community and they used them to go after an opposition party in a presidential election year. So, we have Clinton putting the fix in. Remember, Bernie Sanders? We learned, from Donna Brazile the fix was in in the primary. It was a done deal. Bernie had no shot. The fix was also in... think about this, wit the Clintons. With the exoneration, before the investigation, in her email scandal. Remember, it was Comey and Peter Stzok, they were writing a letter of exoneration that they didn't even investigate yet. And then, she, here, was trying to use the dossier to fix the general election.
So, what's being exposed are massive abuses of our constitutional and civil liberties. Our fourth amendment rights and protections against unreasonable search and seizure. And this is now, reaching a point that you can't even imagine. Top government officials, at the top of your government; they're all involved. They will be exposed!"
The show then goes on to discuss these facts with three guests; Sarah Carter, Peter Schwitzer, author of Clinton Cash, and FOX News legal analyst, Greg Jarrett.
The following is a transcript from Sean Hannity's evening show on FOX News for today, January 11th, which I've recorded and transcribed myself. (As soon as I get the video of this portion of his openning monolog for this show, I will post it for those who would rather view it, than read it.)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Alright, the evidence of corruption and bias inside Inspector Muller's team, it just keeps piling up. Now, it does get complicated, I promise we'll go step by step, we'll break it all down for you tonight. But breaking right now, Sara Carter, investigative reporter, is now telling us that the top investigator, the guy we've been telling you about, Andrew Weissman, he met with journalist from the AP last April to discuss the news outlets' investigation into Paul Manifort. Now, the next day, the AP published a major expose' about Paul Manifort and alleged money laundering. And sources are telling Sarah Carter that the AP reporters in that meeting, they were actually promising to share documents and other information about Manifort with the Dept. of Justice. There's going to be a lot of news in the coming weeks about the media and all of the role they're playing in all of this. Now the AP tonight is denying this,saying it's categorically untrue.
Now, at the time of this conversation Weissman was the head of the department's fraud division and would, a short time later, would join Muller's team, the following month. And according to the report, Weissman notified his superiors about the sit-down with the AP reporters, and during that time he wasn't working for the Manifort case and he didn't have any documents related to it. This shows Weissman had prejudice going into the investigation against Paul Manifort.
Now, that's on top of his troubling history of Weissman, he led the controversial obstruction of justice case, remember, Arthur Anderson and the Enron scandal? Remember, he destroyed that company, tens of thousands of people lost their job, that verdict was later overturned in a Supreme Court unanimous nine/zero ruling. Weissman also put four Merril executives in jail for a year. Those convictions were also overturned in that case by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. This is why we have to question the decision of Robert Muller making these people like Weissman, and only Democratic donors, why given this history was he ever appointed? And why Muller filled that team with people who gave money to Hillary Clinton, the DNC, over $50,000 to candidates like this and Barrack Obama?
Also, a big follow up tonight on our exclusive reporting last night on the Clinton bought and paid for phony Russian propaganda dossier with all that salacious material that we have confirmed has been used, was used by the Obama administration to literally surveile members of the Trump campaign team and then, president-elect Donald Trump and members of his transition team.
Now, we've been all over this story from the beginning, but just to give you an idea of how serious this is, sources telling me, this is all going to be proven right. To quote him, "Hannity, you're way over the target at low altitude. And everyone on the 'destroy Trump' media will be proven so wrong on so many levels." He said, "You can't even imagine how bad this is gonna get."
Now, in addition to the phony dossier, being used to destroy members on the Trump campaign, Sarah Carter is reporting, and we have confirmed this, that information about this systemic FISA abuse will also be exposed soon; maybe as early as next week.
Now, surveiling the Trump campaign isn't the only incident, it goes way beyond that. This is the real, Russia Scandal, the media has never reported on. And it has nothing to do with what the "fake news" media has been spoon feeding the entire country for the past year on the Trump/Russia collusion, it doesn't exist! There's no evidence. Even top Democrats have been telling us, but nobody listens. And they still keep reporting it anyway. Unimaginable, take a look: [Video montage follows]
"Well, you know, the allegation, of course, is that the Russians, and the hacking and dumping of documents in the election, um, had essentially relationships with Trump campaign people. But, I'm not prepared to say that there's proof you could take to a jury." [Rep. Adam Schiff on MSNBC] June 18, 2017
"Do you agree with this conclusion that was reached, that there was no evidence of collusion?" [Stephonnopolis on ABC]
"You know, we don't have any seen of that, George. And we've been looking through everything they possibly have. Uh, that has not led to that." [Unidentified Congressman in repsonse] June 11, 2017
"The last time I spoke to you, Senator, I asked if you had actually seen evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians, and you said to me - I'm quoting you now you said, 'No, not at this time.' Has anything changed since we spoke last?" [Blitzer on CNN]
"Well, not... not ye..., no it hasn't." [Feinstein in response] June 18, 2017
"Just to be clear, there'sevidence, there's not been any actual evidence, yet." [Unidentified reporter on MSNBC]
"No, it has not, yet!" [Rep. Maxine Waters in response] May 18, 2017Nooo, not yet.
Now, instead, the real collusion involves Hillary Clinton and the DNC spending millions of dollars trying to influence an election by funding all of this salacious, Russian source dossie', that the Obama administration then used to spy on an opposition party in a presidential election year. President Trump himself reacting by tweeting;
"Disproven, and paid for by Democrats. Dossie used to spy on Trump campaign. Did F.B.I. use intel tool to influence the election? @foxandfriends Did Dems or Clinton also pay Russians? Where are hidden and smashed servers? [He's asking questions.] Where are crooked Hillary's emails? What a mess!"By the way, it's only getting bigger. Now the President raises some very Constitutional questions here. There's so much about this dossier that we still don't know about. But here's what we do know. And we're going to break this down and dissect this entire scandal, so that everybody understands it; even fake news - CNN - they may understand how serious this really is.
Let's go back to October, 2015, the Washington Free Beacon, they paid FusionGPS to do standard, political, op research then candidate Donald Trump. It had nothing to do with Russian sources. Christopher Steele was not involved at all; the MI6 agent. Then in April of last year, when it was clear that Trump would be the Republican nominee, back in 2016, Hillary Clinton and the DNC, that Donna Brazile said Clinton controlled - especially the money - took over the funding of the project. All tolled, they would pay FusionGPS over $10 million through a law firm. By the way, the DNC, Hillary's campaign, they used the same law firm.
And the former British spy, Christopher Steele, then, at that point, when the Democrats were paying him, Hillary's paying him, he gets involved in June of that year. Now, keep in mind, according to Vanity Fair, Steele has paid Russian sources over the years as part of his "job". And during that summer, Steele, quickly goes to work, using current and former Russian government sources to produce what we now know is the phony, fake news dossier, that included the salacious and completely false information, including Donald Trump, in Russia at the Ritz-Carlton, Moscow, with hookers, urinating on beds. Wow!
Now, keep in mind, former F.B.I. Director, James Comey, he even testified under oath that the content of the dossier were unverified. Well, that apparently did not stop Steele from reportedly briefing news outlets, let's see, like the New York Times, the Washington Post, Yahoo News, the New Yorker, and fake news CNN, all about the dossier.
Now that may mean Steele was trying to influence the election with a dossier that Clinton paid for. Of course Clinton wanted this. Then fast forward, November 28th, according to reporter, David Kramer, an ally of Senator John McCain, he meets with Steele. Steele agrees to give him a copy of the dossier to give McCain, which Kramer does. Then, in early 2016, McCain then gives the dossie to the F.B.I. Director, James Comey. See how it all tying together?
And in January of last year, BuzzFeed, well they decided to publish this fake dossier that President Trump's personal attorney, Michael Cohen, just this week, is now suing over deffimation. Now here's where it gets shocking. According to reports, during the summer of 2016, former Trump campaign associate, remember Carter Paige, he's spied on. They used the FISA warrant. And we've found out from other reporting, that former Trump Campaign Chairman, Paul Manifort, he was surveilled before, and after the election. And now, thanks to Sara Carter and John Solomon and others, we have confirmed tonight, this new information, through three separate sources. We started it last night.
The Clinton funded dossier with all that salacious material, that was used as a justification to obtain FISA warrants to spy on member of the Trump campaign, and then the President-elect. And we're learning more about the dossier from the very guy who helped create it, because Senator Feinstein released his congressional testimony. Now Feinstein's excuse is pretty lame, and pretty lame, she told NBC News today that the reason she released the information and the exchange with Congress, because, well, she had a bad cold. And the dog ate my homework! And that slowed down her mental abilities. Wow, really? So, what Feinstein did was a major breach of trust with Senate investigators, but actually, it provided some very interesting information.
Let's give you some. Alright, Glenn Simpson, of FusionGPS, alright, during that testimony, that he said he never even bothered to verify. What? Not even bother to verify? What Steele brought him from his Russian sources. And that he was against Donald Trump during the election. Shocking!
And we also know that Simpson met, remember? He met with the Russian lawyer, both before and after the meeting at Trump Tower. Remember the one with Don Jr. and Manifort and Jared Kushner in June of 2016. Oh, we're really supposed to believe that Glenn Simpson, who hates Trump, who never verified the dossier, that it's a mere coincidence that he's meeting with this Russian; as he testified to? And Simpson also met with former top DOJ official, remember, Bruce Ohr. Now tying that together. And Ohr's wife, Nellie, actually worked for FusionGPS.
I know this is a lot of information! Let me explain exactly what this all means. Clinton bought and paid for this phony dossier. This lie, this propaganda. She was hoping the Russian propaganda and lies would influence the general election. The Obama administration then politicized, and as I've been warning about, weaponized these powerful tools that we give our intelligence community and they used them to go after an opposition party in a presidential election year. So, we have Clinton putting the fix in. Remember, Bernie Sanders? We learned, from Donna Brazile the fix was in in the primary. It was a done deal. Bernie had no shot. The fix was also in... think about this, wit the Clintons. With the exoneration, before the investigation, in her email scandal. Remember, it was Comey and Peter Stzok, they were writing a letter of exoneration that they didn't even investigate yet. And then, she, here, was trying to use the dossier to fix the general election.
So, what's being exposed are massive abuses of our constitutional and civil liberties. Our fourth amendment rights and protections against unreasonable search and seizure. And this is now, reaching a point that you can't even imagine. Top government officials, at the top of your government; they're all involved. They will be exposed!"
The show then goes on to discuss these facts with three guests; Sarah Carter, Peter Schwitzer, author of Clinton Cash, and FOX News legal analyst, Greg Jarrett.
Wednesday, January 10, 2018
Liberals No Longer Care About Facts
Have you noticed, as I have, how the liberals have over the past decade abandon interest in law and order, national unity under the concept of patriotism, or a public education system that is focused on facts and indisputable truths? Is it a coincidence that this was the same period in which we had what I believe was the most divisive and polarizing president in our nation's history? I thank God Trump's work over his first year in office has negated a lot of what Obama enacted!
Has it occurred to you from what you've witnessed regarding various national policies, such as immigration, police, and free speech, that liberals have engaged in a psychological gamesmanship where if an issue is debated, say on a show like Tucker Carlson's, their standard response to a pointed question is either to deny any validity to it, or just plain ignore the question and drone on about the talking points they want to get on the air? How pathetic!
Let's get specific. Voter fraud is one instance in which they're winning the battle in the media and with Pres. Trump attempting to look into it's potential impact on our democratic process. It's as though they're taking the concept of power residing in the people to an extreme. In other words, damn the possibility that there may be illegals who are managing to vote when they shouldn't be, they have rights too! Yet, under our laws, they're not suppose to be able to vote.
Whenever the issue of immigration is spoken of by most liberals today, they speak in terms of "human rights" as though that somehow has a transferring power to constitutional rights automatically. That was never the intent or meaning behind the laws which have been in place since the founding of this country.
Here... watch this video by Dick Morris to understand better what I'm getting at when it comes to voter fraud. While I hope Dick is wrong regarding Trump giving up on this issue by handing it over to Homeland Security, I am concerned that he appears to be getting a bit worn down by the persistent resistance current the liberals in the media and the swamp are putting in him.
Has it occurred to you from what you've witnessed regarding various national policies, such as immigration, police, and free speech, that liberals have engaged in a psychological gamesmanship where if an issue is debated, say on a show like Tucker Carlson's, their standard response to a pointed question is either to deny any validity to it, or just plain ignore the question and drone on about the talking points they want to get on the air? How pathetic!
Let's get specific. Voter fraud is one instance in which they're winning the battle in the media and with Pres. Trump attempting to look into it's potential impact on our democratic process. It's as though they're taking the concept of power residing in the people to an extreme. In other words, damn the possibility that there may be illegals who are managing to vote when they shouldn't be, they have rights too! Yet, under our laws, they're not suppose to be able to vote.
Whenever the issue of immigration is spoken of by most liberals today, they speak in terms of "human rights" as though that somehow has a transferring power to constitutional rights automatically. That was never the intent or meaning behind the laws which have been in place since the founding of this country.
Here... watch this video by Dick Morris to understand better what I'm getting at when it comes to voter fraud. While I hope Dick is wrong regarding Trump giving up on this issue by handing it over to Homeland Security, I am concerned that he appears to be getting a bit worn down by the persistent resistance current the liberals in the media and the swamp are putting in him.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)