Tuesday, February 5, 2019

Political Posturing By The Left Over Wall

In a recent post, I shared an overview of various situations and acts by the Leftists in Congress and the country which explain how the leftists have done their best to obstruct the president's efforts to do anything.

Now, news has broke that just yesterday - Monday, February 4th - they've introduced a bill to prevent Pres. Trump from being able to use any resources to build any border barriers or structures to impede the immigrants coming into the country illegally.

For me, it's not the bill they've introduced, as much as it is the intent to try and control the president's ability to execute his Constitutional duty of protecting the country in what is clearly a long overdue crisis which must be dealt with in light of the fact that we now have several more immigrants coming north through Mexico from an assortment of Central American countries. (My search resulted in only one report. "Tech Tyranny" is alive and well!)

And the excuse used to justify this bill is that it creates an unequal power between the legislative and executive branches of government. That's so laughable because they know that this is how the Constitution was and is set up, but they - in their ongoing effort to manufacture in the public's mind that something exists, which does not - they're attempting to generate significant public support for their side of a phantom argument. They realize they're losing this battle and becoming desperate.

To more clearly illustrate this point about the Democrats' tactics, I urge my readers to watch this Senate speech and learn how, during the shutdown, they absolutely refused to vote for a bill that the Republicans introduced which would pay the Coast Guard for purely political reasons. Over 2.3 million views already!



Anyone who knows the basic process by which bills are introduced in either house of Congress, this act by Speaker Pelosi - and, of course, supported by Sen. Schumer in the Senate - is no more than political posturing and will certainly die in the Senate. More importantly, they know full well that even if it did pass in the Senate by some miracle - given that the Senate is majority Republican, the president still has to sign such a bill into law. Like... DUH!!! that's going to happen.

This, clearly, is the Leftists doing their best to fire up public sentiment against the president in waging their war on his efforts to deal with the crisis. We who support the president need to call and/or write our senators and representative to express our sentiments about this absurd bill knowing full well that Pres. Trump has the Constitutional authority to declare a national emergency. In fact, last night on Tucker Carlson Tonight, it was pointed out that there have been multiple national emergencies declared by presidents of which some have gone on for as long as nine years.

Monday, February 4, 2019

What's the Positive Side of Things Today?



I must admit that, when I first saw Diamond & Silk burst onto the national scene, I was skeptical as to whether they were sincere and real; suspicious that they were just being opportunists. However, it's obvious to me, now that enough time and evidence has demonstrated that they're for real, [When the social media platforms censor them, you know they're being effective.] I am grateful to see what they're doing and have accomplished to promote conservative values for our nation.

I know I harp a lot on what's going on, in a negative light, so I thought I'd share this short video of Jesse Watters, of "Watter's World", interviewing Diamond & Silk and how their tour across the nation has gone over the last year. The sharing of positive things happens half-way through, so don't quit watching too soon. They provide us a positive perspective on what they've encountered as they meet, talk to people on the street, and share their findings with Jesse.

Healing Our Nation!

This was shared by a good friend who shares my values and once was a Democrat, until he realized the party left him by becoming too radicalized. My research on this event reveals that this obviously occurred years ago, but is verified. In fact, if the minister's name is used in the search term, a few videos regarding it appear. In one of them the actual prayer is read aloud by another man who apparently is a friend of the minister, but some words, or sentences are slightly different.
= = = = = = = = = = = =
Prayer given in Kansas State Senate:


   If this doesn't say it all, then I don't know what does. Thought you might enjoy this interesting prayer given in Kansas at the opening session of their [state] Senate. It seems prayer still upsets some people.. When Minister Joe Wright was asked to open the new session of the Kansas Senate, everyone was expecting the usual generalities; but this is what they heard:

   "Heavenly Father, we come before you today to ask your forgiveness and to seek your direction and guidance.  We know Your Word says, 'Woe to those who call evil good,' but that is exactly what we have done. We have lost our spiritual equilibrium and reversed our values. We have exploited the poor and called it the lottery. We have rewarded laziness and called it welfare. We have killed our unborn and called it choice. We have shot abortionists and called it justifiable. We have neglected to discipline our children and called it building self-esteem. We have abused power and called it politics. We have coveted our neighbor's possession and called it ambition. We have polluted the air with profanity and pornography and called it freedom of expression. We have ridiculed the time honored values of our forefathers and called it enlightenment. Search us, oh, God, and know our hearts today; cleanse us from every sin and set us free. Amen!"  


The response was immediate. A number of legislators walked out during the prayer in protest. [They couldn't stand hearing the truth.]
       In 6 short weeks, Central Christian Church, where Rev. Wright is pastor, logged more than 5,000 phone calls with only 47 of those calls responding negatively. The church is now receiving international requests for copies of this prayer from India, Africa and Korea.  With the Lord's help, may this prayer sweep over our nation and wholeheartedly become our desire so that we again can be called 'one nation under God.'
 = = = = = = = = = =

Since this event occurred our nation's political scene has clearly become less respectful and courteous and more visceral and contentious. Here's a short video from PragerU which illustrates this point clearly. I hope it will help in understanding where I'm coming from, because his explanation of our current situation is "spot on"!

Friday, February 1, 2019

How Do Civil Wars Happen?

The Civil War we know about and understand is a historical event which happened in 1861 - 1865, or 158 years ago.

The man who's most noted as the key figure in this war was Abraham Lincoln who was the first Republican president to be elected. We also learned that the reason why the Republican Party came to be was because a former party - the Whigs - gradually fell out of favor with the voters of the country over several decades prior.

Why do I make this point? Because it's become obvious to me that history is about to repeat itself. Only this time, it will be the Democrat Party's turn.

When two or more sides disagree on who should run the country and these sides can't settle this question through our election process as the accepted way to decide who's in charge, a civil war begins to percolate across the country. Thank God it hasn't already broken out!

Back in the late 1850s this circumstance occurred, just as it is occurring today. Only today, when you stop accepting election results - as in 2000 and our most recent election of 2016 - you have a civil war brewing. Once Lincoln was in office, the press savaged him regarding his handling of the war which broke out over the issue of slavery and state's rights. The only real difference between then, and now, is that there was an expected level of decorum and social decency during Lincoln's term. Today... forget it! (Then too, we know how Lincoln's second term ended. I pray it doesn't happen again.)

Simply put, the Mueller investigation - for those of us who've done our research on the facts about this, which the vast majority of the Media (D) will not disclose to their viewers - is about removing President Trump from office and overturning the results of the 2016 election. Consider the fact that, after the mid-terms, that in the now dominated House run by Speaker Pelosi, we're witnessing impeachment proceedings gearing up. I can't help but wonder, is this payback for impeaching Pres. Clinton over being "Lewinskied" in a side room of the Oval Office?

But, this is not the first time a Republican president has been elected recently where the Democrats said he didn't really win. We saw weeks of ballot recounts and the Florida State Supreme Court finally was overruled by the U.S. Supreme Court to give "Bush 43" the nod over Al Gore; the Democratic Party nominee. (Wait, didn't we just have another similar debacle about votes in Florida in our last mid-term elections? How interesting!)

Fast forward to Trump winning the election in 2016, much to the dumbfounded shock and disbelief of the Media (D), and all of a sudden this president can't do anything. He can't undo the DACA law his predecessor enacted illegally. No, a Republican president isn't allowed to have total and complete 'discretion' to reverse anything a Democrat president did.

Do you recognize a pattern here? If the Democrats rejected "Bush 43's" win and the media pummeled him relentlessly over his two terms in office - remember how they made him out to be stupid and "cowboyish" - and the same thing is happening when the next Republican winner who's an "outsider" gets into to office over their presumptive winner, what does it mean? It means that they don't accept any results when they don't win. It also means that they don't accept that transfers of power from one party to another are determined by elections as practiced for over two centuries now. Remember when, shortly after the 2016 election, we heard talk from the Democrats about abolishing the Electoral College?

So, in my view, this is a new civil war simmering!

The only difference between the last one, and this one, is that there's no shooting. Well, at least yet. There was that one off incident in Virginia where the guy attempted to kill a bunch of Republican Congressman playing at a baseball game practice and nearly killing Congressman Scalise. 

Democrats claim they're practicing "resistance". And, the more time goes by, the more we learn about the ranks of bureaucrats who've been in their agency positions during Obummer's two terms and are still there, and the subversive acts those bureaucrats are implementing to sabotage our current president's efforts to enact real, meaningful changes to our nation's policies on all levels.

Such revelations are making it more and more clear that the Democrats really want a form of soft dictatorship wrapped in a socialist blanket. Their very own dictatorship. The only legitimate form of power, in this country according to the Democrats, is its own. After they lost the Congress, and the White House, they implemented their "plan B"; ruling the country via Federal Court judges and bureaucrats.

How many times have we seen the president enact an executive order - the same type of action by the previous president - only to have some judge in Hawaii or Seattle slap an injunction on it because it went against their policy on the issue? Folks, that's a form of civil war by usurping a president's authority. As we all know, our system of government is based on the Constitution. However, that doesn't seem to be the way our system's now being run! Fits right into their notion of a "living document" that morphs to their needs, doesn't it?

As the Democrats see it, their system is that any part of the government that it runs through their infiltration of nearly every level - from city, to state, to federal - gets total and unlimited power over the entire country. When Pres. Obummer was in the White House, he could do anything. Think back for a second. He gave temporary amnesty to a select group of illegal aliens. He also told you that you could keep your current health insurance plan or doctor if you liked either, or both, over 20 times and for several months leading up to the passage of the bill. He also told us repeatedly that we'd save an average of $2,500 per person! Speaker Pelosi told us we had to pass it before we knew what it would contain. Then, after passing, we learned that we'd be fined for not having the "Affordable Healthcare" which wasn't affordable at all, and premiums skyrocketed!

Let's not forget that when Democrat presidents are in office, states aren't allowed to enforce federal immigration law; especially when it goes against his policy. Remember Arizona? Yet, when a Republican president is in office, states - like California - can create their own immigration laws; like being a sanctuary state, or Governor Jerry Brown saying that his state is an independent republic and can sign treaties with other countries. Well folks, the Constitution has something to say about that! (Sadly, but perhaps for a very good reason we don't yet know, or understand, nothing's been done about these abuses of law.)

No, the left can move power around, whether it's federal, state, executive, legislative or judiciary, to run the country when their party isn't in the White House these days. Thus, their moving form of dictatorship is to control every institution and make it the supreme power of the land whenever a Republican president is in the executive branch.

If this president has done anything of major significance, it is to expose the professional government, also known as the massive bureaucracy they've carefully nurtured and grown over several decades. In other words, it has become a guild much like the ones that existed in the medieval days. You are not allowed to serve in it if you're not a member. You must be indoctrinated into its arcane rituals. Intersectionality, global warming or climate change that's going to end the world in just 12 more years, you know, that sort of stuff. And Trump definitely isn't in the club. Since he brought in a bunch of people who also aren't in the club, we're seeing results which make the amateurs who've never held a real job in the Obummer administration look utterly incompetent. But that's because they have no clue what works; only their utopian dreams. Trade deals, foreign policy re-alignments, record employment for all groups, the list goes on and on.

Instead, the Democrats spy on them, investigate them and send some of Trump's low level operatives to jail for process crimes of not being able to keep dates, times, or places straight. They use the only thing they know and understand... power as a dictator would.

That's NOT a free country!

FBI agents who adamantly support the Democrat Party's nominee and take out "an insurance policy" against the opposition candidate from winning the election, and when their president's officials engage in the massive unmasking of their opposition, or when power players aligned with the loser ban free speech rights of conservatives on social media platforms, but more importantly, when all of the above collude together to overturn an election's outcome because their candidate was supposed to win and the opposition was supposed to lose, but did, then we don't have a free country; we have a two tiered justice system and tyranny.

And now, we are going through the issue of funding the wall. After the longest ever government shutdown because of the Democrat's refusal to even negotiate a compromise with Pres. Trump, he's given them what they wanted by providing a three week period to reopen the government in order to sit down and talk, with the condition that the president will call for a national emergency if an agreement isn't reached. Yet, both Sen. Schumer and Speaker Pelosi are reneging on what they asked for, and no progress is forthcoming as of this date. Most of us don't really understand what this could portend if the nation is under the cloud of a national emergency. Perhaps we'll find out.

Let's be very clear! We are in a civil war, folks. It's between Conservative volunteer government that serves the true power base - the interest of the people - and the leftists Democrat professionals in government who desire to implement a dictatorship using socialism as their new banner held up by Alexandria Ocassio-Cortez; the all knowing.

Thursday, January 31, 2019

Why So Radical, Speaker Pelosi?


The conservative media - FOX News, and radio talk show hosts like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Mark Levin, as well as even many of the more local hosts - have all been remarking how the Democrats in Congress - especially Senate Minority Leader Schumer and House Speaker Pelosi - are becoming extreme radical leftists when it comes to funding President Trump's request for the southern border wall.

For those who only catch the news in the typical passing fashion on the radio during their commute home to, or from work, or watch the evening broadcast on television, awareness of what's actually behind this sudden increased intensity against anything to do with the immigration crisis is only speculative at best, and conspiracy theory at worst.

This week, after a record setting Federal Government shutdown of 35 days, we've learned from Speaker Pelosi that no funding for the president's border wall will be in any bills the House produces during this three week renegotiating period Trump agreed to after the Democrats asked for the government to be re-opened before they'd negotiate anything. So, they've revealed their true intentions; get funds for government workers flowing again so they can claim a political victory and make the president look like he caved to them. 

It begs the question... how is it that the Democratic Speaker of the House can be so hardened? You'd think they'd realize they've got to at look like they're trying to negotiate a compromise. There's got to be something going on that explains this stance on Speaker Pelosi's part.

There is now a report which, given the circumstances of the war against drugs our nation has been fighting with what seems like increasing futility for decades now, that explains with common sense and reason the actual motive behind it all. This report, by reporter Frank Holmes posted an article on January 15th of this year - 2019 - information that exposes the fact that Pablo Escobar's brother is pouring millions of funding into efforts to politically destroy the president and stopping any building of a wall which will cut off their flow of drugs from Columbia into the United States.

Now, I realize that this report from Mr. Holmes doesn't go as far as to accuse the Democrats in either house of Congress of taking Escobar's money to make sure the wall doesn't get built, but he does hint that they've entertained those who may have.

Any logically thinking individual with a smidgen of common sense doesn't have to strain their intelligence to suspect that this most likely is the case; their campaign coffers - or fencing organizations - are being filled with Columbian "mulla", "casholla", whatever you wish to call it, and they don't dare cross the Medellin drug cartel. And, let's not forget, Hillary Clinton has been caught, through her own foundation, to have acquired funds for her campaign in less than above board means and ways.

While I did post this article of Mr. Holmes back on January 15th, it may be too far back in our era of moment-by-moment news for some to remember, or missed it, so I'll re-post it below. Read it, and it will all fall in place.

= = = = = = = = = = = =


EXPOSED: Foreign drug kingpin behind “Impeach Trump” movement
January 15, 2019
 
by Frank Holmes, reporter
It’s no secret that Democrats want Donald Trump impeached — but you won’t believe the blood-soaked international criminal they’ve teamed up with in order to make it happen.
Their new partner is Roberto de Jesús Escobar Gaviria. The American public might know him better as the older brother of Pablo Escobar… and the co-founder of the Medellin drug cartel!
Roberto launched a campaign to raise $50 million to impeach President Trump — and he’s looking to the Democrats and the Deep State to make his dreams come true.
“He is the worst cockroach in history!” he said.
Roberto, who goes by the nickname “El Osito” (“The Little Bear”), even seemed to threaten to assassinate the president.
“Cockroaches don’t die easily but when they do, they do it on their backs with their feet up and intimate parts exposed,” Escobar said. “Remember that I said that.”
“My brother Pablo killed hundreds of judges and thousands of policemen,” he admitted. The Escobars’ crime syndicate killed 6,000 people every year in their hometown alone.
But instead of ordering a hit like they would in some Third World banana republic, the Escobars have new partners in the Democratic Party.
“This time we will do it the legal way, peacefully,” Roberto said.
Instead of murder, he plans to use one of the drug cartels’ favorite tools: Bribery.
“If we pay the right connections, they will come forward and testify in Congress and co-operate with Robert Mueller,” Roberto said.
His website says he will also “pay for professional lobbyists to go against Donald Trump.”
The Democrats filed articles of impeachment on the very first day they controlled the House of Representatives…and they’ll take help anyplace they can get it!
Escobar is already well on the way toward his goal: A screenshot shows that he raised almost $10.8 million before GoFundMe pulled the page for the campaign, which he called, “Bye, Bye, Trump!”
Now, he’s launched his own website — ImpeachTrumpFund.com — and a cryptocurrency called the “ESCOBAR token” to accept donations.
When asked why he was so obsessed with driving Trump out of office, Roberto played the race card—saying he hated Trump’s “discrimination of the Latino American people.”
But the real reason Colombian drug lords hate the president is obvious: At one time, the Medellin cartel was responsible for 80% of all cocaine that flowed into the United States.
And Donald Trump’s border wall would shred their profits.
“The cost of illegal drugs exceeds $500 billion a year, vastly more than the $5.7 billion we have requested from Congress,” Trump said in his Oval Office address.
Politicians have known this for decades… but nobody dared to do anything about it until Trump.
“Most of the cocaine, foreign-source marijuana and methamphetamine, and Mexican-source heroin available in the United States is smuggled into the country across the (Southwest border),” the FBI testified before Congress in 2010.
The Mexican border is “particularly vulnerable to drug smuggling because of the enormous volume of people” crossing, agents said.
Now Trump wants to pay for the wall by cutting into drug traffickers’ profits…and El Osito isn’t going to let that happen.
“Nobody is as bad as Trump!” Escobar said.
The Democrats agree—nobody is as bad as Trump, even the co-founder of the world’s deadliest cocaine cartel.
Escobar said he’s accepting donations from all over the world—Russia, China, Cuba and his buddies in South America’s thriving drug cartels.
But have the Democrats—who want to impeach Trump over “Russian collusion”— promised not to meet with the pro-impeachment lobbyists Escobar and his drug-running associates will pay for with their blood money?
Of course not.
Have Fake News reporters—who spent every waking minute of the last two years trying to paint Trump as a Russian tool—reported that Colombian drug lords have marked our president for removal from office?
Their coverage has been an embarrassment — only the entertainment media reported this blockbuster story at all!
So far only TMZ and BET have reported on Escobar’s impeachment scheme.
Some overseas outlets like the Asia Times, Russia’s Sputnik News, and a slew of British tabloids (but not the BBC) have picked it up.
The Herald of Nigeria even has a story… but not a single major U.S. media outlet.
CNN? Zip.
Rachel Maddow? Nada.
“Morning Joe”? Zilch.
The fact that the Democrats haven’t refused to meet with anyone who could have received a dollar from this death merchant — and their buddies in the media have covered it up — is the real foreign collusion story.
Frank Holmes is a reporter for The Horn News. He is a veteran journalist and an outspoken conservative that talks about the news that was in his weekly article, “On The Holmes Front.”

Wednesday, January 30, 2019

Take A Deep Breath, And Hold It, Please!

First, the credentials of who's making the following point:


Ian Rutherford Plimer is an Australian geologist, professor emeritus of earth sciences at the University of Melbourne , professor of mining geology at the University of Adelaide , and the director of multiple mineral exploration and mining companies. He has published 130 scientific papers, six books and edited the Encyclopedia of Geology.

Born: 12 February 1946 (age 72)
Residence: Australia
Nationality: Australian
Fields of Study: Earth Science, Geology, Mining Engineering
Institutions: University of New England , University of Newcastle , University of Melbourne , University of Adelaide
Alma mater: University of New South Wales , Macquarie University
Thesis: The pipe deposits of tungsten-molybdenum-bismuth in eastern Australia (1976)
Notable Awards: Eureka Prize (1995,2002), Centenary Medal (2003), Clarke Medal        (2004)
 
Where Does the Carbon Dioxide Really Come From ?
 
PLIMER: "Okay, here's the bombshell. The recent volcanic eruption in Iceland . Since its first spewing of volcanic ash has, in just FOUR DAYS, NEGATED EVERY SINGLE EFFORT you have made in the past five years to control CO2 emissions on our planet - all of you.
 
Of course, you know about this evil carbon dioxide that we are trying to suppress - it's that vital chemical compound that every plant requires to live and grow and to synthesize into oxygen for us humans and all animal life.
 
I know....it's very disheartening to realize that all of the carbon emission savings you have accomplished while suffering the inconvenience and expense of driving Prius hybrids, buying fabric grocery bags, sitting up till midnight to finish your kids "The Green Revolution" science project, throwing out all of your non-green cleaning supplies, using only two squares of toilet paper, putting a brick in your toilet tank reservoir, selling your SUV and speedboat, vacationing at home instead of abroad, nearly getting hit every day on your bicycle, replacing all of your 50p light bulbs with £5 light bulbs ..... well, all of those things you have done have all gone down the tubes in just four days.
 
The volcanic ash emitted into the Earth's atmosphere in just four days - yes, FOUR DAYS - by that volcano in Indonesia has totally erased every single effort you have made to   reduce the evil beast, carbon. And there are around 200 active volcanoes on the planet spewing out this crud at any one time - EVERY DAY.
 
I don't really want to rain on your parade too much, but I should mention that when the volcano Mt. Pinatubo erupted in the Philippines in 1991, it spewed out more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than the entire human race had emitted in all its years on earth.

Tuesday, January 29, 2019

I've Been Wondering...

 
I was wondering -  Since only 11 million people have Obama-Care, how will 24 million people die if it is repealed?  Will an additional 13 million people be randomly shot?  (I always wondered about this!)

I was wondering -  If Donald Trump deleted all of his emails, wiped his server with Bleachbit and destroyed all of his phones with a hammer, would the Mainstream Media suddenly lose all interest in the story and declare him innocent.

I was wondering -  If women do the same job for less money, why do companies hire men to do the same job for more money?

I was wondering -  If you rob a bank in a Sanctuary City, is it illegal, or is it just an Undocumented Withdrawal?

I was wondering why -  Each ISIS attack now is a reaction to Pres. Trump's policies, but all ISIS attacks during Pres. Obama's term were due to Climate Change and a plea for jobs.

I was wondering -  After the London 'Lone Wolf' terrorist attack, government officials arrested at least eight other 'Lone Wolves' who had conspired with the original 'Lone Wolf' in planning the 'Lone Wolf' attack.  Why do they tell us, even though all involved are Muslims, government officials assured us, the 'Lone Wolf' attack has nothing at all to do with Islam, just like the other 1,000 plus 'Lone Wolf' attacks by Muslims, are completely unassociated with Islam.

I was thinking -  We should stop calling them all "Entitlements."  Welfare, Food Stamps, WIC, ad nausea are not entitlements. They are taxpayer-funded handouts, and shouldn't be called entitlements at all.   Social Security and Veterans Benefits are Entitlements because the people receiving them are entitled to them; they were earned and paid for by the recipients. [Actually, this is incorrect, because those paying into S.S. are the ones providing funds for recipients of benefits currently since the original funds were raided by Congress decades ago for other programs and left an I.O.U. note in the U.S. Treasury!]

I was wondering -  If Muslims want to run away from a Muslim country, does that mean they're Islamophobic?

I was wondering -  If Liberals don't believe in biological gender then why did they march for women's rights?

I was wondering -  How did the Russians get Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and the DNC to steal the Primary from Bernie Sanders?  Also, how did Russia get Donna Brazile to leak debate questions to Hillary Clinton in advance of the debates?

I was wondering -  How did the Russians get FBI Director James Comey to pardon Hillary Clinton for her email/server scandal more than a month BEFORE he ever had Agent Struck/Stroke/Smerk interview her as part of their investigation?

I was wondering -  Why is it that Democrats think Super delegates are fine, but they have a problem with the Electoral College?

I was wondering -  If you don't want the FBI involved in elections, why did the DNC nominate someone who's being investigated by the FBI.

I was wondering -  If Hillary's speeches cost $250,000 an hour, how come no one shows up to her free ones?

I was wondering -  Why the DNC is mad at Russia because they think they are trying to manipulate our election, when we're now discovering that the DNC is manipulating our election.

I was wondering -  If Democrats don’t want foreigners involved in our elections, why do they think it's all right for illegals to vote?

Just Thinking  —  Somebody better start thinking!