Wednesday, April 24, 2019

Death By A Thousand Cuts?


Most Americans are unaware of the fact that over two hundred years ago the United States had declared war on Islam, and Thomas Jefferson led the charge! 

At the height of the 18th century, Muslim pirates (the "Barbary Pirates") were the terror of the Mediterranean and a large area of the North Atlantic. 

They attacked every ship in sight and held the crews for exorbitant ransoms. Those taken hostage were subjected to barbaric treatment and wrote heart-breaking letters home, begging their governments and families to pay whatever their Mohammedan captors demanded. 

These extortionists of the high seas represented the North African Islamic nations of Tripoli, Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers - collectively referred to as the Barbary Coast - and presented a dangerous and unprovoked threat to the new American Republic. 

Before the Revolutionary War, U.S. merchant ships had been under the protection of Great Britain. When the U.S. declared its independence and entered into war, the ships of the United States were protected by France. 

However, once the war was won, America had to protect its own fleets. 

Thus, the birth of the U.S. Navy. Beginning in 1784, 17 years before he would become president, Thomas Jefferson became America's Minister to France. That same year, the U.S. Congress sought to appease its Muslim adversaries by following in the footsteps of European nations who paid bribes to the Barbary States rather than engaging them in war. 

In July of 1785, Algerian pirates captured American ships, and the Dye of Algiers demanded an unheard-of ransom of $60,000. It was a plain and simple case of extortion, and Thomas Jefferson was vehemently opposed to any further payments. 

Instead, he proposed to Congress the formation of a coalition of allied nations who together could force the Islamic states into peace. A disinterested Congress decided to pay the ransom. 

In 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with Tripoli's ambassador to Great Britain to ask by what right his nation attacked American ships and enslaved American citizens, and why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts. 

The two future presidents reported that Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja had answered that Islam "was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Quran that all nations who would not acknowledge their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise." 

Despite this stunning admission of premeditated violence on non-Muslim nations, as well as the objections of many notable American leaders, including George Washington, who warned that caving in was both wrong and would only further embolden the enemy, for the following fifteen years, the American government paid the Muslims millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages. 

The payments in ransom and tribute amounted to over 20 percent of the United States government annual revenues in 1800. 

Jefferson was disgusted. Shortly after his being sworn in as the third President of the United States in 1801, the Pasha of Tripoli sent him a note demanding the immediate payment of $225,000 plus $25,000 a year for every year forthcoming. 

That changed everything. 

Jefferson let the Pasha know, in no uncertain terms, what he could do with his demand. The Pasha responded by cutting down the flagpole at the American consulate and declared war on the United States. 

Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers immediately followed suit. 

Jefferson, until now, had been against America raising a naval force for anything beyond coastal defense, but, having watched his nation be cowed by Islamic thuggery for long enough, decided that it was finally time to meet force with force. 

He dispatched a squadron of frigates to the Mediterranean and taught the Muslim nations of the Barbary Coast a lesson he hoped they would never forget. Congress authorized Jefferson to empower U.S. ships to seize all vessels and goods of the Pasha of Tripoli and to "cause to be done all other acts of precaution or hostility as the state of war would justify". 

When Algiers and Tunis, who were both accustomed to American cowardice and acquiescence, saw the newly independent United States had both the will and the right to strike back, they quickly abandoned their allegiance to Tripoli. 

The war with Tripoli lasted for four more years and raged up again in 1815. The bravery of the U.S. Marine Corps in these wars led to the line "to the shores of Tripoli" in the Marine Hymn, and they would forever be known as "leathernecks" for the leather collars of their uniforms, designed to prevent their heads from being cut off by the Muslim scimitars when boarding enemy ships. 

Islam, and what its Barbary followers justified doing in the name of their prophet and their god, disturbed Jefferson quite deeply. 

America had a tradition of religious tolerance. In fact, Jefferson, himself, had co-authored the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, but fundamentalist Islam was like no other religion the world had ever seen. 

A religion based on supremacy, whose holy book not only condoned but mandated violence against unbelievers, was unacceptable to him. 

His greatest fear was that someday this brand of Islam would return and pose an even greater threat to the United States. 

This should concern every American. That Muslims have brought about women-only classes and swimming times in America at taxpayer-funded universities and public pools; that Christians, Jews, and Hindus have been banned from serving on juries where Muslim defendants are being judged; Piggy banks and Porky Pig tissue dispensers have been banned from workplaces because they offend Islamist sensibilities; ice cream has been discontinued at certain Burger King locations because the picture on the wrapper looks similar to the Arabic script for Allah; public schools are pulling pork from their menus; on and on and on and on. 

It's death by a thousand cuts, or inch-by-inch as some refer to it, and most Americans have no idea that this battle is being waged every day across America. By not fighting back, by allowing groups to obfuscate what is really happening, and not insisting that the Islamists adapt to our culture, the United States is cutting its own throat with a politically correct knife and helping to further the Islamists' agenda. 

 

Sadly, it appears that today America's leaders would rather be politically correct than victorious!

Here's a related piece which points out more recent events...

Muslims have been at war with the world since the 7th century and it has lasted through the 18th century. However, some will contend it never stopped. This is why many of us who know the truth about this issue choke when we hear someone say we will defeat or contain these Islamic Terrorists in a few years, or even, as Leon Panetta stated during Pres. Obama's administration, "30 years."

The facts below are historically correct.

 
 

The sad thing is that more than half of all politicians do not even know any of this. If these battles had not been won, we would most likely be speaking Arabic, and Christianity could be non-existent. Judaism certainly would NOT exist! Just consider what the PLO, Hamas, Hezbollah, and similar organizations have attempted to do to Israel.

A lot of Americans have become so insulated from reality that they imagine America can suffer defeat without any inconvenience to themselves.

The following events are true historical facts. It has been many years since 1968, but history keeps repeating itself.
 
 
 
 
 
 
6. During the 1980’s, a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon by Muslim Males.
 
 
 
 
 
 
12. In 1998, the United States embassies in Kenya, and Tanzania, were bombed by Muslim Males.
 
13. On 09/11/01, four airliners were hijacked. Two of the planes were used as missiles to take down the World Trade Centers.  One plane crashed into the United States Pentagon, and the other plane was diverted and crashed by the passengers. Thousands of People were Killed by Muslim Males.
 
14. In 2002, the United States fought a war in Afghanistan against Muslim Males.
 
15. In 2002, reporter Daniel Pearl was Kidnapped and beheaded by you guessed it - a Muslim Male. (Plus two other American journalists who had just recently been beheaded.)
 

So, to ensure we Americans never offend anyone - particularly fanatics intent on killing us - Airport Security Screeners will no longer be allowed to profile certain people.

Have Americans completely lost their minds or just their "Power of Reason?"
 
As the writer of the Award Winning story "Forrest Gump" so aptly put it, "Stupid is, as stupid does."


  

Friday, April 19, 2019

Are Unions Helping, or Hurting Its Members?

When I was a full-time teacher and forced to be a member of my local, state and national teacher's union, I highly resented it.

Not only were they taking monthly dues out of my paycheck, but when it came to presidential campaign season, the only union postings in the teacher's lounge were for Democrats. If any conservative teachers complained, they told us to quit whining and pound sand.

In the first third of my 30 year career in the classroom, my state legislature announced that because of the disparity of pay between the western region versus the eastern region of our state, the legislature in their infinite wisdom would take all school districts off of the levy system that individual districts imposed on taxpayers' property and put all teachers in the state on the allocation model set by them. Teachers across the state would get the same pay whether they lived in Ritzville on the east side and paid only $500/month rent for their crash pad, while teachers on the west side of the Cascade mountains paid $950/month for the same.

I made a prediction based on what I analyzed about the situation back in the mid-80s. Eventually, this statewide allocation model would revert back to the levy system. Sure enough, this is precisely where we've arrived at today. In doing so, the union has created its own financial problem.

Not too long ago a U.S. Supreme Court ruling went in favor of those who didn't want to be forced to pay union dues; the Janus decision. However, as a response to this ruling the unions are now getting laws in state legislatures to make it next to impossible to get out of unions, and have contributed to essentially erasing the gains made by the McClary decison in WA state Supreme Court only last year.

While teachers may have gained a massive percentage increase in their salaries, they may find themselves resenting getting it in the future.

Thursday, April 18, 2019

No Collusion Or Obstruction

That's right! Read it and weep, liberals. Despite your obsession with revisiting your mid-70s victory, you gambled and LOST! As Don Henley sang, "Get Over It!"

I'm not going to waste any time, after 2.5 years and 35 million of our taxpayer dollars wasted on what we knew then when it started and all through this ridiculous journey, going into any details on it. We're fed up to our eyeballs with it and on the stupid power play these jerks in Congress have claimed - Trump is a TRAITOR!!! - and most likely, as with most of what goes on there, will get away without any consequences for saying so. It's perfectly clear that Congress is not about looking out for the good of the country, but for their own good and enrichment!

The biggest missing item in Mueller's Report is all the evidence which is there for who's to blame for concocting this whole hoax; Hillary! With pending indictments and investigations going on about this side of all of this, there will be some fast and unbelievable news coming out. But, you'll only hear it on the conservative news outlets.

Done! Over! End of story! Good - bye!

Monday, April 15, 2019

Compelled Speech is Fascism


The left claims they are the tolerant ones. They assert that they are for freedom of speech, but ONLY if it agrees with their ideological expectations.

This current trend of political correctness by today's leftists belies these claims and assertions when they put people into jail for refusing to go comply. It's neither tolerant nor honoring individual opinion. For an example of what's going on with this, I recommend this video from PragerU. George Orwell was more a prophet than a fiction novelist.

The only reason such trends are occurring is because too few of us are paying attention to what our local school boards, city or county councils, or state legislatures are doing. What are they doing? They're changing policies or laws to transform society's norms progressively, and already some are discovering it too late.

Sunday, April 14, 2019

A.G. Barr Brings Accountability, By Kimberly Strassel

It appears some people are getting nervous in D.C.
= = = = = = = = =

Trump’s foes call it ‘stunning and scary.’ Here’s what they have to be scared about.

 
By 
Kimberley A. Strassel
April 11, 2019  
Attorney General William Barr says he believes that the Trump presidential campaign was spied on, and that he wants to make sure the subsequent investigation was "adequately predicated."
The most inadvertently honest reaction to Attorney General William Barr’s congressional testimony this week came from former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. Mr. Barr had bluntly called out the Federal Bureau of Investigation for “spying” on the Trump campaign in 2016. Mr. Clapper said that was both “stunning and scary.” Indeed.
No doubt a lot of former Obama administration and Hillary Clinton campaign officials, opposition guns for hire, and media members are stunned and scared that the Justice Department finally has a leader willing to address the FBI’s behavior in 2016 They worked very hard to make sure such an accounting never happened. Only in that context can we understand the frantic new Democratic-media campaign to tar the attorney general.

Bill Barr Digs Into 2016 Trump Campaign
Bill Barr digs into the 2016 spying on the Trump campaign, and Netanyahu wins again.
Mr. Barr told the Senate Wednesday that one question he wants answered is why nobody at the FBI briefed the Trump campaign about concerns that low-level aides might have had inappropriate contacts with Russians. That’s “normally” what happens, Mr. Barr said, and the Trump campaign had two obvious people to brief—Rudy Giuliani and Chris Christie, both former federal prosecutors.
It wasn’t only the Trump campaign that the FBI kept in the dark. The bureau routinely briefs Congress on sensitive counterintelligence operations. Yet former Director James Comey admits he deliberately hid his work from both the House and the Senate. And the FBI kept information from yet another overseer, the judicial branch, failing to tell the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that the Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee had paid for the dossier it presented as a basis for a surveillance warrant against Carter Page, a U.S. citizen.
Why the secrecy? Mr. Comey testified that the Trump probe was simply too sensitive for members of congressional intelligence committees to know about—an unbelievable statement given the heavy publicity he gave the investigation of Mrs. Clinton’s improper handling of classified information. Here’s a more plausible explanation: Mr. Comey and his crew have also testified that they were all convinced Mrs. Clinton would win the election. That would have meant that no politician other than the incoming Democratic president would have known the FBI had spied on the Trump team. Nor would the public. A Clinton presidency would have ensured no accountability.
Mr. Trump’s victory destroyed that scenario, and it became clear that the new Republican president would soon know that the former Democratic administration had surveilled his campaign on the basis of information from his rival, At that point two things happened. Neither was accidental, and both were aimed, again, at forestalling accountability.
First, Mr. Comey and other intelligence officials, including Mr. Clapper, engineered the public release of all the scandalous claims against Mr. Trump, to provide some cover. As liberal commentator Matt Taibbi notes in his new book, “Hate Inc.” Mr. Comey’s Jan. 6, 2017, briefing of the president-elect about the dossier was a classic Washington “trick.” It served as the “pretext” to get the details out, a “news hook” to allow the press to publish the dossier—with its salacious fictions about prostitutes and Moscow hotel rooms—and go wild.
Democrats used the furor in their successful push for a special counsel, which gave greater legitimacy to the FBI’s probe. The appointment of a special counsel also froze other oversight. Congress can’t have access to certain documents or ask witnesses certain questions, since that might interfere with the probe. The White House can’t demand answers, because that too would interfere. Mr. Trump’s adversaries got to hide behind Robert Mueller for nearly two years.
Second, Democrats mobilized against the other big threat, incoming Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who had the authority to conduct an internal review. Don’t forget, the dossier wasn’t delivered only to the FBI. Its ultimate owners were the Clinton campaign and the DNC. And one huge outstanding question is just how many Democrats pushing for Mr. Sessions’ recusal in early 2017 did so with full knowledge of the FBI-Clinton tie-up. Certainly no Republicans were aware, and thus they were clueless to the bigger consequences of the unnecessary Sessions recusal.
Namely, that no outsider would take a hard look at the FBI. The Russia question fell to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, an institutionalist who would go on to sign the final application for a surveillance warrant against Mr. Page. Again, no accountability. Meantime, wonder why Democrats tried so hard to mau-mau Mr. Barr into also recusing himself? The goal all along has been to deep-six any discovery until a Democrat returns to the White House
Mr. Barr didn’t merely refuse to recuse; he’s made clear he plans to plumb the FBI’s actions thoroughly. That makes him Threat No. 1 to everyone who participated in these abuses, and it’s why the liberal media establishment is now disparaging his integrity. They are stunned and scared—that accountability has returned to the Justice Department.

Saturday, April 13, 2019

Where's Congressman Gowdy When We Need Him?

Here we are, nearly a year and a half after one of the best legal minds on justice in Congress has left, to now learn that the Mueller investigation found no collusion with the Russians on the Trump Campaign's part to rig the election.

And why did he leave? To understand that, I suggest reading this article which provides the information from him, rather than through me.

But why do I say that he was the best legal mind when it comes to justice in Congress? Well, for that I suggest watching this fifteen minute video on the hearing of Gowdy's questions to the Inspector General Horowitz who's been tasked with digging into the details behind much of this, and comments about, the F.B.I. agents Stroke and Paige's involvement in the Russia Collusion Hoax, Clinton investigation for espionage, and Mueller's team for a brief time when it began, and you'll understand why.

I'm certain that it will help clarify things as to why the Liberals in Congress who are now "in charge" are scrambling to deliberately confuse the public - who most likely hasn't ever seen the video I've provided here - as to the definition of what the word "spy" means. But, If the level of "expertise" for the Democrat lead committees is indicated by Cong. Maxine Waters' knowledge about who is in charge of student loans, then I'm not too worried.

I won't be surprised to learn in future news releases - given Congressman Devin Nunes's recent announcement - that there will be some players in this hoax going to jail in the future. Just wait and we'll see.

Learning From History & Science

In our current culture of instant information and communi-cation it's become apparent to me that we, as a people, seem to be losing sight of the broader perspective of knowledge and truth.

More specifically, I'm referring to how the news is focused on how A.O.C. - Congresswoman from N.Y. - has captured our attention on the "threat of climate change" and how we must do something - like spending hundreds of trillions of dollars we don't have on top of what we already owe ourselves in our national debt to completely eliminate modern modes of transportation and at the same time eliminate a source of food - cows - because they produce too much methane; never mind what the rest of the world's countries are producing above what our nation does; like China, to name one.

We've all heard for years from Al Gore and company that the science is settled, or the consensus in Science leaves no doubt that if we don't eliminate "greenhouse gases" radically, and soon, then we'll see the oceans rise, and temperatures create unbearable increases. Of course, many times they've said, "In ten years we'll see Florida under water!" or, "The north pole ice cap is disappearing!" or, "We've got twelve years, at best, before our species is eliminated because of climate change!"

So, you're probably wondering as well what I'm referring to in the phrase, "...the broader perspective of knowledge and truth." in my opening sentence of this post. Well, I'll let a video which speaks to the issue A.O.C. believes justifies her demand that her "Green New Deal" become law to explain just what I mean by that phrase. If the viewer pays close attention to what is explained - I know, for some this five minute video may give too much information for one to focus on for that long, but if you try, you can do it - it will become clear. So, please, give it a try!