As most conservatives have been, or are currently, learning about Demorcats/Liberals/Socialists, it is that they are habitual lairs. Hillary was a great example, but now Sanders, Warren, Harris, et al, have made it pretty clear to us all.
They not only are lying about current issues in this presidential campaign, but they've been lying about the true origin of who has been responsible for Jim Crow laws in the south, the truth behind the K.K.K., and why they've made themselves out as the party looking out for minorities over the last several decades.
If you view the latest video from PragerU titled "Reconstruction: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly", you'll learn information about these things your high school teachers, or college professors, didn't accurately educate you about regarding this era of our nation's history. Instead, they fed you slanted and revised versions of what really happened.
Monday, September 9, 2019
Friday, September 6, 2019
Four Simple Questions...
Are there ANY logical answers?
You be the judge……
Here's what I would like to know. If the TRUTH ever comes out and it is decided that Obama was never eligible to be president, what happens to all the laws he signed into being and all the executive orders?
Very truly yours,
RICHARD R. SILVERLIEB
Attorney at Law
354 Eisenhower Parkway
Livingston, NJ 07039
( https://www.linkedin.com/in/ richard-silverlieb-3145502a )
You be the judge……
Here's what I would like to know. If the TRUTH ever comes out and it is decided that Obama was never eligible to be president, what happens to all the laws he signed into being and all the executive orders?
Should they all be null and void?
Here are 4 Simple questions from a reputable attorney..... This should really get your "gray matter" to churning, even if you are an Obama fan.
For all you "anti-Fox News" folks, none of this information came from Fox. All of it can be verified from legitimate sources (Wikipedia, the Kapiolani hospital website itself, and a good history book, as noted herein). It is very easy for someone to check out.
4 Simple Questions.......
1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes’. So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is "African-American" when the term wasn't even used at that time ?
2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961, and Lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, Right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in "Kenya, East Africa".
This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist?
Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate". (check it below)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Kenya_%28http:/en.wikipedia.. org/wiki/Kenya%29
3. On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital".
This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home," respectively.
The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?
(CHECK IT BELOW)
( http://www.kapiolani.org/ women-and-children/about-us/ default.aspx )
Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media?
Here are 4 Simple questions from a reputable attorney..... This should really get your "gray matter" to churning, even if you are an Obama fan.
For all you "anti-Fox News" folks, none of this information came from Fox. All of it can be verified from legitimate sources (Wikipedia, the Kapiolani hospital website itself, and a good history book, as noted herein). It is very easy for someone to check out.
4 Simple Questions.......
1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes’. So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is "African-American" when the term wasn't even used at that time ?
2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961, and Lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, Right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in "Kenya, East Africa".
This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist?
Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate". (check it below)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Kenya_%28http:/en.wikipedia.. org/wiki/Kenya%29
3. On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital".
This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home," respectively.
The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?
(CHECK IT BELOW)
( http://www.kapiolani.org/ women-and-children/about-us/ default.aspx )
Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media?
4.
Perhaps a clue comes from Obama's book on his father. He states how
proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. I'm not a math genius, so I
may need some help from you. Barack Obama's "birth certificate" says
his father was 25 years old in 1961 when Obama was born. That should
have put his father's date of birth approximately 1936 - if my math
holds (Honest! I did that without a calculator!) Now we need a
non-revised history book-one that hasn't been altered to satisfy the
author's goals-to verify that WW II was basically between 1939 and 1945.
Just how many 3 year olds fight in Wars? Even in the latest stages of
WW II his father wouldn't have been more than 9 years old.
Does that mean that Mr. Obama is a liar, or simply chooses to alter the facts to satisfy his imagination or political purposes ?
Very truly yours,
RICHARD R. SILVERLIEB
Attorney at Law
354 Eisenhower Parkway
Livingston, NJ 07039
( https://www.linkedin.com/in/ richard-silverlieb-3145502a )
Friday, August 23, 2019
Insanity Has Errupted On Campuses Across America
As a father of two daughters who were born in the decade of the '80s, I'm grateful that they didn't have to deal with the insanity which is now prevailing at colleges today.
It's gotten so bad today at colleges that students are being indoctrinated into becoming social justice warriors by the time they finish their degrees; unless, of course, they're going to Liberty, or Hillsdale which don't take a dime of federal funding. (However, I must point out that my older brother's daughter, who went off to a mid-west college prior to my daughters being old enough to go, came home totally indoctrinated from her college experience.)
Penny Nance has written an excellent article about her own child's orientation which just took place for this coming fall. You won't believe what the experience was like! If you think things have gotten crazy at colleges today, then you'll have that sentiment confirmed when reading this article.
It's gotten so bad today at colleges that students are being indoctrinated into becoming social justice warriors by the time they finish their degrees; unless, of course, they're going to Liberty, or Hillsdale which don't take a dime of federal funding. (However, I must point out that my older brother's daughter, who went off to a mid-west college prior to my daughters being old enough to go, came home totally indoctrinated from her college experience.)
Penny Nance has written an excellent article about her own child's orientation which just took place for this coming fall. You won't believe what the experience was like! If you think things have gotten crazy at colleges today, then you'll have that sentiment confirmed when reading this article.
Sunday, August 18, 2019
They're Coming To America
Neil Diamond's song of this post title rings true of those who, living in a country with different, but less fortunate circumstances, hear about the opportunity which awaits them if they go to the effort of getting here through the legal process.
When they finally arrive, often through great difficulty - leaving their loved ones behind due to the expense of such a trip - they discover that the stories about America are true and many times, even more amazing and wonderful. This was the case for Carla from a South American country. Having lived in America for several decades, she was motivated to become naturalized because of what Pres. Trump has done in his first term.
Sadly, as Rush Limbaugh pointed out recently in his radio show, the globalists who want to promote broderless countries are working at achieving the exact opposite. They - George Soros being one of the more prominent figures in the effort - finance organizations to recruit and encourage Hondurans, Guatemalans, or El Salvadorans to form massive "caravans" of people to simply march up through Mexico to the southern border and either sneak across the border, or take advantage of laws which eventually allow them to fade into the shadows of our various cities.
This process of applying the "Cloward & Piven" strategy of overwhelming a specific system, and thereby bring about a crisis that attempts to break the system established down, is the goal of such an activity by these globalists elitists; like George Soros and his Open Society.
So, I ask the question: Why is that Carla understands the importance of supporting the president, while many who've lived in America all their lives don't? Is it just that they have different political ideals, or is it out of ignorance, because they have never experienced anything other than what this great country has to offer, and thus take it for granted?
I've long believed that this nation's affluence has contributed to the latter mindset, where the concept of "fairness" and "privilege" have been perverted to work for those who want to promote socialism and not applying one's self to what it takes in order to accomplish those things which make for a better life within the social structure of law & order for all.
When they finally arrive, often through great difficulty - leaving their loved ones behind due to the expense of such a trip - they discover that the stories about America are true and many times, even more amazing and wonderful. This was the case for Carla from a South American country. Having lived in America for several decades, she was motivated to become naturalized because of what Pres. Trump has done in his first term.
Sadly, as Rush Limbaugh pointed out recently in his radio show, the globalists who want to promote broderless countries are working at achieving the exact opposite. They - George Soros being one of the more prominent figures in the effort - finance organizations to recruit and encourage Hondurans, Guatemalans, or El Salvadorans to form massive "caravans" of people to simply march up through Mexico to the southern border and either sneak across the border, or take advantage of laws which eventually allow them to fade into the shadows of our various cities.
This process of applying the "Cloward & Piven" strategy of overwhelming a specific system, and thereby bring about a crisis that attempts to break the system established down, is the goal of such an activity by these globalists elitists; like George Soros and his Open Society.
So, I ask the question: Why is that Carla understands the importance of supporting the president, while many who've lived in America all their lives don't? Is it just that they have different political ideals, or is it out of ignorance, because they have never experienced anything other than what this great country has to offer, and thus take it for granted?
I've long believed that this nation's affluence has contributed to the latter mindset, where the concept of "fairness" and "privilege" have been perverted to work for those who want to promote socialism and not applying one's self to what it takes in order to accomplish those things which make for a better life within the social structure of law & order for all.
Wednesday, August 14, 2019
Sunday, August 11, 2019
The Epstein Story Grows More Mysterious by the Minute!
It appears that the "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous" isn't exactly what Robin Leach of the television series of the '90s made them all out to be.
The following links I'm posting here are for those who "think" they know what has gone on in the Jeffrey Epstein news; mostly because the Media (D) is only feeding the public what they know will "sell" and what they don't want it to know about what was has really gone on in secret.
Thanks go to my friend, who keeps in close touch with what's really going on in the "swamp".
Speaking of the "swamp", you might want to watch this '87 interview on the Late Night with David Letterman Show of Donald Trump. The more interesting comments begin at about the 15 minute mark into the segment. And then, there's this pre-2000 interview with Jay Leno on the Tonight Show about him running for president then. Gee, do you think he was at least consistent with his policies? It's interesting to compare comments about Mayor Koch and Mayor Gulliani. Finally, there's this 2013 interview by David Letterman with Donald as a grandpa for the sixth time. After about the 8:00 mark, they discuss the political situation then.
The following links I'm posting here are for those who "think" they know what has gone on in the Jeffrey Epstein news; mostly because the Media (D) is only feeding the public what they know will "sell" and what they don't want it to know about what was has really gone on in secret.
Thanks go to my friend, who keeps in close touch with what's really going on in the "swamp".
Speaking of the "swamp", you might want to watch this '87 interview on the Late Night with David Letterman Show of Donald Trump. The more interesting comments begin at about the 15 minute mark into the segment. And then, there's this pre-2000 interview with Jay Leno on the Tonight Show about him running for president then. Gee, do you think he was at least consistent with his policies? It's interesting to compare comments about Mayor Koch and Mayor Gulliani. Finally, there's this 2013 interview by David Letterman with Donald as a grandpa for the sixth time. After about the 8:00 mark, they discuss the political situation then.
Wednesday, August 7, 2019
Why Are Liberals So Obsessed With Taxing Everyone?
As I was listening to Rush this morning I heard the following interview. Something this person said hit me with a thought that I'd NEVER considered before. I'd like my readers to go through this script from Rush's show and see if you can detect exactly what it was that this teacher in L.A. said that sparked this speculation. I will share that particular thought after the script.
= = = = = = = = = = =
RUSH: Hi. Welcome back. Rush Limbaugh, cutting edge of societal evolution. We go to Dallas to get started on the phones. I’m sorry, it’s Los Angeles, and Dallas is the guy’s name. Great to have you, Dallas. Welcome to the program.
CALLER: Thanks, Rush. It’s great to talk to you.
RUSH: Thank you, sir.
CALLER: I am a gay schoolteacher living in Los Angeles, California. I voted for Obama twice, and the left has gone so far they have pushed me out of the party and have me seething, So what in the hell are they doing to the industrial Midwest?
RUSH: You know, this is another good point. I’m glad that you mentioned this. You say you voted for Obama twice. How old are you? How long have you been voting?
CALLER: I’m 40.
RUSH: You’re 40. By the way, how do you survive in California as a teacher with the tax rate and all the taxes out there? I mean, that’s gotta be… (crosstalk) Do you have any disposable income left, Dallas?
CALLER: I got a little bit left over ’cause I don’t have kids. If I had a family, I could never do it. But, yeah. I get into some very interesting discussions all the time because I want to have open-minded discussions. Trump, to me, exposed both parties and what they’re about. It’s the “uni-party” versus the American people.
RUSH: That’s another great point. See, it dovetails with the belief that l I think there are Trump voters more than there are Republican voters. Even though he’s got 90% approval among Republican voters. But, look, this is something that we will never hear about. In fact, we’re hearing the opposite. But here’s Dallas. He’s a gay schoolteacher in Los Angeles. He has left the Democrat Party after he voted for Obama twice. They’re too nuts! They’ve gone too radical leftist even for him. Now he’s probably not shouting from the rooftops that he’s switching or not voting Democrat. But, still, he’s not.
Now, all the while this is going on, the media wants you to believe that Trump is losing suburban voters because he’s not agreeing to gun control. You want to talk about a political myth? “Yeah, Trump is losing suburban voters!” In other words, suburban voters want guns taken away and Trump won’t do it, and so Trump is losing suburban voters. It’s the exact opposite. The story here is what is happening to the Democrat Party that Joe Biden is the frontrunner in this party?
= = = = = = =
So, did you catch that remark about family and taxes from Dallas? I've always, as most do, known that liberals love to tax everyone to the point of making it difficult to get by, but this gay guy's statement about how he could never do it if he had a family caused a sudden realization that made a connection for me... liberals are using taxation on the citizens to make it all the more difficult to raise a family. Why is this significant?
Well, we also know that liberals, first of all, consider themselves to be so smart that they've got all the ideas that will solve all the world's problems, right? Okay, we also know that the vast majority of liberals have their shorts in a twist about climate change, and how it's going to kill the planet in about a decade... and, we also know that they've promoted the idea that the world's population needs to be reduced, right?
So, if we connect their pension for taxation which makes it more difficult for a couple to raise a family, with climate change and population, then... are you getting where I'm going with this? If the liberal's overarching agenda is to reduce the population of our country, while wanting to deal with climate change, then one way to tackle both issues simultaneously, is to tax them to death while filling their coffers for all their social programs to keep the masses dependent on them for their needs. Brilliant!
= = = = = = = = = = =
RUSH: Hi. Welcome back. Rush Limbaugh, cutting edge of societal evolution. We go to Dallas to get started on the phones. I’m sorry, it’s Los Angeles, and Dallas is the guy’s name. Great to have you, Dallas. Welcome to the program.
CALLER: Thanks, Rush. It’s great to talk to you.
RUSH: Thank you, sir.
CALLER: I am a gay schoolteacher living in Los Angeles, California. I voted for Obama twice, and the left has gone so far they have pushed me out of the party and have me seething, So what in the hell are they doing to the industrial Midwest?
RUSH: You know, this is another good point. I’m glad that you mentioned this. You say you voted for Obama twice. How old are you? How long have you been voting?
CALLER: I’m 40.
RUSH: You’re 40. By the way, how do you survive in California as a teacher with the tax rate and all the taxes out there? I mean, that’s gotta be… (crosstalk) Do you have any disposable income left, Dallas?
CALLER: I got a little bit left over ’cause I don’t have kids. If I had a family, I could never do it. But, yeah. I get into some very interesting discussions all the time because I want to have open-minded discussions. Trump, to me, exposed both parties and what they’re about. It’s the “uni-party” versus the American people.
RUSH: That’s another great point. See, it dovetails with the belief that l I think there are Trump voters more than there are Republican voters. Even though he’s got 90% approval among Republican voters. But, look, this is something that we will never hear about. In fact, we’re hearing the opposite. But here’s Dallas. He’s a gay schoolteacher in Los Angeles. He has left the Democrat Party after he voted for Obama twice. They’re too nuts! They’ve gone too radical leftist even for him. Now he’s probably not shouting from the rooftops that he’s switching or not voting Democrat. But, still, he’s not.
Now, all the while this is going on, the media wants you to believe that Trump is losing suburban voters because he’s not agreeing to gun control. You want to talk about a political myth? “Yeah, Trump is losing suburban voters!” In other words, suburban voters want guns taken away and Trump won’t do it, and so Trump is losing suburban voters. It’s the exact opposite. The story here is what is happening to the Democrat Party that Joe Biden is the frontrunner in this party?
= = = = = = =
So, did you catch that remark about family and taxes from Dallas? I've always, as most do, known that liberals love to tax everyone to the point of making it difficult to get by, but this gay guy's statement about how he could never do it if he had a family caused a sudden realization that made a connection for me... liberals are using taxation on the citizens to make it all the more difficult to raise a family. Why is this significant?
Well, we also know that liberals, first of all, consider themselves to be so smart that they've got all the ideas that will solve all the world's problems, right? Okay, we also know that the vast majority of liberals have their shorts in a twist about climate change, and how it's going to kill the planet in about a decade... and, we also know that they've promoted the idea that the world's population needs to be reduced, right?
So, if we connect their pension for taxation which makes it more difficult for a couple to raise a family, with climate change and population, then... are you getting where I'm going with this? If the liberal's overarching agenda is to reduce the population of our country, while wanting to deal with climate change, then one way to tackle both issues simultaneously, is to tax them to death while filling their coffers for all their social programs to keep the masses dependent on them for their needs. Brilliant!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)