Decades ago, when someone told me that some day we would see our government take more and more control over our lives, I scoffed at them. The dominant mind-set of citizens then was that we lived in the land of "the free and the home of the brave", right? After all, the parent in a family unit was seen as the ultimate authority of a child in our society back then, our government and its laws understood that premise, and we believed that this assumption would never be tampered with.
Well, here we are, decades later and one country's government is now entertaining the concept that if parents don't accept their child's "gender identity", and act according to government's expectations, then the government will take action to correct it.
Don't believe me? Here's an article which backs up this move. How long do you think it will be, if this actually passes into law in the country to our north, before we see such a bill being proposed by our own liberal/statists here in the U.S.? And who do we have to blame for such a thing even being considered?
I'll let you tell me. Leave a comment.
Wednesday, June 7, 2017
Ever Seen Murphy's Other Laws?
Here's Murphy's other 15 laws:
1. Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
2. A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well.
3. He who laughs last, thinks slowest.
4. A day without sunshine is like, well, night.
5. Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine.
6. Those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't.
7. Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.
8. The 50-50-90 rule: Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong.
9.
It is said that if you line up all the cars in the world end-to-end,
someone from California would be stupid enough to try to pass them.
10. If the shoe fits, get another one just like it.
11. The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first.
12. Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will sit in a boat all day drinking beer.
13. Flashlight: A case for holding dead batteries.
14 . God gave you toes as a device for finding furniture in the dark.
15.
When you go into court, you are putting yourself in the hands of twelve
people, who weren't smart enough to get out of jury duty.
Monday, June 5, 2017
Senator Murray's Reply - My Response - on Immigration
Below is a reply I received from one of my two liberal Senators on my communication regarding immigration. Interspersed among her points, I shall comment with my thoughts (italicized) about what she says: [Note: the pasting by me of her letter's formatting as I received it reveals that the office aide who composed this response used parts from differently formatted boiler-plate sources.]
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dear Mr.
Higley:
Thank
you
for
writing
to
me
in
regard
to
the
United
States
immigration
system.
It
is
good
to
hear
from
you
about
this
very
important
issue.
Well, at least she's trained her office aide to start out politely and try to soften me up with cordialitites for starters.
For
many
years,
Congress
and
the
American
people
have
engaged
in
spirited
debate
about
reforming
our
nation’s
immigration
laws.
It
is
clear
that
our
immigration
system
is
broken
and
that
fixing
this
system
is
critical
for
families,
communities,
and
businesses
in
Washington
state
and
across
the
nation.
No... really? And who has been responsible for breaking it? (Hint: Go look in the mirror, along with all the other elected representatives who've made Congress a career, in both parties! Remember 1986and the broken promises from that amnesty bill?) The second half of the second sentence in this paragraph is where she begins to show her true ideological colors regarding this issue. Critical for who, those you've allowed to enter our nation illegally, some who've murdered, raped, or gotten our men, women and children addicted to drugs, sold into the human trafficking industry, etc.?
President
Trump
issued
a
series
of
executive
orders
that
ban
travel
from
several
majority-Muslim
countries,
call
for
a
deportation
force,
and
attempt
to
cut
off
funding
to
so-called
sanctuary
cities
and
counties
that
prioritize
the
safety
of
their
citizens
over
local
immigration
enforcement.
Instead
of
working
to
bring
Americans
together
to
unite
behind
commonsense
reforms,
he
continues
to
create
chaos
and
confusion
for
immigrant
families
in
the
United
States,
refugees,
and
travelers.
I
am
deeply
disappointed,
but
not
surprised,
to
see
President
Trump
turn
his
divisive
campaign
rhetoric
into
actions.
To
undo
the
harm
President
Trump
has
caused,
I
have
cosponsored
legislation
to
rescind
these
executive
orders
and
I
have
called
on
President
Trump
to
abandon
this
misguided
approach.
Oh boy, here come the real "zingers" in this paragraph. The gloves are off now! Pres. Trump's the one who has created the chaos and confusion? Oh... those poor innocent illegals who have made our communities less safe. According to her it's Trump's fault that they're being threatened with the possibility of deportation. Has she even checked what Mexico's own immigration laws and enforcement are? Obviously not! But, she is the savior of the oppressed, the social justice warrior who will come to the defense of the oppressed that are facing harm from Trump!
In
order
to
fix
our
broken
immigration
system,
I
have
long
supported
comprehensive
immigration
reform
that
protects
families,
strengthens
our
economy,
enhances
our
security,
and
reflects
our
core
values
as
Americans.
As
a
United
States
Senator
I
have
supported
laws
to
protect
DREAMers
—undocumented
immigrants
who
were
brought
to
the
U.S.
as
children,
earned
a
diploma
or
served
in
our
military,
and
have
followed
the
law.
In
addition
I
have
worked
to
create
pathways
to
citizenship,
reduce
the
use
of
detention,
keep
families
together,
improve
the
visa
system,
and
eliminate
the
immigration
court’s
backlog.
Comprehensive
immigration
reform
is
good
for
our
businesses,
our
workers,
and
our
economy,
which
is
why
we
need
immigration
policies
that
both
protect
workers
and
provides
employers
certainty
in
a
system
that
has
often
left
them
without
answers.
Senator... I don't care how much you've worked as a Senator over your nearly 35 year career as a politician, they're STILL ILLEGAL!!! Let's just be honest about this. What you and your party are counting on is a voter base to replace those American citizen who are now leaving the Democrat Party in droves because the truth that everyone knows is that your party has moved from being against minorities having equal opportunities in the days of Jim Crow and the K.K.K. - what most youth today don't realize is the hidden truth of the past - to the party which has promoted welfare to the minorities in order to keep them on the "government plantation" and dependent and ignorant.
I
will
continue
to
call
for
comprehensive
immigration
reform
that
measures
up
to
our
long-held
American
values,
ensures
that
while
we
are
being
tough
on
those
who
are
a
threat
to
our
public
safety
or
national
security,
we
are
enforcing
our
immigration
laws
in
a
smart,
humane
way
for
millions
of
undocumented
immigrants.
I
will
fight
for
as
long
as
it
takes.
It
is
inspiring
to
know
that
so
many
people
in
Washington
state
and
across
the
country
refuse
to
remain
silent.
We
must
recommit
ourselves
to
working
as
hard
as
we
can
to
move
our
country
forward
and
continue
to
speak
up
when
our
values
are
threatened. I
will
continue
to
work
to
fix
our
broken
immigration
system.
Oh... now she's gettin' all patriotic and acting like she's
keeping her constituents safe from all those bad folk. If her definition of "enforcing our immigration laws in a smart, humane way for millions of undocumented [a.k.a. illegal] immigrants" is to ignore federal law by maintaining sanctuary cities - like Seattle - then, as far as I'm concerned, she's qualified for sittin' in prison for treason! And, just who's "values" is she talking about here? Not my values, that's for sure! She'll continue working to fix the broken immigration system until it achieves what her party's ultimate goal is... to infiltrate this nation to the point of taking it over so they have totalitarian control.
Again,
thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
share
your
thoughts
with
me,
please
know
that
I
will
keep
your
thoughts
in
mind.
If
you
would
like
to
know
more
about
my
work
in
the
Senate,
please
feel
free
to
sing
up
for
updates
at http://murray.senate.gov/updates.
United States Senator
Charles Krauthammer on Build the Wall
There's been a lot of debate on whether our nation should build a wall.
One side is against it. To some the idea is akin to the Berlin Wall in Germany, but is that a correct analogy? To others who believe we should be an open society - like those who support George Soros' movement - feel we should let everyone who wishes to come and take advantage of the opportunities our nation provides. But that obviously is ignoring the reality that there would eventually be a limit at which those opportunities would no longer exist because an overwhelming number would completely disolve, or overtake, the American culture which made it unique among the world.
The other side is for it. To some the idea preserves our nation's sovereignty and culture. This, in turn, prolongs the opportunities our form of representative democracy provides, like no other in the world. It is also a matter of maintaining law and order. As many who have lived during the past 60 or so years will attest, this issue has clearly been under attack and has accelerated exponentially over the past ten years with the recent administration's policies. With more and more unrest and chaos dividing the nation over this issue, a pall of madness seems to have gripped the nation; especially for those who are against keeping our nation's sovereignty and law and order.
In this video from Prager U, Krauthammer lays out what he believes is a viable solution. Again, there will be those who feel it is a sensible one. Yet others will feel that allowing those who've illegally entered the country should not be rewarded by allowing them to stay without some form of fine. Otherwise, they see it as making the concept of sovereignty and law and order a sham and a joke. This is the kind of no win situation our leaders over the past 50 years have given us.
And I've not even mentioned the proverbial "elephant in the room" issue of our nation's national debt and its unfunded liabilities which no one wants to even talk about.
Bishop Brown Responds to Trump's Decision on Paris Peace Accord
Informing Jurors of Their Rights is Now ILLEGAL in Michigan
- Is it illegal to stand on a sidewalk and hand out pamphlets to anyone going by?
- Is it illegal to educate people about your personal point of view on any issue or topic?
- Is it legal for a judge to have an individual arrested for doing the two things above without first asking the individual a few questions about his activity and intent?
What's even more alarming about this case when one learns of the details is that not only were the jurors for the case not allowed to hear key points about the case, but that the jurors, ignorant of these facts, found the man guilty.
I recently served on jury duty at my local courts. I know for a fact that, based on the process that goes on for selection, there's no legitimate concern by the judge that justifies this case.
Is this what our legal system is supposed to stand for; strong arming individuals who cause a judge to be concerned, and then rigging the case? More importantly, how much longer will it be before we hear of other states' judges pulling the same kind of power play against their citizens? Or, has it already happened, but we just aren't aware of it?
Saturday, June 3, 2017
Withdrawling From the Paris Peace Accords
Dear Reader,
Has paying attention to the left's claims about various social issues and global issues - like climate change - actually an exercise in mass psychological manipulation? I don't know about you, but I can't help but watch these news interviews at various events - this one being Earth Day - where participants are asked to share their thoughts on whatever the topic of concern is and every time we hear the same, consistent talking points which hold no logical, rational, reasoning to them; they're just talking points regurgitated! However, it's nevertheless confusing to me why they're concerned about the potential loss of life from these potentially devastating events, when most of them, I assume, are for abortion that's been killing the future population of our country for decades. (Oh, wait, it's the concern that the threat they're speaking about is going to kill them that causes them to be alarmed. I see.)
It's my speculation that the way this "peace accord" was crafted was deliberately done so that it would be so complex and confusing that the average Joe Sixpack or Jane Selfie would not be able to follow what it's really about, or what is really being done to impact them, so they would - as social conditioning has so effectively done over the years with mass media influence - follow along because they didn't want to appear stupid, confused, or opposing their peers mindless acceptance to what the left's leader were spouting. (You know the routine.)
For those who've made the mental effort to understand the ploy being foisted on citizens of the United States, the following piece from Tucker Carlson's Show on the announcement by Pres. Trump will more easily following the points he's making at the introduction to this topic recently. One of the very astute points Carlson makes is that that, despite the fact that liberals have been making these dire claims of impending doom for decades now, Pres. Obama in his first two years as "Golfer-in-Chief" had a Congress that could have easily passed this Paris Peace Accord had he focused on getting it to approve this treaty. But no, instead he chose to unconstitutionally skirt around Congress and play "emperor" with it by calling it something that it was not.
Tucker interviews the Mayor of Miami Beach after his introduction and, as is typical for all his guests he has on his show to ask them some key questions, the Mayor NEVER answers Tucker's key question about the unfairness of this accord. That, right there, should tell you something as an intelligent person regarding the left's awareness of this whole issue. They are attempting to "pull the wool" over the public's eyes about what they're REALLY up to with it. In other words, there's something they refuse to disclose that is part of their true agenda.
As Todd Herman of a local radio station is noted as saying, "Where there's a double standard, there's usually a hidden agenda."
And, just for the sake of another person's perspective, I urge my readers to view this video by Bill Whittle on this topic. He gets to the heart of what's really going on here; the weaponization of Science into politics!!! Watching this video and seeing the rest of the evidence he presents makes it rather obvious.
Has paying attention to the left's claims about various social issues and global issues - like climate change - actually an exercise in mass psychological manipulation? I don't know about you, but I can't help but watch these news interviews at various events - this one being Earth Day - where participants are asked to share their thoughts on whatever the topic of concern is and every time we hear the same, consistent talking points which hold no logical, rational, reasoning to them; they're just talking points regurgitated! However, it's nevertheless confusing to me why they're concerned about the potential loss of life from these potentially devastating events, when most of them, I assume, are for abortion that's been killing the future population of our country for decades. (Oh, wait, it's the concern that the threat they're speaking about is going to kill them that causes them to be alarmed. I see.)
It's my speculation that the way this "peace accord" was crafted was deliberately done so that it would be so complex and confusing that the average Joe Sixpack or Jane Selfie would not be able to follow what it's really about, or what is really being done to impact them, so they would - as social conditioning has so effectively done over the years with mass media influence - follow along because they didn't want to appear stupid, confused, or opposing their peers mindless acceptance to what the left's leader were spouting. (You know the routine.)
For those who've made the mental effort to understand the ploy being foisted on citizens of the United States, the following piece from Tucker Carlson's Show on the announcement by Pres. Trump will more easily following the points he's making at the introduction to this topic recently. One of the very astute points Carlson makes is that that, despite the fact that liberals have been making these dire claims of impending doom for decades now, Pres. Obama in his first two years as "Golfer-in-Chief" had a Congress that could have easily passed this Paris Peace Accord had he focused on getting it to approve this treaty. But no, instead he chose to unconstitutionally skirt around Congress and play "emperor" with it by calling it something that it was not.
Tucker interviews the Mayor of Miami Beach after his introduction and, as is typical for all his guests he has on his show to ask them some key questions, the Mayor NEVER answers Tucker's key question about the unfairness of this accord. That, right there, should tell you something as an intelligent person regarding the left's awareness of this whole issue. They are attempting to "pull the wool" over the public's eyes about what they're REALLY up to with it. In other words, there's something they refuse to disclose that is part of their true agenda.
As Todd Herman of a local radio station is noted as saying, "Where there's a double standard, there's usually a hidden agenda."
And, just for the sake of another person's perspective, I urge my readers to view this video by Bill Whittle on this topic. He gets to the heart of what's really going on here; the weaponization of Science into politics!!! Watching this video and seeing the rest of the evidence he presents makes it rather obvious.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)