The latest media outrage over a remark from the president and how they "couch" the remark's intent, or meaning, causes me to understand more clearly why most conservatives in our country have abandon, in droves, being subjected to the meme they are obviously pushing. To me, this kind of manipulation of events in their favor - to convince those who have little to no critical thinking skills, or interest in viewing an event objectively - is what our "new world order" is today; both across the U.S. and in many countries around the globe.
In two words; political correctness.
The left has, since the '90s and the Clinton administration, very carefully and in progressively incremental steps, ratcheted up their rhetoric while shifting from from being civil and accepting of commonly understood points, to not accepting facts for what they are regarding any issue or topic which does not align with their goal. They are very adeptly targeting the youth of our nation who have insufficient life experience and more easily accept without question concepts and ideology which build on that inexperience.
After all, hasn't it been obvious that respect for elders has diminished over the last several decades? I saw it coming while raising my daughters when the cartoon series with Bart Simpson became popular, along with other sitcoms that had teens in a family setting chastising their parents and talking to them as though they were more wise than their parents who just didn't understand. This modeling to the youth of our households promoted the kind of attitudes many millennials have at corporations like Google, Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, and other social medias where it's become common place for left minded youth to have no compunction to call those who disagree with them racists, bigots, xenophobes, sexist or misogynists. Rather than discuss issues in a civil manner, using reason, just label one's opponent with words which attack their personal worth as individuals.
As I've said in previous posts, socialist/communists have long been implementing a long-range plan to undermine - through use of our own judicial and constitutional rights - by using these tools against us in order to gradually shift our norms and reduce our resistance to them. Sadly, they've been pretty effective as witnessed with the gender, immigration, and welfare issues.
Now, I believe, we are about to go through a situation in national politics which will shake our country to the core and prove to be ten times more disconcerting than the Watergate hearings we went through in our younger years. In my view, a president having to resign over 18 minutes of missing tape recording in the Watergate scandal is on a Kindergarten level compared to a president and former secretary of state working together to use unverified information through the F.B.I. to get a FISA warrant to spy on a presidential candidate and president-elect campaign staff.
We're talking major felonious crimes and disregard for constitutional rights here! Forget the misdemeanors.
Friday, January 12, 2018
Thursday, January 11, 2018
Obama/Clinton Collude To Weaponize DOJ in 2016 Election
Investigations are now revealing evidence that Hillary Clinton and then Pres. Obama - as partners in crime - used a variety of sources and agencies within the D.O.J. respectively to attempt to both create the Trump Dossie and manipulate the general presidential election for Clinton during the campaign.
The following is a transcript from Sean Hannity's evening show on FOX News for today, January 11th, which I've recorded and transcribed myself. (As soon as I get the video of this portion of his openning monolog for this show, I will post it for those who would rather view it, than read it.)
But breaking right now, Sara Carter, investigative reporter, is now telling us that the top investigator, the guy we've been telling you about, Andrew Weissman, he met with journalist from the AP last April to discuss the news outlets' investigation into Paul Manifort. Now, the next day, the AP published a major expose' about Paul Manifort and alleged money laundering. And sources are telling Sarah Carter that the AP reporters in that meeting, they were actually promising to share documents and other information about Manifort with the Dept. of Justice. There's going to be a lot of news in the coming weeks about the media and all of the role they're playing in all of this. Now the AP tonight is denying this,saying it's categorically untrue.
Now, at the time of this conversation Weissman was the head of the department's fraud division and would, a short time later, would join Muller's team, the following month. And according to the report, Weissman notified his superiors about the sit-down with the AP reporters, and during that time he wasn't working for the Manifort case and he didn't have any documents related to it. This shows Weissman had prejudice going into the investigation against Paul Manifort.
Now, that's on top of his troubling history of Weissman, he led the controversial obstruction of justice case, remember, Arthur Anderson and the Enron scandal? Remember, he destroyed that company, tens of thousands of people lost their job, that verdict was later overturned in a Supreme Court unanimous nine/zero ruling. Weissman also put four Merril executives in jail for a year. Those convictions were also overturned in that case by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. This is why we have to question the decision of Robert Muller making these people like Weissman, and only Democratic donors, why given this history was he ever appointed? And why Muller filled that team with people who gave money to Hillary Clinton, the DNC, over $50,000 to candidates like this and Barrack Obama?
Also, a big follow up tonight on our exclusive reporting last night on the Clinton bought and paid for phony Russian propaganda dossier with all that salacious material that we have confirmed has been used, was used by the Obama administration to literally surveile members of the Trump campaign team and then, president-elect Donald Trump and members of his transition team.
Now, we've been all over this story from the beginning, but just to give you an idea of how serious this is, sources telling me, this is all going to be proven right. To quote him, "Hannity, you're way over the target at low altitude. And everyone on the 'destroy Trump' media will be proven so wrong on so many levels." He said, "You can't even imagine how bad this is gonna get."
Now, in addition to the phony dossier, being used to destroy members on the Trump campaign, Sarah Carter is reporting, and we have confirmed this, that information about this systemic FISA abuse will also be exposed soon; maybe as early as next week.
Now, surveiling the Trump campaign isn't the only incident, it goes way beyond that. This is the real, Russia Scandal, the media has never reported on. And it has nothing to do with what the "fake news" media has been spoon feeding the entire country for the past year on the Trump/Russia collusion, it doesn't exist! There's no evidence. Even top Democrats have been telling us, but nobody listens. And they still keep reporting it anyway. Unimaginable, take a look: [Video montage follows]
Now, instead, the real collusion involves Hillary Clinton and the DNC spending millions of dollars trying to influence an election by funding all of this salacious, Russian source dossie', that the Obama administration then used to spy on an opposition party in a presidential election year. President Trump himself reacting by tweeting;
Let's go back to October, 2015, the Washington Free Beacon, they paid FusionGPS to do standard, political, op research then candidate Donald Trump. It had nothing to do with Russian sources. Christopher Steele was not involved at all; the MI6 agent. Then in April of last year, when it was clear that Trump would be the Republican nominee, back in 2016, Hillary Clinton and the DNC, that Donna Brazile said Clinton controlled - especially the money - took over the funding of the project. All tolled, they would pay FusionGPS over $10 million through a law firm. By the way, the DNC, Hillary's campaign, they used the same law firm.
And the former British spy, Christopher Steele, then, at that point, when the Democrats were paying him, Hillary's paying him, he gets involved in June of that year. Now, keep in mind, according to Vanity Fair, Steele has paid Russian sources over the years as part of his "job". And during that summer, Steele, quickly goes to work, using current and former Russian government sources to produce what we now know is the phony, fake news dossier, that included the salacious and completely false information, including Donald Trump, in Russia at the Ritz-Carlton, Moscow, with hookers, urinating on beds. Wow!
Now, keep in mind, former F.B.I. Director, James Comey, he even testified under oath that the content of the dossier were unverified. Well, that apparently did not stop Steele from reportedly briefing news outlets, let's see, like the New York Times, the Washington Post, Yahoo News, the New Yorker, and fake news CNN, all about the dossier.
Now that may mean Steele was trying to influence the election with a dossier that Clinton paid for. Of course Clinton wanted this. Then fast forward, November 28th, according to reporter, David Kramer, an ally of Senator John McCain, he meets with Steele. Steele agrees to give him a copy of the dossier to give McCain, which Kramer does. Then, in early 2016, McCain then gives the dossie to the F.B.I. Director, James Comey. See how it all tying together?
And in January of last year, BuzzFeed, well they decided to publish this fake dossier that President Trump's personal attorney, Michael Cohen, just this week, is now suing over deffimation. Now here's where it gets shocking. According to reports, during the summer of 2016, former Trump campaign associate, remember Carter Paige, he's spied on. They used the FISA warrant. And we've found out from other reporting, that former Trump Campaign Chairman, Paul Manifort, he was surveilled before, and after the election. And now, thanks to Sara Carter and John Solomon and others, we have confirmed tonight, this new information, through three separate sources. We started it last night.
The Clinton funded dossier with all that salacious material, that was used as a justification to obtain FISA warrants to spy on member of the Trump campaign, and then the President-elect. And we're learning more about the dossier from the very guy who helped create it, because Senator Feinstein released his congressional testimony. Now Feinstein's excuse is pretty lame, and pretty lame, she told NBC News today that the reason she released the information and the exchange with Congress, because, well, she had a bad cold. And the dog ate my homework! And that slowed down her mental abilities. Wow, really? So, what Feinstein did was a major breach of trust with Senate investigators, but actually, it provided some very interesting information.
Let's give you some. Alright, Glenn Simpson, of FusionGPS, alright, during that testimony, that he said he never even bothered to verify. What? Not even bother to verify? What Steele brought him from his Russian sources. And that he was against Donald Trump during the election. Shocking!
And we also know that Simpson met, remember? He met with the Russian lawyer, both before and after the meeting at Trump Tower. Remember the one with Don Jr. and Manifort and Jared Kushner in June of 2016. Oh, we're really supposed to believe that Glenn Simpson, who hates Trump, who never verified the dossier, that it's a mere coincidence that he's meeting with this Russian; as he testified to? And Simpson also met with former top DOJ official, remember, Bruce Ohr. Now tying that together. And Ohr's wife, Nellie, actually worked for FusionGPS.
I know this is a lot of information! Let me explain exactly what this all means. Clinton bought and paid for this phony dossier. This lie, this propaganda. She was hoping the Russian propaganda and lies would influence the general election. The Obama administration then politicized, and as I've been warning about, weaponized these powerful tools that we give our intelligence community and they used them to go after an opposition party in a presidential election year. So, we have Clinton putting the fix in. Remember, Bernie Sanders? We learned, from Donna Brazile the fix was in in the primary. It was a done deal. Bernie had no shot. The fix was also in... think about this, wit the Clintons. With the exoneration, before the investigation, in her email scandal. Remember, it was Comey and Peter Stzok, they were writing a letter of exoneration that they didn't even investigate yet. And then, she, here, was trying to use the dossier to fix the general election.
So, what's being exposed are massive abuses of our constitutional and civil liberties. Our fourth amendment rights and protections against unreasonable search and seizure. And this is now, reaching a point that you can't even imagine. Top government officials, at the top of your government; they're all involved. They will be exposed!"
The show then goes on to discuss these facts with three guests; Sarah Carter, Peter Schwitzer, author of Clinton Cash, and FOX News legal analyst, Greg Jarrett.
The following is a transcript from Sean Hannity's evening show on FOX News for today, January 11th, which I've recorded and transcribed myself. (As soon as I get the video of this portion of his openning monolog for this show, I will post it for those who would rather view it, than read it.)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Alright, the evidence of corruption and bias inside Inspector Muller's team, it just keeps piling up. Now, it does get complicated, I promise we'll go step by step, we'll break it all down for you tonight. But breaking right now, Sara Carter, investigative reporter, is now telling us that the top investigator, the guy we've been telling you about, Andrew Weissman, he met with journalist from the AP last April to discuss the news outlets' investigation into Paul Manifort. Now, the next day, the AP published a major expose' about Paul Manifort and alleged money laundering. And sources are telling Sarah Carter that the AP reporters in that meeting, they were actually promising to share documents and other information about Manifort with the Dept. of Justice. There's going to be a lot of news in the coming weeks about the media and all of the role they're playing in all of this. Now the AP tonight is denying this,saying it's categorically untrue.
Now, at the time of this conversation Weissman was the head of the department's fraud division and would, a short time later, would join Muller's team, the following month. And according to the report, Weissman notified his superiors about the sit-down with the AP reporters, and during that time he wasn't working for the Manifort case and he didn't have any documents related to it. This shows Weissman had prejudice going into the investigation against Paul Manifort.
Now, that's on top of his troubling history of Weissman, he led the controversial obstruction of justice case, remember, Arthur Anderson and the Enron scandal? Remember, he destroyed that company, tens of thousands of people lost their job, that verdict was later overturned in a Supreme Court unanimous nine/zero ruling. Weissman also put four Merril executives in jail for a year. Those convictions were also overturned in that case by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. This is why we have to question the decision of Robert Muller making these people like Weissman, and only Democratic donors, why given this history was he ever appointed? And why Muller filled that team with people who gave money to Hillary Clinton, the DNC, over $50,000 to candidates like this and Barrack Obama?
Also, a big follow up tonight on our exclusive reporting last night on the Clinton bought and paid for phony Russian propaganda dossier with all that salacious material that we have confirmed has been used, was used by the Obama administration to literally surveile members of the Trump campaign team and then, president-elect Donald Trump and members of his transition team.
Now, we've been all over this story from the beginning, but just to give you an idea of how serious this is, sources telling me, this is all going to be proven right. To quote him, "Hannity, you're way over the target at low altitude. And everyone on the 'destroy Trump' media will be proven so wrong on so many levels." He said, "You can't even imagine how bad this is gonna get."
Now, in addition to the phony dossier, being used to destroy members on the Trump campaign, Sarah Carter is reporting, and we have confirmed this, that information about this systemic FISA abuse will also be exposed soon; maybe as early as next week.
Now, surveiling the Trump campaign isn't the only incident, it goes way beyond that. This is the real, Russia Scandal, the media has never reported on. And it has nothing to do with what the "fake news" media has been spoon feeding the entire country for the past year on the Trump/Russia collusion, it doesn't exist! There's no evidence. Even top Democrats have been telling us, but nobody listens. And they still keep reporting it anyway. Unimaginable, take a look: [Video montage follows]
"Well, you know, the allegation, of course, is that the Russians, and the hacking and dumping of documents in the election, um, had essentially relationships with Trump campaign people. But, I'm not prepared to say that there's proof you could take to a jury." [Rep. Adam Schiff on MSNBC] June 18, 2017
"Do you agree with this conclusion that was reached, that there was no evidence of collusion?" [Stephonnopolis on ABC]
"You know, we don't have any seen of that, George. And we've been looking through everything they possibly have. Uh, that has not led to that." [Unidentified Congressman in repsonse] June 11, 2017
"The last time I spoke to you, Senator, I asked if you had actually seen evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians, and you said to me - I'm quoting you now you said, 'No, not at this time.' Has anything changed since we spoke last?" [Blitzer on CNN]
"Well, not... not ye..., no it hasn't." [Feinstein in response] June 18, 2017
"Just to be clear, there'sevidence, there's not been any actual evidence, yet." [Unidentified reporter on MSNBC]
"No, it has not, yet!" [Rep. Maxine Waters in response] May 18, 2017Nooo, not yet.
Now, instead, the real collusion involves Hillary Clinton and the DNC spending millions of dollars trying to influence an election by funding all of this salacious, Russian source dossie', that the Obama administration then used to spy on an opposition party in a presidential election year. President Trump himself reacting by tweeting;
"Disproven, and paid for by Democrats. Dossie used to spy on Trump campaign. Did F.B.I. use intel tool to influence the election? @foxandfriends Did Dems or Clinton also pay Russians? Where are hidden and smashed servers? [He's asking questions.] Where are crooked Hillary's emails? What a mess!"By the way, it's only getting bigger. Now the President raises some very Constitutional questions here. There's so much about this dossier that we still don't know about. But here's what we do know. And we're going to break this down and dissect this entire scandal, so that everybody understands it; even fake news - CNN - they may understand how serious this really is.
Let's go back to October, 2015, the Washington Free Beacon, they paid FusionGPS to do standard, political, op research then candidate Donald Trump. It had nothing to do with Russian sources. Christopher Steele was not involved at all; the MI6 agent. Then in April of last year, when it was clear that Trump would be the Republican nominee, back in 2016, Hillary Clinton and the DNC, that Donna Brazile said Clinton controlled - especially the money - took over the funding of the project. All tolled, they would pay FusionGPS over $10 million through a law firm. By the way, the DNC, Hillary's campaign, they used the same law firm.
And the former British spy, Christopher Steele, then, at that point, when the Democrats were paying him, Hillary's paying him, he gets involved in June of that year. Now, keep in mind, according to Vanity Fair, Steele has paid Russian sources over the years as part of his "job". And during that summer, Steele, quickly goes to work, using current and former Russian government sources to produce what we now know is the phony, fake news dossier, that included the salacious and completely false information, including Donald Trump, in Russia at the Ritz-Carlton, Moscow, with hookers, urinating on beds. Wow!
Now, keep in mind, former F.B.I. Director, James Comey, he even testified under oath that the content of the dossier were unverified. Well, that apparently did not stop Steele from reportedly briefing news outlets, let's see, like the New York Times, the Washington Post, Yahoo News, the New Yorker, and fake news CNN, all about the dossier.
Now that may mean Steele was trying to influence the election with a dossier that Clinton paid for. Of course Clinton wanted this. Then fast forward, November 28th, according to reporter, David Kramer, an ally of Senator John McCain, he meets with Steele. Steele agrees to give him a copy of the dossier to give McCain, which Kramer does. Then, in early 2016, McCain then gives the dossie to the F.B.I. Director, James Comey. See how it all tying together?
And in January of last year, BuzzFeed, well they decided to publish this fake dossier that President Trump's personal attorney, Michael Cohen, just this week, is now suing over deffimation. Now here's where it gets shocking. According to reports, during the summer of 2016, former Trump campaign associate, remember Carter Paige, he's spied on. They used the FISA warrant. And we've found out from other reporting, that former Trump Campaign Chairman, Paul Manifort, he was surveilled before, and after the election. And now, thanks to Sara Carter and John Solomon and others, we have confirmed tonight, this new information, through three separate sources. We started it last night.
The Clinton funded dossier with all that salacious material, that was used as a justification to obtain FISA warrants to spy on member of the Trump campaign, and then the President-elect. And we're learning more about the dossier from the very guy who helped create it, because Senator Feinstein released his congressional testimony. Now Feinstein's excuse is pretty lame, and pretty lame, she told NBC News today that the reason she released the information and the exchange with Congress, because, well, she had a bad cold. And the dog ate my homework! And that slowed down her mental abilities. Wow, really? So, what Feinstein did was a major breach of trust with Senate investigators, but actually, it provided some very interesting information.
Let's give you some. Alright, Glenn Simpson, of FusionGPS, alright, during that testimony, that he said he never even bothered to verify. What? Not even bother to verify? What Steele brought him from his Russian sources. And that he was against Donald Trump during the election. Shocking!
And we also know that Simpson met, remember? He met with the Russian lawyer, both before and after the meeting at Trump Tower. Remember the one with Don Jr. and Manifort and Jared Kushner in June of 2016. Oh, we're really supposed to believe that Glenn Simpson, who hates Trump, who never verified the dossier, that it's a mere coincidence that he's meeting with this Russian; as he testified to? And Simpson also met with former top DOJ official, remember, Bruce Ohr. Now tying that together. And Ohr's wife, Nellie, actually worked for FusionGPS.
I know this is a lot of information! Let me explain exactly what this all means. Clinton bought and paid for this phony dossier. This lie, this propaganda. She was hoping the Russian propaganda and lies would influence the general election. The Obama administration then politicized, and as I've been warning about, weaponized these powerful tools that we give our intelligence community and they used them to go after an opposition party in a presidential election year. So, we have Clinton putting the fix in. Remember, Bernie Sanders? We learned, from Donna Brazile the fix was in in the primary. It was a done deal. Bernie had no shot. The fix was also in... think about this, wit the Clintons. With the exoneration, before the investigation, in her email scandal. Remember, it was Comey and Peter Stzok, they were writing a letter of exoneration that they didn't even investigate yet. And then, she, here, was trying to use the dossier to fix the general election.
So, what's being exposed are massive abuses of our constitutional and civil liberties. Our fourth amendment rights and protections against unreasonable search and seizure. And this is now, reaching a point that you can't even imagine. Top government officials, at the top of your government; they're all involved. They will be exposed!"
The show then goes on to discuss these facts with three guests; Sarah Carter, Peter Schwitzer, author of Clinton Cash, and FOX News legal analyst, Greg Jarrett.
Wednesday, January 10, 2018
Liberals No Longer Care About Facts
Have you noticed, as I have, how the liberals have over the past decade abandon interest in law and order, national unity under the concept of patriotism, or a public education system that is focused on facts and indisputable truths? Is it a coincidence that this was the same period in which we had what I believe was the most divisive and polarizing president in our nation's history? I thank God Trump's work over his first year in office has negated a lot of what Obama enacted!
Has it occurred to you from what you've witnessed regarding various national policies, such as immigration, police, and free speech, that liberals have engaged in a psychological gamesmanship where if an issue is debated, say on a show like Tucker Carlson's, their standard response to a pointed question is either to deny any validity to it, or just plain ignore the question and drone on about the talking points they want to get on the air? How pathetic!
Let's get specific. Voter fraud is one instance in which they're winning the battle in the media and with Pres. Trump attempting to look into it's potential impact on our democratic process. It's as though they're taking the concept of power residing in the people to an extreme. In other words, damn the possibility that there may be illegals who are managing to vote when they shouldn't be, they have rights too! Yet, under our laws, they're not suppose to be able to vote.
Whenever the issue of immigration is spoken of by most liberals today, they speak in terms of "human rights" as though that somehow has a transferring power to constitutional rights automatically. That was never the intent or meaning behind the laws which have been in place since the founding of this country.
Here... watch this video by Dick Morris to understand better what I'm getting at when it comes to voter fraud. While I hope Dick is wrong regarding Trump giving up on this issue by handing it over to Homeland Security, I am concerned that he appears to be getting a bit worn down by the persistent resistance current the liberals in the media and the swamp are putting in him.
Has it occurred to you from what you've witnessed regarding various national policies, such as immigration, police, and free speech, that liberals have engaged in a psychological gamesmanship where if an issue is debated, say on a show like Tucker Carlson's, their standard response to a pointed question is either to deny any validity to it, or just plain ignore the question and drone on about the talking points they want to get on the air? How pathetic!
Let's get specific. Voter fraud is one instance in which they're winning the battle in the media and with Pres. Trump attempting to look into it's potential impact on our democratic process. It's as though they're taking the concept of power residing in the people to an extreme. In other words, damn the possibility that there may be illegals who are managing to vote when they shouldn't be, they have rights too! Yet, under our laws, they're not suppose to be able to vote.
Whenever the issue of immigration is spoken of by most liberals today, they speak in terms of "human rights" as though that somehow has a transferring power to constitutional rights automatically. That was never the intent or meaning behind the laws which have been in place since the founding of this country.
Here... watch this video by Dick Morris to understand better what I'm getting at when it comes to voter fraud. While I hope Dick is wrong regarding Trump giving up on this issue by handing it over to Homeland Security, I am concerned that he appears to be getting a bit worn down by the persistent resistance current the liberals in the media and the swamp are putting in him.
Your Truth?
Last Sunday night during the Golden Globes Awards Oprah Winfrey was given the Cecil B. DeMill Award. Her speech contained a phrase - see this posts' title - which fits perfectly with the Hollywood philosophy of relativism; that it's only truth if it's convenient for you.
Brittany Hughes of MRCTV puts it best here in a brief video clip.
Ben Shapiro also had a few choice points to make in reaction to her remarks (At the 8:00 mark). BTW, if you watched it, did you catch the Tweet comment from NBC about the idea of her running? "Nothing but respect for OUR future president." Sound familiar?
I'm noticing something that, to me, is quite fascinating... how the media's instant reaction to some event is often incorrect. And why? Think about it for a moment. They operate in the effort to maintain ratings. How do they get high ratings? Be the first to break the news about something they think the public wants to know about. So, today we are watching reports which aren't accurate for the sake of beating the other channels announcing it.
Yet, the problem is, especially in this instance, that within 24 hours of others Tweeting out remarks about Oprah running for the Presidency, she herself made a statement countering this notion and completely negating any interest in doing so. This, to me, is a perfect example of how and why "fake news" today thrives and this, I believe is precisely why Pres. Trump calls the media on this fact. They're always using their medium to persuade people to the "pop-culture" notion that if it's on TV, then it must be true.
NOT!!! We're entering a new era, of a very weird and bizarre culture because of it. Especially when the reality of celebrities is discussed between McCallum and Shapiro.
Brittany Hughes of MRCTV puts it best here in a brief video clip.
Ben Shapiro also had a few choice points to make in reaction to her remarks (At the 8:00 mark). BTW, if you watched it, did you catch the Tweet comment from NBC about the idea of her running? "Nothing but respect for OUR future president." Sound familiar?
I'm noticing something that, to me, is quite fascinating... how the media's instant reaction to some event is often incorrect. And why? Think about it for a moment. They operate in the effort to maintain ratings. How do they get high ratings? Be the first to break the news about something they think the public wants to know about. So, today we are watching reports which aren't accurate for the sake of beating the other channels announcing it.
Yet, the problem is, especially in this instance, that within 24 hours of others Tweeting out remarks about Oprah running for the Presidency, she herself made a statement countering this notion and completely negating any interest in doing so. This, to me, is a perfect example of how and why "fake news" today thrives and this, I believe is precisely why Pres. Trump calls the media on this fact. They're always using their medium to persuade people to the "pop-culture" notion that if it's on TV, then it must be true.
NOT!!! We're entering a new era, of a very weird and bizarre culture because of it. Especially when the reality of celebrities is discussed between McCallum and Shapiro.
Tuesday, January 9, 2018
It's Psychological Warfare Folks!
I've long been firmly convinced from the various experiences I've encountered over my life, that a very sinister, corrupt, and evil campaign is being waged by elements of the leftist ideology to brainwash future generations in the United States in order to try and destroy its Christian foundation totally.''
Allow me to explain...
As long ago as when I was in my late teens I had visited the city of San Francisco several times, from the mid-sixties to the mid-seventies. While in high school, I went there to visit a girlfriend several times, and later to run the Bay-to-Breakers road race. I watched the city go through the changes of not only the Haight-Ashbury district with its hippies and drugs, but also the Tenderloin District as it morphed from the seedy section where a hooker could be found on any street corner to the hub of the homosexual community. There was one particular event - the killing of Harvey Milk - which, to me, was a watershed event for this community. In the aftermath of that event, the gay community solidified its political organization and we are now witnessing the fruits of their efforts. They've learned to effectively and persistently utilize the judicial system to implement their long term plan of foisting their agenda on everyone; whether they want it, or not, as we've recently witnessed in the "Bake me a cake!" cases by gay couples.
Case in point currently... below is a message I received today from Public Advocate, a Christian based anti-homosexual organization, which has been working diligently to fight the LGBT community's effort to complete that long term plan. I ask that you read it and consider what the future may hold should we sit on our hands and not stand up against this insidious psychological warfare this community is engaging in. For some, this information may be so disturbing our initial reaction is to just turn away because it seems to extreme. It's NOT going to go away!
Jon,
“President James Buchanan was most likely a homosexual.”
How would you feel if your child had to memorize this "fact" to pass their history test?
Would your child be able to ace the pop-quiz on "transgender persecution in George Washington's Army"?
This is now the required standard for public education in California.
The State of California will no longer allow any textbook for their young elementary classes that fails to wildly speculate about which historical figures “might” have been sexually perverse.
In other incidents, publishers were ordered to jump right past speculation and simply declare important figures to be homosexual.
Every single new textbook approved by the California Board of Education contains this filthy fiction.
Companies that refused to corrupt their academic materials are being discriminated against and banned from California schools.
This is in addition to the older mandates that every topic -- even mathematics -- must include lessons to push the Homosexual Agenda.
What’s more important than Ben Franklin’s work as an inventor and statesman?
Well for California 5th graders, it’s his “sexual orientation.”
Yes, now students will be memorizing details about presidents’ and founding fathers’ real and imagined “sexual orientations.”
This is identity politics at its worst.
History is the study of what actually happened -- not what the Left and the Homosexual Lobby prefer happened.
It won't be long before these schools are teaching that the First Amendment was actually adopted to limit Christian Liberty in America.
Our history is all we have to show our country wasn't always as perverse as it is now.
So the Homosexual Lobby is determined to rewrite real history in their own image.
They are blatantly teaching radical homosexual dogma to these young, impressionable children in order to brainwash them in the Homosexual Agenda.
Not only is it a violation of the First Amendment rights of Christian Californians, it's abusive to these young children.
And these new policies are so far outside the accepted standard of academics that no one could reasonably argue that this merely constitutes a “different approach to education.”
This is not education, it’s pure political propaganda.
And it’s being paid for with your tax dollars -- and mine.
Federal funds -- under the auspices of President Trump and his Department of Education -- are being misappropriated for the purpose of indoctrinating young children.
California is using our hard-earned tax dollars to fund lessons that are clearly not educational.
President Trump has the authority to take action on this.
I have prepared a petition to our president asking him to take immediate action to defund California’s public schools and open an investigation into possible criminal charges.
I know over the past year, California has outraged the rest of the country as they have thumbed their nose at President Trump -- and national security -- time and again.
Their misuse of public funds and abuse of school children is one issue that you and I can take action on right now to hold them to account.
Even more important is stopping this insidious corruption of education and history before the Homosexual Lobby spreads it to other states.
Mark my words, they have this planned for the whole country.
And if we can’t stop in California, we will be fighting it in our own communities.
So please, sign Public Advocate’s Call for Presidential Action right now.
Just click here.
And after you sign, please consider making a generous donation to fund Public Advocate's fight against the Homosexual Lobby.
For the Family,
HON. EUGENE DELGAUDIO
President, Public Advocate of the U.S.
P.S. California is now requiring elementary school children memorize the "sexual orientation" of historic figures -- or at least the "orientations" the Homosexual Lobby is making up.
By doing so with federal education dollars, they are committing a crime.
Which is why Public Advocate is calling on President Trump to immediately defund their schools and launch an official investigation.
So click here to sign your petition calling on the President to take action right now!
And after you sign, please chip in a quick donation to help fund our efforts.
*** Public Advocate is a
non-profit 501(c)(4) that fights for the Family. As such, we do not endorse or oppose any candidate for office.
Contributions or gifts to Public Advocate of the U.S. are not tax-deductible. Public Advocate is a non-profit organization that fights the radical agenda of the Homosexual Lobby. Public Advocate receives no government funds. You may reach us at: Public Advocate, P.O. Box 1360, Merrifield, VA 22116; phone (703) 845-1808; http://publicadvocateusa.org.
Allow me to explain...
As long ago as when I was in my late teens I had visited the city of San Francisco several times, from the mid-sixties to the mid-seventies. While in high school, I went there to visit a girlfriend several times, and later to run the Bay-to-Breakers road race. I watched the city go through the changes of not only the Haight-Ashbury district with its hippies and drugs, but also the Tenderloin District as it morphed from the seedy section where a hooker could be found on any street corner to the hub of the homosexual community. There was one particular event - the killing of Harvey Milk - which, to me, was a watershed event for this community. In the aftermath of that event, the gay community solidified its political organization and we are now witnessing the fruits of their efforts. They've learned to effectively and persistently utilize the judicial system to implement their long term plan of foisting their agenda on everyone; whether they want it, or not, as we've recently witnessed in the "Bake me a cake!" cases by gay couples.
Case in point currently... below is a message I received today from Public Advocate, a Christian based anti-homosexual organization, which has been working diligently to fight the LGBT community's effort to complete that long term plan. I ask that you read it and consider what the future may hold should we sit on our hands and not stand up against this insidious psychological warfare this community is engaging in. For some, this information may be so disturbing our initial reaction is to just turn away because it seems to extreme. It's NOT going to go away!
Jon,
“President James Buchanan was most likely a homosexual.”
How would you feel if your child had to memorize this "fact" to pass their history test?
Would your child be able to ace the pop-quiz on "transgender persecution in George Washington's Army"?
This is now the required standard for public education in California.
The State of California will no longer allow any textbook for their young elementary classes that fails to wildly speculate about which historical figures “might” have been sexually perverse.
In other incidents, publishers were ordered to jump right past speculation and simply declare important figures to be homosexual.
Every single new textbook approved by the California Board of Education contains this filthy fiction.
Companies that refused to corrupt their academic materials are being discriminated against and banned from California schools.
This is in addition to the older mandates that every topic -- even mathematics -- must include lessons to push the Homosexual Agenda.
What’s more important than Ben Franklin’s work as an inventor and statesman?
Well for California 5th graders, it’s his “sexual orientation.”
Yes, now students will be memorizing details about presidents’ and founding fathers’ real and imagined “sexual orientations.”
This is identity politics at its worst.
History is the study of what actually happened -- not what the Left and the Homosexual Lobby prefer happened.
It won't be long before these schools are teaching that the First Amendment was actually adopted to limit Christian Liberty in America.
Our history is all we have to show our country wasn't always as perverse as it is now.
So the Homosexual Lobby is determined to rewrite real history in their own image.
They are blatantly teaching radical homosexual dogma to these young, impressionable children in order to brainwash them in the Homosexual Agenda.
Not only is it a violation of the First Amendment rights of Christian Californians, it's abusive to these young children.
And these new policies are so far outside the accepted standard of academics that no one could reasonably argue that this merely constitutes a “different approach to education.”
This is not education, it’s pure political propaganda.
And it’s being paid for with your tax dollars -- and mine.
Federal funds -- under the auspices of President Trump and his Department of Education -- are being misappropriated for the purpose of indoctrinating young children.
California is using our hard-earned tax dollars to fund lessons that are clearly not educational.
President Trump has the authority to take action on this.
I have prepared a petition to our president asking him to take immediate action to defund California’s public schools and open an investigation into possible criminal charges.
I know over the past year, California has outraged the rest of the country as they have thumbed their nose at President Trump -- and national security -- time and again.
Their misuse of public funds and abuse of school children is one issue that you and I can take action on right now to hold them to account.
Even more important is stopping this insidious corruption of education and history before the Homosexual Lobby spreads it to other states.
Mark my words, they have this planned for the whole country.
And if we can’t stop in California, we will be fighting it in our own communities.
So please, sign Public Advocate’s Call for Presidential Action right now.
Just click here.
And after you sign, please consider making a generous donation to fund Public Advocate's fight against the Homosexual Lobby.
For the Family,
HON. EUGENE DELGAUDIO
President, Public Advocate of the U.S.
P.S. California is now requiring elementary school children memorize the "sexual orientation" of historic figures -- or at least the "orientations" the Homosexual Lobby is making up.
By doing so with federal education dollars, they are committing a crime.
Which is why Public Advocate is calling on President Trump to immediately defund their schools and launch an official investigation.
So click here to sign your petition calling on the President to take action right now!
And after you sign, please chip in a quick donation to help fund our efforts.
Contributions or gifts to Public Advocate of the U.S. are not tax-deductible. Public Advocate is a non-profit organization that fights the radical agenda of the Homosexual Lobby. Public Advocate receives no government funds. You may reach us at: Public Advocate, P.O. Box 1360, Merrifield, VA 22116; phone (703) 845-1808; http://publicadvocateusa.org.
Monday, January 8, 2018
My 2017 Annual Mortimer Snerd Award Goes to...
Mariana Flores of University of California San Diego.
What she apparently doesn't realize, or care to understand, is that if you don't participate with your fellow travelers in a march against Trump, then you won't risk getting hit by car while walking on the I-5 freeway!
Yet, she's filed a lawsuit against UCSD stating that the university failed to stop the protest march in order to protect her!
As Forest Gump is quoted as saying... "Stupid is, as stupid does."
What she apparently doesn't realize, or care to understand, is that if you don't participate with your fellow travelers in a march against Trump, then you won't risk getting hit by car while walking on the I-5 freeway!
Yet, she's filed a lawsuit against UCSD stating that the university failed to stop the protest march in order to protect her!
As Forest Gump is quoted as saying... "Stupid is, as stupid does."
Answering the Question - Is There An Afterlife?
There are three general groups of people; Christians who believe there's an afterlife, Atheists who believe there is no afterlife, and those who don't know, or either aren't curious or don't care about it.
Those who don't know, aren't curious or don't care, tend to discount the possibility of an afterlife for several and varying reasons. They have no physical evidence that there is because our physical experience isn't capable of detecting it; although there are those who may have encountered a spiritual form such as a ghost or apparition. The pleasures of our physical existence give them enough reason to discount any possibility that an afterlife exists, so it's understandable to take the easy conclusion that our physical existence is all there is.
Those who believe there is no afterlife, such as atheists, believe so because they are certain - for various personal reasons - that there is no God and that we are merely the most sentient form of animal on this planet due to evolutionary progress over epochs. Until we experience, or encounter, other sentient beings from other planets from other distant solar systems, then the fact that the planet we're on happens to be the only one in the entire universe makes it that much more difficult to discount God's unique creation. Have you noticed the rise in claims that we've been visited by aliens? And I don't mean from just over the southern border, either.
Christians, who believe there is an afterlife because they believe there is an omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent God understand the reasons behind why it is a reality as Dennis Prager, in his latest video, explains. I urge you to watch and review to consider the points made in it. Then, if it makes sense to you, I hope you accept Jesus Christ - His only son who sacrificed himself for our redemption - into your heart, confess your sins, and share the video link with others, and begin, or resume, reading the Bible.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)