Reality Check
By George Friedman
How North Korea Views the Situation on the Peninsula
Pyongyang has been pursuing a consistent strategy for decades.
Conducting
foreign policy or preparing for war requires the ability to put
yourself in your adversary’s position. Unless you understand what he
sees and how he thinks, his actions will make no sense to you. This will
cause you to miscalculate because you will confuse a lack of
understanding on your part with insanity or stupidity on your
adversary’s part. If you dismiss your enemy as a clown or lunatic – when
in reality he knows what he is doing and he understands what you are
doing – his chances of succeeding soar, while your chances plummet. This
is an important lesson to apply to the current situation on the Korean Peninsula.
The
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea was founded as a communist state
and a client of the Soviet Union. The Soviets encouraged North Korea to
invade South Korea to control the entire peninsula. North Korea’s
founder, Kim Il Sung, saw his regime nearly destroyed when the United
States, contrary to Soviet expectations or North Korean calculations,
intervened and decimated the North Korean army. North Korea exists today
only because the Chinese intervened as the Americans approached the Yalu River, which forms the border with China. The Chinese were not concerned about North Korea. They were concerned about their own national security.
Korean
People’s Army tanks are displayed during a military parade marking the
105th anniversary of the birth of late North Korean leader Kim Il Sung
in Pyongyang on April 15, 2017. ED JONES/AFP/Getty Images
China’s
intervention led to a stalemate on the peninsula roughly where the
current lines stand, which is not far from the original boundary between
the North and the South. In other words, the North Koreans gained
nothing from the war, and in surviving, they were dominated by the
Chinese. Whatever economy North Korea had was shattered, and the regime
was nearly destroyed.
The
North Koreans drew some important conclusions from the war. First,
communist ideology had little to do with their communist allies’
actions. The Soviets saw an opportunity to test the United States at
little cost or risk to themselves. If North Korea had taken the
peninsula, the Soviet position in the waters off the Asian mainland
would have been strengthened. But if North Korea had been occupied, the
Soviets would not have been worse off than they were. The Chinese were
willing to supply troops only until they themselves were at risk and
were also prepared to see North Korea destroyed or truncated.
International socialist solidarity was secondary to national interests.
North
Korea also learned that the United States was utterly unpredictable and
dangerous. Although the U.S. indicated that the Korean Peninsula was
not a central part of its policy in Asia, the U.S. entered the war,
fighting capably and at times brilliantly, as with the landing at
Inchon. While the U.S. remembers the fighting with the Chinese from the
standpoint of the retreat at Chosin Reservoir, the U.S. killed around
180,000 Chinese troops. The U.S. stood its ground and gave better than
it got.
The
North Koreans learned that what the Americans said had little to do
with what they did, and that the Americans, if they chose, could bring
enormous forces to bear. North Korea also realized that the Soviets
regarded North Korean interests as subsidiary to even secondary Soviet
interests. As for the Chinese, they had a capable force but one that
would be deployed only when Chinese interests were at stake.
Therefore,
the North Koreans believed their position was strategically impossible.
They faced three major powers, any one of which could annihilate North
Korea. Their strategy was to avoid annihilation by proving it would not
be worth anyone’s trouble. This did not mean being meek by any stretch.
It required convincing other powers that they would incur a huge cost by
absorbing or defeating North Korea. The country’s greatest strength was
its relative unimportance. If it could also increase the dangers
involved in being subdued, it could survive.
To
do this, the North Koreans would have to build a military machine
capable of deterrence. A country as poor as North Korea had to
militarize the entire society. It had to produce the wherewithal to
survive and field a military force capable of keeping all others at bay.
North Korea is still poor, but despite that poverty it is too dangerous
to deal with. Modern North Korea is a rational adjustment to its
perceived reality. It might follow that the populace would be restive.
But whether through intimidation or contentment, little evidence exists
that they are. So the North Korean government operates from a stable
platform.
The
Sino-Soviet split of the 1960s brought about another dimension. North
Korea learned to manipulate these countries and used their distrust of
each other to extract support by shifting its weight from side to side.
The North Koreans used the tensions on their border to increase their
value to each country at different times and, therefore, to control
their relationships. After 1991, this became even harder and in some
ways more profitable as the residual ideological ties dropped away and
all sides could pursue their national interests. But the fall of the
Soviet Union and the emergence of China brought their own perils. China
became the overwhelming force, and one that was difficult to manipulate.
Therefore, North Korea’s core strategy had to be updated, and this
involved a nuclear program with serious intentions.
North
Korea sees itself as alone and isolated. Its history shows that
attempting to cooperate with its neighbors can lead to catastrophe. It
also believes that it can predict and control American behavior, but
this could also end in catastrophe. It has survived since the Korean War
by not being a significant strategic prize and by possessing a force
that deters intervention. North Korea’s world consists of China, Russia
and the United States. South Korea and Japan are not going to take any
steps without the United States. Therefore, the U.S. is the permanent
threat, while Russia and China (particularly China) are both dangers and
possible allies depending on circumstances. North Korea must be helpful
to China but never again become a pawn or a battlefield.
In a deterrence strategy, the method must always match the fear of the enemy. The United States fears terrorism and nuclear weapons.
North Korea is unable to strike the U.S., so it is a secondary threat.
But it believes that acquiring nuclear capability against the United
States would protect it from American unpredictability.
However
– and paradoxically – creating the deterrent leads to U.S.
unpredictability temporarily surging. Between the time that it
demonstrates the ability to create a nuclear deterrent and the time it
achieves it, the United States becomes extremely dangerous. Therefore,
to mitigate if not remove the danger – or at least to buy time – North
Korea must use China and Russia as a counter. They may not want North
Korea to have nuclear capability, but they have other issues with the
United States, and they might see an advantage in the U.S. focusing on a
minor country.
A
safer course might be to abandon the nuclear program, but the North
Koreans calculate that if they were to do this, they would be putting
off the inevitable. Their deterrent power would decline, and their
dependence on China and Russia would increase. That did not work well in
the past. Therefore, the only prudent course is to hope that short-term
considerations will force the Chinese and Russians to help them buy
time to complete their nuclear deterrent.
It
is an enormously risky path for the North Koreans, but ever since the
Soviet Union collapsed and the Chinese focused on Walmart, they have
been on a precipice. They have survived by cunning, bluffing
and the indifference of others. That is hope, not a strategy. Their
strategy is to become too dangerous to attack. The U.S. is
unpredictable, but one thing is certain: It will not engage a nuclear
state that can strike back. The North Koreans have drawn China into the
game, buying them more time. It is the witching hour for them, but they
expected this and will play it out.
The
North Korean government does not consist of one man. It has been
pursuing a consistent policy for over half a century. It is now in the
end game, and we do not know the answer to the most important question: Have the North Koreans already built a nuclear weapon,
and if not, how much time do they need? We also do not know if China
wants North Korea to be a nuclear power to absorb U.S. attention, or if
it would be afraid of a nuclear North Korea. The U.S. and North Korea
likely don’t know the answer, and perhaps the Chinese haven’t yet
decided. But the point here is that North Korea is not stupid nor crazy. Such powers do not create conundrums vastly beyond their apparent resources.
=============
Footnote: Here's Dick Morris's history review about who are to blame for why North Korea now has nuclear weapons capability. Watch this video clip about it here. He'd know, he was both Clinton's personal political advisor during the two term presidency.
=============
Footnote: Here's Dick Morris's history review about who are to blame for why North Korea now has nuclear weapons capability. Watch this video clip about it here. He'd know, he was both Clinton's personal political advisor during the two term presidency.
No comments:
Post a Comment